FAA approves cranes for Inglewood stadium

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
40,617
Just as we knew it would happen they've approved the first couple cranes for construction.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/12/23/faa-approves-cranes-for-kroenkeworld/


The light is green for the construction of a stadium that will cost, and generate, plenty of it.

Via Nathan Fenno of the Los Angeles Times, the FAA has approved the use of the first two large cranes that will be used to build the the new Rams stadium in Inglewood.

The agency has determined that the cranes will not present a hazard to aviation at the nearby LAX airport.

Despite the permission to use the cranes, the overall design of the venue is still under review, given concerns regarding possible interference with radar at LAX. Confidence remains that the issue will be rectified, eventually.

Per Fenno, eight other applications are pending for cranes that would be used to build the venue with an estimated cost of $2.6 billion.

The Rams will begin playing there in 2019, joined possibly (probably) by the Chargers.
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
how in the hell would cranes bother/disrupt/interfere with airway traffic? Unless sully is flying over.....
 

ReddingRam

Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,459
how in the hell would cranes bother/disrupt/interfere with airway traffic? Unless sully is flying over.....
They are very tall cranes and could interfere with the radar for ATC. The Inglewood stadium in in the inbound flight path for LAX
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
40,617
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #4
how in the hell would cranes bother/disrupt/interfere with airway traffic? Unless sully is flying over.....
The issue was first brought up by Tom Ridge who was tied financially to the Carson project. His past with the Homeland Security department made some people think there was an issue with it. But once the FAA actually looked into it they apparently found no issues and the project is going forward.