- Joined
- Feb 9, 2014
- Messages
- 20,922
- Name
- Peter
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...-move-in-on-the-jilted-fanbase-next-door-yet/
Chiefs aren’t ready to move in on the jilted fanbase next door — yet
Posted by Darin Gantt on March 25, 2016
Getty Images
The Chiefs seem perfectly willing to hit on the saucy divorcee down the street. But they want to give it enough time so they’re not so blatantly the rebound guy.
With the Rams packing up and heading to Los Angeles, Chiefs officials know there’s a half of Missouri without an NFL allegiance now, and admit they’ll probably eventually try to win them over. But maybe not just yet.
“We’re going to be very cautious, we’re going to be very respectful,”Chiefs president Mark Donovan said, via Terez Paylor of the Kansas City Star. “They’ve been through a process, and their fans, they’ve been through a lot. We’re gonna be very cautious, we’re going to be patient. We are going to take opportunities as they come.”
Of course, Donovan isn’t going to lie, having that empty blue swath of what used to be a fanbase just sitting there isn’t something they’re going to ignore.
“It expands our reach, it activates another market of potential fans, potential marketing partners,” Donovan said. “It’s a big market that’s nearby, so you want to active there if it makes sense to be there.”
Chiefs owner Clark Hunt said at the Super Bowl they didn’t have “any specific plans to go market in St. Louis,” but that was again very conditional based on the timing of the move.
They’re also worried about the possibility of residual anger in St. Louis, since Hunt was the only member of the L.A. committee who initially backed the Rams-Inglewood project, betting on the right horse when it was time for the full membership to vote. But Hunt said his preference was for the Rams to stay in St. Louis.
“I was in disagreement with the rest of the committee because I felt that the league would be better served by less relocation, because it’s less disruptive for the fanbases,” Hunt said. “I had hoped that there would be an outcome that possibly one of the California teams would end up moving to LA, because it was clear to me that somebody was going to move to LA — the league had been trying to do it for 20 years — and there was momentum for it.
“But I wasn’t in favorite of two teams moving. I certainly hoped that the Rams were gonna stay in St. Louis, but that’s not the way it turned out.”
And, you know, if they eventually want to come over and have a drink some time, that’ll be OK too.
Chiefs aren’t ready to move in on the jilted fanbase next door — yet
Posted by Darin Gantt on March 25, 2016
The Chiefs seem perfectly willing to hit on the saucy divorcee down the street. But they want to give it enough time so they’re not so blatantly the rebound guy.
With the Rams packing up and heading to Los Angeles, Chiefs officials know there’s a half of Missouri without an NFL allegiance now, and admit they’ll probably eventually try to win them over. But maybe not just yet.
“We’re going to be very cautious, we’re going to be very respectful,”Chiefs president Mark Donovan said, via Terez Paylor of the Kansas City Star. “They’ve been through a process, and their fans, they’ve been through a lot. We’re gonna be very cautious, we’re going to be patient. We are going to take opportunities as they come.”
Of course, Donovan isn’t going to lie, having that empty blue swath of what used to be a fanbase just sitting there isn’t something they’re going to ignore.
“It expands our reach, it activates another market of potential fans, potential marketing partners,” Donovan said. “It’s a big market that’s nearby, so you want to active there if it makes sense to be there.”
Chiefs owner Clark Hunt said at the Super Bowl they didn’t have “any specific plans to go market in St. Louis,” but that was again very conditional based on the timing of the move.
They’re also worried about the possibility of residual anger in St. Louis, since Hunt was the only member of the L.A. committee who initially backed the Rams-Inglewood project, betting on the right horse when it was time for the full membership to vote. But Hunt said his preference was for the Rams to stay in St. Louis.
“I was in disagreement with the rest of the committee because I felt that the league would be better served by less relocation, because it’s less disruptive for the fanbases,” Hunt said. “I had hoped that there would be an outcome that possibly one of the California teams would end up moving to LA, because it was clear to me that somebody was going to move to LA — the league had been trying to do it for 20 years — and there was momentum for it.
“But I wasn’t in favorite of two teams moving. I certainly hoped that the Rams were gonna stay in St. Louis, but that’s not the way it turned out.”
And, you know, if they eventually want to come over and have a drink some time, that’ll be OK too.