Kneejerk Central: Draft Grades

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
42,370
Ok armchair warriors, I know you're chompin' at the bit to lay down some grades let's hear it!

For myself I am quite happy with this draft. Getting a solid collection of roles we required, plus a first round pick next year... Hard to give anything other than an A. So that's my grade, even though we look like we couldn't cover @Loyal in a pickup game with rushers counting five mississippi.
 

Ramhusker

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
15,340
Name
Bo Bowen
I'm going B+ because I didn't get my way most of the draft. Trading worked out pretty well though. Kinda miffed at no OT or CB taken in this draft. They know better than me so...
 

Gandalf

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
2,154
I like this draft, but it's too early to grade. That 1st next year can be worth as much as our whole draft.
 

Memento

Your (Somewhat) Friendly Neighborhood Authoress.
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
19,407
Name
Jemma
Terrance Ferguson - A.

(I would’ve preferred Fannin…but I absolutely cannot complain about getting a potentially-high 2026 first round pick in the process. And Ferguson has exemplary athletic traits. Easy A.)

Josaiah Stewart - A+.

(Stewart could and should have gone much higher. He’s not big or lengthy, but he’s an outstanding athlete with the ability to bend around the edge, an explosive first step, and one of the most sophisticated rushing plans in this class. An outstanding pick and an easy A+.)

Jarquez Hunter - A-.

(Maybe not the running back I expected, but I’m still pleasantly surprised. Fast, surprising ability to break tackles and pound the rock between the tackles, underrated receiver. I think he could be what we expected Tre Mason would be after 2014; that’s who he reminds me of in size and ability. Easy A-.)

Ty Hamilton - A.

(Trade up is the only reason I don’t have the grade higher. Outstanding and versatile tackle who can play 1 and 3 tech, great run stuffer, still has pass-rushing potential. Should’ve been a fourth round pick at least. Easy A.)

Chris Paul Jr. - A+.

(Absolute. Fucking. Steal. We don’t need Nick Bolton; we have our own. Violent tackler, steady run defender, has good instincts in the passing game. Playmaker. I don’t even care that we traded up. We would’ve never gotten him in the sixth. Easiest A+ in this draft considering need and talent.)

Konata Mumpfield - C-.

(I’m not warming up to Mumpfield, mind you. He has had a lot of bobbled passes at Pitt that will be drops at the next level, he’s slow (4.6) for his size (5’11”, 186 lbs.), and his production is very lacking, unlike others in his situation like Restrepo or Nash. But he’s a great route runner with decent quickness. I don’t think he makes this team, but for a seventh round pick, it could be worse: we could’ve drafted Shilo Sanders. C-.)

Draft overall grade: A.

In conclusion, it was a draft for quality instead of quantity and a stronger class next year. CPJ and Ferguson will be playing significant snaps, if not starting outright. Hamilton, Stewart, and Hunter will see significant snaps, and in the case of the latter two, I believe they could eventually start. I don’t think Mumpfield makes the team, but we’ll see with him as well - and I’ve been wrong many times before. Add in very intriguing undrafted free agents, per usual, and this could be a third masterclass by McSnead in a row.
 

Cjcinec

Rookie
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Messages
433
Name
Chris C.
I think it’s a B-. Like the 2026 number 1 and Ferguson in the 2nd round. Curious how the smaller but productive edge fits into the scheme. The Ohio State DL and the Auburn RB were depth pieces as it seems like the Rams like to draft DT and RB in every draft and let the incumbent play out their contracts at those positions. Liked the LB Chris Paul pick . The grade could improve depending on the way they are able to utilize the 2026 draft pick they got from the falcons. Wish they could have gotten a decent OT prospect along with some youth at CB and WR. Just seemed to be a weak overall draft class at those positions. Got some work to do with UDFA signings and the second phase of Free Agency. Need a swing tackle, veteran corner and another WR. The other NFC West teams all had productive drafts. Seahawks and Niners both needed OT help and while the Seahawks got a decent OL prospect in the first round they didn’t address OL again until the last round. Niners loaded up on defense but didn’t draft OL till 7th round. Cardinals loaded up on defense with 6 of their 7 picks.
 

Gandalf

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
2,154
Unless we make some trades, next year's draft should be a whole lotta fun. If it was somewhere other than Pittsburg, it would make a very fun vacation.
 

PARAM

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
4,563
Straight A's like every year before week 1. Seriously, like Merlin said, getting depth at the positions we needed depth (besides CB and OL) AND a first round pick for next year is a win. On that CB/OL, they are obviously happier than fans with those groups.
 

methomas50

Starter
Joined
Jan 18, 2024
Messages
657
Right now I am feeling in the B range. Feel good about Ferguson and Stewart and expect they contribute immediately. I don't have a problem with the Hunter pick but wonder what it means for the other two RBs that should be a head of him. I will never complain about adding to the trenches so I am good with Hamilton adding size to the middle of the D line. Chris Paul should contribute a lot as well, as LB was in need of a talent infusion. Intrigued by Willie Lampkin as UDFA, small but mighty O Lineman. "A" if the Atlanta pick next year turns into the next franchise QB.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
42,370
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #10
I like this draft, but it's too early to grade. That 1st next year can be worth as much as our whole draft.
This is a kneejerk thread. Meaning you are expected to grab your fuckin pitchfork and light some shit on fire.
 

sloramfan

Starter
Joined
Feb 24, 2013
Messages
863
hours after the draft, it's always an A+ for me...

my rose colored glasses come off during the camp and preseason period...

for now, im just happy we have some substance...

go rams

slo


cant wait to watch all the tear filled phone calls...

i have to admit, i've gotten a little dust in my eyes on a few of them ( sniffle) :)
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
42,370
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #12
Also the Shitters get an F- for taking Nick Martin.
 

Gandalf

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
2,154
This is a kneejerk thread. Meaning you are expected to grab your fuckin pitchfork and light some shit on fire.
My knee jerk reaction would be an easy A or A+. That #1 next year could really set us up for a top QB or a lot of talent elsewhere. Plus, the picks this year were very good. I like the way they played the board.
 

Memphis Ram

Legend
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
8,778
Not in to giving grades this early, but for a kneejerk reaction, I cannot help but to give them an A. But this grade includes the UDFA signings of Shaun Dolac and Willie Lampkin and the team picking up an extra 2026 1st round selection.
 

Neil039

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 3, 2020
Messages
4,513
Not as hyped on this draft as last years. IMO it's a C+. As of right now none of the position groups are vastly better than last year.

The First Rounder Next Year is a huge plus, that will factor into the 2026 draft.

I hope those that graded this an "A" are right, I can handle being wrong when it's means the Rams are better.
 

Psycho_X

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
12,718
I would go A-. I like all of the picks for the most part. The players all seem like fits for our systems. But no OT and CB scares me. We have literally no one who can play LT other than Alaric. Our season depends on Alaric staying healthy right now and that's scary.
 

CanadaRam

No guts, No glory.
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
579
Name
Andrew
Getting a #1 next year and plyers that could make a difference.
That's a fantastic draft.

Good to have a roster with no holes in it.