- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 49,232
- Name
- Burger man
Not only did Fisher's Rams lose too much... they were not much fun to watch. Run first. High percentage passing. Careful with the football. Bend don't break defense. Keep the game close. Etc.
Simply put; Fisher's approach, even when it worked, was... well... boring.
The NFL/Rams are selling entertainment. We watch to have fun. So even when winning... I wonder if the Ram's brass (Kevin D and Kroenke) felt they had a product the fans wanted?
Fast forward to today.
McVay brings the promise of a creative offense. The Rams will score more. Is that enough to make the Rams enjoyable even if they lose?
The short answer is; probably not. Winning trumps all.
Or... maybe not completely?
For me, it comes down to believing in the actions of a team. I can handle second guessing if we should have done this or that (in game decisions)... But I had a really hard time aligning to Fisher's game strategy. I didn't believe in it.
So, under McVay, if the game strategy is something I align with... will I enjoy the team more?
Not sure if this makes any sense? Hopefully I've described it well enough for you to comment.
Simply put; Fisher's approach, even when it worked, was... well... boring.
The NFL/Rams are selling entertainment. We watch to have fun. So even when winning... I wonder if the Ram's brass (Kevin D and Kroenke) felt they had a product the fans wanted?
Fast forward to today.
McVay brings the promise of a creative offense. The Rams will score more. Is that enough to make the Rams enjoyable even if they lose?
The short answer is; probably not. Winning trumps all.
Or... maybe not completely?
For me, it comes down to believing in the actions of a team. I can handle second guessing if we should have done this or that (in game decisions)... But I had a really hard time aligning to Fisher's game strategy. I didn't believe in it.
So, under McVay, if the game strategy is something I align with... will I enjoy the team more?
Not sure if this makes any sense? Hopefully I've described it well enough for you to comment.