Looking back at the 2016 draft day trades

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,232
Name
Burger man
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/l...-carson-wentz-trades-ahead-of-2017-nfl-draft/

It's April 18, 2017, which means your taxes are due (no, wait, don't stop reading, they'll do themselves, I promise). It also means a year ago, the Eagles and Browns consummated the second of what would be two top-five draft trades for quarterbacks. The Rams and Eagles wouldn't say it at the time , but everyone knew who they were taking in the 2016 NFL Draft.

This is a good reminder that all the draft-day intrigue has yet to fully realize itself (the draft was 10 days away when those trades happened, and the 2017 NFL Draft is just over a week away) and that it's always smart to periodically check back in and see how the teams involved in these blockbuster trades ended up doing.

We knew the compensation involved when the deals occurred, and we had a good idea about how the compensation played out during last year's draft, but heading into this year's draft it's worth another look.

Let's see how the four teams involved fared almost exactly a year later, taking into account the players they drafted last year and the production those players gave them (we'll use Approximate Value, Pro-Football-Reference's catch-all statistic to measure the value of individual players) as well as looking at any future picks.

LAR.png
Los Angeles Rams

The price to move up to No. 1 overall last year was not cheap . With the Rams moving to Los Angeles, general manager Les Snead and then-coach Jeff Fisher decided to make a bold play up the board and get a franchise quarterback in California native Jared Goff. They ignored the very history they wrote in doing so , but if you want a quarterback and don't have the top pick, you have to pay a steep price.

At the time, the Rams lost when it came to any trade value chart you looked at -- Tennessee just held them hostage.

We'll get to the selections the Titans received soon, but the Rams got No. 1 overall, No. 113 and No. 177. They would eventually spin the 113th pick into the 117th and 206th overall picks.

We're giving them credit for utilizing that fourth-round pick to nab an extra player, but if you want to limit it to three that's fine too.

Players they got:

Player

Position

Round

Overall Pick

Approx. Value

Jared Goff

QB

1

1st

-2

Pharoah Cooper WR 4 117th 1
Temarrick Hemingway

TE

4

177th

0

Mike Thomas

WR

7

206th

0

Not great, Bob. It's not entirely fair to judge the Rams' draft yet, though, because we need to see how Goff looks when he's given some protection (the Rams did a good job in bringing in Andrew Whitworth this offseason), some weapons (they added Robert Woods to Tavon Austin so that's something?) and a full season of snaps in new head coach Sean McVay's offense. Firing Fisher was a good move long term to help out Goff's development. The Rams didn't even use him for the first half of last season.

The haul looks bad now but if Goff becomes a franchise quarterback then the Rams made a smart decision. Snead is still very much willing to defend the trade . It's too early to tell. There will be plenty of scrutiny on the Rams this season however.

Everyone eventually lost in the RG3 trade . Hopefully that won't be the case here.

TEN.png
Tennessee Titans

It's hard to imagine the Titans losing in the deal, too. Again, if Goff is a franchise quarterback, it's a good move for the Rams, but the Titans absolutely fleeced them in terms of the picks exchanged.

Tennessee got No. 15, No. 43, No. 45 and No. 76 overall as well as the Rams' first pick in 2017, which ended up being No. 5 overall. They gave up last year's No. 1 overall for three top-50 picks/four top-100 picks. Heck of a job by Jon Robinson -- if he hits on the pick (and his other first-round pick in this draft) the Titans could be morphing into a contender in front of our eyes.

Player

Position

Round

Overall

Approx. Value

Jack Conklin

OL

1st

6th

15

Austin Johnson

DT

2nd

43rd

1

Derrick Henry RB 2nd 45th 4
TBD (2017)

TBD

1st

5th

N/A

The Titans actually traded in reverse, utilizing No. 76 overall (which they received from the Rams), coupled with No. 15 overall (from the Rams) to move up to No. 6 overall, where they drafted Jack Conklin, who turned out to be a jackpot as a top-10 pick.

Conklin was part of a dominant, quickly rebuilt offensive line that set the stage for Mike Mularkey's "exotic smashmouth" offense, which at times also featured second-round pick Derrick Henry, who is the heir apparent to DeMarco Murray and some very nice insurance should something happen to Murray. At times last season Henry looked like he might already be the better running back.

Tennessee can either grab a stud offensive play-maker (O.J. Howard?) at No. 5 this year or go defense early and look to grab a wide receiver (Mike Williams or John Ross) with their second first-round pick. They are in fantastic position and absolutely made the right call in doing this deal with the Rams and in utilizing their resources to acquire talent.

PHI.png
Philadelphia Eagles

The Eagles are a perfect reminder that it's almost always too early to judge a trade -- the Eagles looked to be in a weird spot when they were facing a draft in Philadelphia without a first-round pick while holding onto a bunch of quarterbacks. Then Teddy Bridgewater went down and the Vikings sent a first-round pick to the Eagles for Sam Bradford. Throw in Carson Wentzclearly looking like a future franchise quarterback during his rookie season and this trade looks like a winner for the Eagles, even though they gave up a lot of picks to receive the No. 2 overall pick and a 2017 fourth-round pick.

Let's see who they got.

Player

Position

Round

Overall

Approx. Value

Carson Wentz

QB

1

2nd

10

TBD (2017)

TBD

4

139th

N/A

Again, Wentz was surprisingly good despite being thrown into action when most expected him to be redshirted in 2016. Regardless of what it cost Philadelphia, the Eagles appear to have acquired a franchise quarterback. That is almost priceless in today's NFL. That Howie Roseman netted this year's 14th overall pick from Minnesota for Bradford while giving up the 12th overall pick in the Wentz trade adds a little gravy to the situation.

