- Joined
- Apr 21, 2013
- Messages
- 5,348
Not saying that I want him . But with Denver supposedly going to Tag miller. Brock will most likely hit market. If so would you be mad if rams signed him
Is Brock Osweiler a option?
- Thread starter lockdnram21
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
- Messages
- 18,666
- Name
- Dave
He's a good QB, coming from a good Team, Why not!! But I don't see the Bronco's letting him go with-out a fight!!
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2013
- Messages
- 22,999
- Name
- Dennis
I don't see John Elway and the Broncos letting him get away, however, he could play hardball which could handcuff the Broncos because they have cap issues and they will use their franchise tag on Miller.
Overall I'm not counting on Osweiler on hitting the market.
Overall I'm not counting on Osweiler on hitting the market.
woofwoofmo
65 Toss Power Trap
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2014
- Messages
- 598
G Att Comp Pct Att/G Yds Avg Yds/G TD TD% Int Int% Lng 20+ 40+ Sck SckY Rate
A 6 125 76 60.8 20.8 828 6.6 138 4 3.2 1 0.8 60T 7 2 4 28 87.7
B 8 275 170 61.8 34.4 1,967 7.2 245 10 3.6 6 2.2 72T 17 4 23 151 86.4
Which QB would you take?? A or B? Overall stats are fairly similar in % Comp, Avg Yds Catch, TD%, & QB rating. QB B has a higher interception rate and is much more likely to be sacked. QB A threw the ball about half as often as QB B. QB B had a much better receiving corps to work with.
QB A = Case Keenum
QB B = Brock Osweiler
Not sure the money spent on a big contract to Osweiler would get you a whole lot more than what you currently have with Keenum. Granted the sample size is small, but if I'm spending big bucks on a FA QB, I want a proven commodity.
A 6 125 76 60.8 20.8 828 6.6 138 4 3.2 1 0.8 60T 7 2 4 28 87.7
B 8 275 170 61.8 34.4 1,967 7.2 245 10 3.6 6 2.2 72T 17 4 23 151 86.4
Which QB would you take?? A or B? Overall stats are fairly similar in % Comp, Avg Yds Catch, TD%, & QB rating. QB B has a higher interception rate and is much more likely to be sacked. QB A threw the ball about half as often as QB B. QB B had a much better receiving corps to work with.
QB A = Case Keenum
QB B = Brock Osweiler
Not sure the money spent on a big contract to Osweiler would get you a whole lot more than what you currently have with Keenum. Granted the sample size is small, but if I'm spending big bucks on a FA QB, I want a proven commodity.
Last edited:
Elmgrovegnome
Legend
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2013
- Messages
- 22,770
Depends on the cost, but if it is high, no thanks. He has not proven himself worth a big contract.
Couldn't Denver Transition tag him? Or can they only use one tag per offseason?
Couldn't Denver Transition tag him? Or can they only use one tag per offseason?
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
- Messages
- 23,279
- Name
- mojo
- Joined
- May 8, 2014
- Messages
- 39,672
I think Osweiler hits FA. Why? Because Elway doesn't settle.
If they do bring him back it will be at a non-bank-breaking rate. And they'll probably move up in the draft for one of those 3 QBs.
If they do bring him back it will be at a non-bank-breaking rate. And they'll probably move up in the draft for one of those 3 QBs.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 24,019
With the exception of the New England game, he was pretty mediocre IMO.
I could see him become successful in Denver but only because of his familiarity with the players and scheme.
Poor mans Matt Cassell
I could see him become successful in Denver but only because of his familiarity with the players and scheme.
Poor mans Matt Cassell