- Joined
- Jun 20, 2014
- Messages
- 4,184
Isn't that a number derived from the sum of the ages of the 53 divided by 53?
Wouldn't the average age of the STARTERS be more meaningful for comparison purposes?
I think so.
I'm far too lazy to do the research, but it wouldn't surprise me at all if that "starter average" might be significantly higher.
The OL age was reduced by new starters Hav, JB, and Barnes. But all others are a year older.
And on D, other than Akeem being slightly younger than Dunbar, everyone is a year older.
What do y'all think?
Wouldn't the average age of the STARTERS be more meaningful for comparison purposes?
I think so.
I'm far too lazy to do the research, but it wouldn't surprise me at all if that "starter average" might be significantly higher.
The OL age was reduced by new starters Hav, JB, and Barnes. But all others are a year older.
And on D, other than Akeem being slightly younger than Dunbar, everyone is a year older.
What do y'all think?