Colts future not as bright as it seems

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,225
Name
Burger man
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/13013357/why-indianapolis-colts-future-bright-seems-nfl

In 2012, the Indianapolis Colts got lucky.

Andrew Luck was available as the first pick in the draft. General manager Ryan Grigson surrounded him with a great stable of young draft choices, including tight ends Coby Fleener and Dwayne Allen, wide receiver T.Y. Hilton and running back Vick Ballard. The Colts rebounded with three straight division titles and three 11-win seasons, including last season's run to the AFC Championship Game.

From the outside, though, it seemed a little strange to see the Colts sign six new starters this offseason whose average age is 31.2. Frank Gore, Andre Johnson, Todd Herremans, Trent Cole, Kendall Langford and Dwight Loweryjoin what was already the league's oldest roster in 2014, with an average age of 27.5, according to Elias.

What's clear is the biological clock is ticking on the Colts, even though Luck is only 25 years old. It might not be now or never for Luck to get to his first Super Bowl, but the Colts could be heading down the path of five other franchises that have quality quarterbacks. Teams that don't hit on two or three starters in each draft class eventually suffer roster decay -- and that's the position in which the Colts currently find themselves.

The Falcons are a recent cautionary tale.

In 2008, Atlanta started their roster reconstruction by taking Matt Ryan at No. 3 overall, and then selecting Sam Baker, Curtis Lofton, Harry Douglas, Thomas DeCoud and Kroy Biermann in the draft and signing Michael Turner at running back. The next year, they traded for tight end Tony Gonzalez . By 2010, the Falcons were 13-3 and won 26 games over a three-year period.

But drafts from 2010 to 2012 didn't successfully fill the roster attrition that happens to every team after the first three to five years. Despite having an elite quarterback, the Falcons have won just 10 games over the past two seasons. Similar things have happened to the New Orleans Saints, Carolina Panthers, New York Giants and Chicago Bears in recent seasons (although the Bears' quarterback situation isn't nearly as strong as the aforementioned teams).

This is a critical season for the Colts. Their 2013 and 2014 drafts haven't filled needs on defense. Bjoern Werner started 15 games at linebacker last year, but he wasn't a difference-maker while filling in for the injured (and aging) Robert Mathis. With the signing of Trent Cole at outside linebacker and Mathis' possible return by September, Werner might be a backup this season.

To fill needs and improve on defense, Grigson has relied heavily on free agency and a trade to land cornerback Vontae Davis. As of the end of last season, the only drafted starters on defense were Werner and nose tackle Josh Chapman. That's a concern, because the successful shelf life of free-agent signings is often two or three seasons. In other words, they've made some short-term fixes that could pay off in 2015 -- but the longer-term outlook is more of a concern, even with the presence of Luck, and especially if any of the Jaguars, Texans or Titans make marked improvements over the next two seasons in the AFC South.

The "win-now" approach taken this offseason is probably the right one. Luck will be the anchor of the franchise and should get a huge second contract next year, and given Tom Brady's suspension in New England and Peyton Manning's decline in play at the end of last season, there's no reason to think the Colts won't be one of the top contenders in the AFC again. That said, remember that the Colts have a lot of flexibility now because Luck is paid far less than his market value. Once you're paying full freight for a player of his caliber, it won't be as easy to shop in free agency to fill holes the draft isn't taking care of. So the potential roster drain ahead and improvements of competitors in the AFC South -- face it, the Colts have had it good in that division during Luck's tenure -- could make it hard to stay at the 11-win level by 2017 and 2018, particularly if the Colts continue to have to rely on free agency more than the draft.

The Colts don't need to be lucky this year. They need to be really, really good.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,225
Name
Burger man
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #2
I've always thought the Colts were more a product of their division than a true SB threat.

This year looks no different but those free agents should help.
 

Big Willie

Starter
Joined
Aug 24, 2014
Messages
763
Luck is a special, special player and improves the level of the team around him. As we saw when the Rams played the Colts, a power running team with a physical DL will give the Colts nightmares and their lack of a power running game (more because of the OL than the RB) will hold them back against NFC West teams...who seem more inclined to play old school rock'em sock'em football.
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
16,597
.

Have the Colts ever been within 3 tds when they have played the Patriots? They've been blown out 5 or 6 times with Luck at qb. Won't be doing anything with that kind of record.

.
 

RAGRam

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 14, 2015
Messages
1,150
I sometimes wonder if having a really good QB and an easy schedule holds you back and masks a lot of your failings when it comes to the post season.
 

Akrasian

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
4,936
IMO, the Colts are a Super Bowl threat as long as luck is there and playing well.

It's a combination of Luck and the division. Until the division improves, with Luck they should win the division with a good enough record to skip the Wild Card round and have at least 1 home game in the playoffs. That way they only need to win their home game and find a way to win 1 game on the road - which can happen with a good game for them. Then they are in the Super Bowl and unless they are playing Green Bay likely have the better QB in the game.

Yes, NE has owned them - that won't necessarily continue though. Or NE could get bounced early or something, or miss the playoffs with having to use properly inflated balls or whatever.
 

Ram_Rally

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
5,958
IMO, the Colts are a Super Bowl threat as long as luck is there and playing well.

I think it's more because of convenience honestly. They're gonna win 12 games thanks to their division. After that they only need 2 wins to be super bowl bound
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
Langford should really help that run D...Trent Cole too...but meh, they seem to be missing so many pieces...esp O-Line. Luck can't mask everything...
 

HE WITH HORNS

Hall of Fame
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
3,992
So wait, the oldest team in the NFL has 3 straight 11 win seasons?

And why do the Rams insist on being the youngest team every single year?
 

Rams43

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 20, 2014
Messages
4,195
I do remember that as well. I'm just not sold on the whole being the youngest team thing has worked out so well for us either.

A bit of flawed logic, Horns.

A team would be foolish NOT to add talented rookies via draft and UDFA, when available.

But rookies tend to be young and thus lower the average age on your roster.

Our players will gain experience while the talent is already in place.

Another factor is that we've had more than our share of picks as a result of numerous trades, which further reduces the average roster age. By and large, S&F have picked well. Is that a BAD thing?

Finally, other than at the QB position, don't we prefer our roster to that of the Colts? I sure do.