Janoris Jenkins or Patrick Peterson

[Dxmissile]

Who would you rather have?

 

[Dieter the Brock]

Janoris

 

[tempests]

Peterson, even after the lousy season he had.

I'm thinking he bounces back.

 

[badnews]

Jenkins could be better.
Peterson is more consistent... but he also gets more hype.

 

[CGI_Ram]

Peterson and it's not even close.

Multiple pro bowls.

Punt return ability.

Better all around player.

 

[Angry Ram]

Either. Both are equally good, production wise.

They just have different play styles.

 

[LesBaker]

Peterson is far and away the more skilled player.

 

[Legatron4]

Peterson and Jenkins both cover the #1 receiver. It's a close call. But at the end of the day I would take Peterson. Taller, faster and can return punts.

 

[Mister Sin]

I can't even imagine this being close. It's Peterson all day for me. I don't even know that Jenkins for sure starts for us next season. Gaines has a spot locked and the other will be a battle between Tru and Jenkins IMO.

 

[snackdaddy]

Al things being equal I'd take Peterson. But it would cost a lot more for him too. So maybe Janoris is the better option based on the cost.

 

[BonifayRam]

Patrick Peterson is slated to make a little under 15 million this upcoming season. Peterson's dead money is close to 24 million.

Janoris Jenkins is slated to make $1.59 million about 13 1/2 million less.

I like good value players & in this element Janoris is a real good value over Peterson.

 

[RAGRam]

Peterson, 11 times out of every 10, if Jenkins stops getting beat for 80 yard TDs 5 or 6 times every season then I'll give the question a bit more consideration.

 

[hotanez]

I can't even imagine this being close. It's Peterson all day for me. I don't even know that Jenkins for sure starts for us next season. Gaines has a spot locked and the other will be a battle between Tru and Jenkins IMO.

I agree with you Peterson all day but your wrong about Jenkins. Fisher already said that Tru and Gaines are competing against each other to see who starts opposite Jenkins. Jenkins is our #1 corner.

 

[Mister Sin]

Dude, it's June. What Fisher says is irrelevant. He also said Bradford was our QB. Gaines is EASILY the best CB on this team. Jenkins is solid but makes to many selfish bonehead plays. The

 

[Dodgersrf]

No knock on JJ.
Peterson is just better.

 

[HometownBoy]

Like others have said, no knock on JJ but Peterson just blows him out of the water.

Jenkins is good but Peterson is just a better athlete. He's multifaceted, not only is he a good DB, he can be a WR and return punts and kicks. Again, no knock on jenks, if I had my way they'd both be on my team. Just Peterson would be 1 and jenks would be two.

 

[hotanez]

Dude, it's June. What Fisher says is irrelevant. He also said Bradford was our QB. Gaines is EASILY the best CB on this team. Jenkins is solid but makes to many selfish bonehead plays. The

I understand it's June but if Jenkins is on one side all the time and the other 2 players are rotating at the the other spot what does that say? And Bradford was our QB till he got traded. Now Fisher said Foles is our QB, should I believe him now? My point is Jenkins takes the other teams #1wr till that changes he's our #1 corner.

 

[Mister Sin]

I'll believe it when I see it. I would love him to get his shit together, and make good choices. But I don't see it.

 

[hotanez]

I'll believe it when I see it. I would love him to get his crap together, and make good choices. But I don't see it.

Don't mistake what I'm saying Juggernauto I definitely believe that Jenkins needs to get better and his play leaves a lot to be desired but until somebody shows that their better he's our #1 by default.

 

[bwdenverram]

I like JJ, but Peterson is a better overall player and rarely gets beat deep.