ESPN NFC West Blogger Mike Sando

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

News Bot

01001000 01101001
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
2,624
Name
News Bot
[rp3]http://icestream.dev-cms.com:8000/stl/2013/02/02262013121323.mp3[/rp3]
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.101sports.com/templates/audio_player.php?a=13160&type=s" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.101sports.com/templates/audi ... 160&type=s</a>

ESPN NFC West Blogger Mike Sando discusses Steven Jackson's future and
explains why the hiccups he had with the Rams are "totally a money issue".













.
 

News Bot

01001000 01101001
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
2,624
Name
News Bot
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #2
Mike Sando
<a class="postlink" href="http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/92452/101espn-st-louis-audio-miklasz-show-51" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/ ... sz-show-51</a>


We've been heavy on the Steven Jackson discussion following news of the running back's expected free agency. That will continue here as I pass along audio from my my Tuesday conversation with Bernie Miklasz of 101ESPN St. Louis.

Bernie and I touched on a few other mostly Rams-related subjects. Bernie has subsequently filed thoughts on what Jackson's departure might mean to the Rams. He notes that Jackson's touches and production suffered year-over-year declines recently.

The chart compares Jackson's rushing yards per season by age to NFL averages since 2000 for running backs with at least 150 carries in four or more seasons.

Jackson has outperformed the averages, but the rate of decline in recent seasons matches league averages for running backs of the same age. Those other running backs suffered a 23.9 percent decline from age 29 to age 30, the second-largest percentage decline in the chart. That percentage represented the difference from a 719-yard average at age 29 to a 547-yard average at age 30.

Jackson would fall short of 800 yards in 2013 if he followed a similar course. His yardage totals have declined by 12.9, 7.7 and 9.0 percent over the past three seasons.

cf374839a318418da419618.png
 

Username

Has a Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Messages
5,763
I love SJ, but that chart shows 1. He's above average. Something we've known for a long time. Then 2. The NFL average for his age in the next couple of years declines significantly.
 

BatteringRambo

Inked Gym Rat Stoner
Joined
Jul 7, 2010
Messages
3,893
Name
J.Fo
I get the stats and all however Sjax is special as in his continual I can't even puts words or a description to even justify justice..he's a fuckin human T2 specimen. Yes a legit very rare, unreal physical beast...age is just a number to associate to him. :cool:
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 

Stranger

How big is infinity?
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
7,182
Name
Hugh
I also wonder what were the primary causes for the drop in season yardage for running backs older than 29? For example, was it simply number of total carries? I mean, that stat chart doesn't complete the picture for me, as I'd also like to see total carries and avg yds per carry for running backs by age.
 

DR RAM

Rams Lifer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
12,111
Name
Rambeau
BatteringRambo said:
I get the stats and all however Sjax is special as in his continual I can't even puts words or a description to even justify justice..he's a fuckin human T2 specimen. Yes a legit very rare, unreal physical beast...age is just a number to associate to him. :cool:
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I found this rare picture of SJ without his dreads wig, and sans uniform:

terminator-3_288x288.jpg
images
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuXrLj5QqNI[/youtube]
 

fearsomefour

Legend
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
17,453
No one is immune to the ravages of time. Look at Emmitt Smith, L.T. (RB not LB) or our own Marshal Faulk. Once that little extra step is gone it gets tough fast. Jackson was never a huge breakaway runner but he is not as fast as he used to be. Thats ok, keeping him should still be a priority. I do think either Atlanta or Green Bay will pay more than the Rams are willing to give for him and he walks. Keeping Amendola then needs to become a priority. I think New England (with Mcdouche at OC) will be willing to give him a nice raise (but still quite a bit less than Wes Welker would demand) and make a run at him. The risk of course is the injuries, but, I do believe in that short route/slot roll he is basically uncoverable. Losing Amendola will have a major negative impact on the Rams O. Its sort of hard to not be frustrated with the Rams being smashed against the cap with all the terrible teams they have had recently. Bad choices and bad contracts I guess. Bradford needs to rework his deal to free up some space.
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
34,840
Name
Stu
I can see these stats being more relevant to a shifty type runner. SJ's game is based on power running. I also think that if you look at the decline in his numbers, it is more about having some other viable options to take some of the load off. Work it out guys. Retire the man in horns and then move on to other pressing needs.