Wentz does have to become a franchise quarterback -- and plenty of guys have gone on to fail after good starts to their career -- for this to look like a good deal, but right now the Eagles have to feel good about how they handled the situation.

CLE.png
Cleveland Browns

The Browns also got a good deal in this trade, because of the picks they acquired. But at some point, the fans will require a quarterback, and seeing Wentz succeed (especially in a season-opening victory over the Browns in Week 1 of 2016) when he was sitting there will be tough to stomach. But they netted some great value in the deal , although not quite the haul that the Titans got from Los Angeles.

The Browns got the No. 8 pick (dealt later to the Titans), the No. 77 pick (which they traded), the No. 100 pick (which they also traded), a 2017 first-round pick and a 2018 second-round pick. It's a minor miracle they haven't dealt the last two already. They almost certainly will.

Player

Position

Round

Overall

Approx. Value

Corey Coleman

WR

1

15th

3

Shon Coleman OT 3 76th 0
Cody Kessler

QB

3

93rd

3

Derrick Kindred

S

4

129th

2

Ricardo Louis

WR

4

114th

1

Jordan Payton

WR

5

154th

0

Spencer Drango

OL

5

168th

4

TBD (2017) TBD 1 12th N/A
TBD (2018) TBD 2 TBD N/A
Bear in mind that when we look at these picks, it's not always an even trade. They also gave the 141st pick to Carolina in order to move up, but that was the only other pick Cleveland sacrificed in these deals. Otherwise the Browns were just trading down, which has been the m.o. of this particular front office.

And let's not sugarcoat this for Cleveland: It doesn't look great right now. The Browns might have done the smart thing by trading down to acquire more picks. But all the picks in the world are meaningless if the evaluation isn't accurate.

That's not to say these players won't or can't be good. Corey Coleman flashed a lot. Can Drango play right tackle? That's the last piece of the puzzle for a potentially dominant offensive line. Expecting the first-year development of these guys to tell us everything about them is a mistake.

But Cleveland has been desperate for a quarterback for a long time and might have passed on a guy in Wentz that could be a franchise quarterback in order to add some nice complementary pieces.

The value of this deal could very well end up swinging on what Cleveland can accomplish with the No. 12 overall pick in this year's draft. No pressure.
 

RamsFlash80

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jan 15, 2016
Messages
1,403
I don't agree with this^^ Statement! Over a couple of years the Rams turned a really Bad Team into a respectable one! .. For a while!! JMHO!

Yeah that was a dumb statement from that article. Rams clearly won that trade. We ended up with Brockers, Ogletree, and Jenkins (even though hes gone was still a good player) while RG3 has flamed out of the league almost.
 

tempests

Hall of Fame
Joined
May 25, 2013
Messages
2,900
To come out of the RG3 trade without ever having produced a winning season doesn't feel like a win to me. We got more than Washington out of it but they've been to the playoffs multiple times regardless. Yes, we got two or three above average starters but we were shooting higher, much higher. Les Snead wrote "Build to dominate with R-Skin picks!" on the whiteboard in his office. Basically, our whole draft strategy for years revolved around that trade. It was supposed to reverse our franchise fortunes. "This is your Herschel Walker trade" said Jerry Jones to Les Snead when it happened.

Five years later they're still short on playmakers and depth and desperate enough for a QB that they made the biggest leap to no 1 in draft history.
 

Florida_Ram

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 18, 2016
Messages
2,622
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/l...-carson-wentz-trades-ahead-of-2017-nfl-draft/

It's April 18, 2017, which means your taxes are due (no, wait, don't stop reading, they'll do themselves, I promise). It also means a year ago, the Eagles and Browns consummated the second of what would be two top-five draft trades for quarterbacks. The Rams and Eagles wouldn't say it at the time , but everyone knew who they were taking in the 2016 NFL Draft.

This is a good reminder that all the draft-day intrigue has yet to fully realize itself (the draft was 10 days away when those trades happened, and the 2017 NFL Draft is just over a week away) and that it's always smart to periodically check back in and see how the teams involved in these blockbuster trades ended up doing.

We knew the compensation involved when the deals occurred, and we had a good idea about how the compensation played out during last year's draft, but heading into this year's draft it's worth another look.

Let's see how the four teams involved fared almost exactly a year later, taking into account the players they drafted last year and the production those players gave them (we'll use Approximate Value, Pro-Football-Reference's catch-all statistic to measure the value of individual players) as well as looking at any future picks.

LAR.png
Los Angeles Rams

The price to move up to No. 1 overall last year was not cheap . With the Rams moving to Los Angeles, general manager Les Snead and then-coach Jeff Fisher decided to make a bold play up the board and get a franchise quarterback in California native Jared Goff. They ignored the very history they wrote in doing so , but if you want a quarterback and don't have the top pick, you have to pay a steep price.

At the time, the Rams lost when it came to any trade value chart you looked at -- Tennessee just held them hostage.

We'll get to the selections the Titans received soon, but the Rams got No. 1 overall, No. 113 and No. 177. They would eventually spin the 113th pick into the 117th and 206th overall picks.

CAN WE KEEP THE DRAFT THREADS ON THE FRONT PAGE NOW WITHOUT MOVING THEM TO THE
NFL DRAFT / COLLEGE FOOTBALL forum section?

The recent articles/subjects being posted outside of the draft have little luster the closer the draft gets @SierraRam