- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 30,661
It's not all Sherman. I never said that. And btw... our WR's have been falling well shy of 700 yards even with Bradford.
And yeah, I'm sure Danny would've hit 1,000 yards.Actually, he wasn't on pace. He averaged 60 yards per game that season. 60 x 16 = 968 (not only do you have to use hypothetical situations, you have to round up in those fantasy scenarios too). And Quick? The guy had 53 combined yards in his last three games... it's quite a leap to assume he would've kept pace.
Is that Sherman's fault? No. I'm not blaming him, but I'm certainly not giving him credit yet either, and that's my point. You missed it.
Actually, he was on pace. I said BEFORE HIS INJURY. He was on pace for 1264 yards.
Yes. Quick. You're trying to count a game where he was injured after 11 snaps. That's just dishonest.
It's not quite a leap to believe he would have kept up a good pace.
I didn't miss your point. I saw a bad argument and I attacked it. I hate that 700 yard argument. I will credit Sherman because I can visibly see our WRs improving.