I estimate there are over 500 players drafted, signed as UDFA, or offered tryouts annually. While I watch some college football games, I don't study every game from every team. That means, I only see the big plays from most games and only see glimpses of the performance of "non-skilled" positions. With the exception of The Todd Gurley pick; which I love, I do not have an informed opinion on the strengths and upside potential of the big uglies we drafted. Further, when you factor in changes in position, i.e., tackle to guard, a quick evaluation of a draft is very hard. That's why I think draft grades are stupid. Criticism for not selecting positional players of need is valid, but criticism over drafting a specific player is tough.
I am happy with the draft as we addressed needs at OL. I would have like a FS and ILB. Other than those positions, I have no complaints. History has shown us that just because a player has a recognizable name at draft time, doesn't mean he will be most successful at his position.
Beauty is in the beholder. I like tall buxom blondes with long flowing hair. Someone else may prefer tall buxom gingers with shorter hair. Either way, we both can get what we want.....to tap that ass!