- Joined
- May 25, 2013
- Messages
- 1,295
Fisher and Schottenheimer are considering and beginning to employ a devastating offensive philosophy. What if the basis of the offense is to put too many variables on the field for the defense to prepare an adequate gameplan that can be executed? Let's consider that every skill position player other than Bradford was acquired PRECISELY because they are all special in only one or two regards? Quick and Pettis are the fast and tall Split Ends that you only gamble to leave in single coverage because the Red Zone is their forte. Bailey is Givens without the drops, technicians who understand route running and stretch the field (oh, how I miss Ellard, Bruce, and Holt). Austin is the little guy that requires another quick twitch defender or six points will be quickly conceded and he can be augmented or replaced by guys like Givens, Bailey, and Helmick. Kendricks and Cook can overpower nickel and dime personnel as can physical backs like Stacy, Ganaway, and Cunningham. Pead and Richarson can threaten the perimeter of most any defense. The flexibility of this offense has the potential to attack any defensive philosophy in the league.
By now the premise is obvious, there is no need to glorify any of the offensive weapons. This is a team that will stress opponents by waves of diversity. A big, physical backfield like Seattle could be destroyed by a Run and Shoot scheme that uses Pead or Richardson along with Austin, Givens, and Bailey. A small defensive backfield would struggle to contain Kendricks, Cook, Pettis, and Quick as well as the power backs like Ganaway and Stacy. Every play could bring a fresh set of mismatches in any combination with the depth to continue the gameplan even in the event of injury. Running Austin and Cook down the seam together with a sudden break by either would be a safety's nightmare.
My angle is not that the Rams will be reinventing the wheel. X,Y, and Z receivers still remain. Running backs by committee are now the norm. Fielding three tight ends or lining up with an empty backfield is nothing new. Even lining up with four wide can end up being a run by Austin after he goes into motion. Teams will attempt to teach their defenses about Ram tendencies depending on the personnel grouping and the Rams would be prepared to counter with something unexpected.
Provided Bradford and the Oline remain healthy, I'm predicting a top ten offense in 2013 by philosophy and talent alone.
By now the premise is obvious, there is no need to glorify any of the offensive weapons. This is a team that will stress opponents by waves of diversity. A big, physical backfield like Seattle could be destroyed by a Run and Shoot scheme that uses Pead or Richardson along with Austin, Givens, and Bailey. A small defensive backfield would struggle to contain Kendricks, Cook, Pettis, and Quick as well as the power backs like Ganaway and Stacy. Every play could bring a fresh set of mismatches in any combination with the depth to continue the gameplan even in the event of injury. Running Austin and Cook down the seam together with a sudden break by either would be a safety's nightmare.
My angle is not that the Rams will be reinventing the wheel. X,Y, and Z receivers still remain. Running backs by committee are now the norm. Fielding three tight ends or lining up with an empty backfield is nothing new. Even lining up with four wide can end up being a run by Austin after he goes into motion. Teams will attempt to teach their defenses about Ram tendencies depending on the personnel grouping and the Rams would be prepared to counter with something unexpected.
Provided Bradford and the Oline remain healthy, I'm predicting a top ten offense in 2013 by philosophy and talent alone.