- Joined
- Oct 28, 2012
- Messages
- 2,215
- Name
- Dale
Sorry to make a separate thread about tonight's game but I think it needs to be brought to our attention.
So the Carolina receiver stepped out of bounds then comes back in bounds and makes a catch. The original ruling was incomplete because he did not re-establish himself back in the field of play. Booth review says he did establish himself back in the field of play but because he was the first to touch the ball (the catch) it is a foul and a 5 yard penalty.
I bring this up because of the fair catch call by Marquez in the Seattle game. You remember, the onside kick that Jeff Triplet thought had already touched the ground before he made the fair catch signal? That penalty was overturned due to some fast action by the Dome's big screen operator. But where was the subsequent penalty for hitting a playing making a fair catch?
So it seams a penalty can be retroactively applied during a review. Remember this.
So the Carolina receiver stepped out of bounds then comes back in bounds and makes a catch. The original ruling was incomplete because he did not re-establish himself back in the field of play. Booth review says he did establish himself back in the field of play but because he was the first to touch the ball (the catch) it is a foul and a 5 yard penalty.
I bring this up because of the fair catch call by Marquez in the Seattle game. You remember, the onside kick that Jeff Triplet thought had already touched the ground before he made the fair catch signal? That penalty was overturned due to some fast action by the Dome's big screen operator. But where was the subsequent penalty for hitting a playing making a fair catch?
So it seams a penalty can be retroactively applied during a review. Remember this.