Game Winning Int. Was it?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
kurtfaulk

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
17,957
ROD Credit 2025
43,804
.

The interception that wasn't is being called the game winning interception. But would it have been really?

The Broncos still had 3 time outs and there was more than a minute on the clock.

We all remember what should have been the game winning int against the seagulls last season. Mcvay called the most Bland runs that were snuffed out very easily for a very meh 3 and out. Then the special teams gave up a td. And just like that the game wasn't over.

What's to say Mcvay wouldn't have done the same thing in this game. I don't think I've ever seen Mcvay get a 1st down to ice a game. I'm sure he has but I don't remember any.

.
 
Broncos woulda forced a 3 and out. Got the ball near midfield with just under a minute. Nix woulda found wide open receivers and they woulda marched into the endzone for the game winning TD anyway. The difference is, we wouldn't had enough time left to end the drive in the redzone. In other words, we still woulda lost.
 
  • HaHa
  • Not So Sure
  • Chill
Reactions: So Ram, Ramlock, RamFanInPC and 2 others
snackdaddy said:
Broncos woulda forced a 3 and out. Got the ball near midfield with just under a minute. Nix woulda found wide open receivers and they woulda marched into the endzone for the game winning TD anyway. The difference is, we wouldn't had enough time left to end the drive in the redzone. In other words, we still woulda lost.
Click to expand...
I don't think so, not if the ball was out in Kyrens hand. He was not going to let us lose that game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RamFanWA and LARAMSinFeb.
snackdaddy said:
Broncos woulda forced a 3 and out. Got the ball near midfield with just under a minute. Nix woulda found wide open receivers and they woulda marched into the endzone for the game winning TD anyway. The difference is, we wouldn't had enough time left to end the drive in the redzone. In other words, we still woulda lost.
Click to expand...
Wow, that's assuming a lot!!!!
 
  • 3Like
  • High Five
Reactions: RamFan58years, Ramlock, Ballhawk and 2 others
AZRams said:

View: https://x.com/tjmcaulay/status/2104712444404765052?s=20


An attempt to add context to the play. He's getting flamed for it by the moron brigade...
Click to expand...


McVay: “I didn’t have any additional coaching points for how Josh Wallace played through the snap.”
emoji_u1f606.png
Brutal
 
  • 3Like
  • HaHa
  • High Five
Reactions: Ramlock, RamsTheirWife, RamBall and 2 others
  • Like
Reactions: RamsTheirWife
Regardless of the INT/DPI call, the call on Lake #37 was even more egregious IMO. That's where we are at now? Every time a player grazes a facemask, its illegal hands to face?

Let's look at the timeline:

1:01 left on the clock, Lake grazes facemask of WR
0:59 ball leaves Nix's hand
0:57 its clear the ball is going to land out of bounds, and the flag is thrown.

Flag thrown FOUR seconds after the "infraction".
 
  • Like
  • High Five
  • Thread Winner
Reactions: RamFanWA, Ramlock, kmramsfan and 3 others
Maybe we need an embellishment law and adjoining PF, this could help trigger a review or open up the option of a coaches challenge.
 
A lot of talk on the DPI, but I don’t think there’s enough mention of the Phantom Lake hands to the face call

Interesting I didn’t notice when the flag was thrown, but if that’s the case, it’s a pretty clear case of let’s keep the donkeys rolling
 
  • Like
  • High Five
Reactions: RamFanWA, majrleaged and Ramlock
Ground Chuck said:
A lot of talk on the DPI, but I don’t think there’s enough mention of the Phantom Lake hands to the face call

Interesting I didn’t notice when the flag was thrown, but if that’s the case, it’s a pretty clear case of let’s keep the donkeys rolling
Click to expand...

It was a 3rd down play that was incomplete. So the Rams stopped the Broncos twice only to have the refs throw a flag to extend the drive.

.
 
  • 3Like
  • High Five
Reactions: RamFanWA, majrleaged, Ramlock and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back