I'm switching thigs up with the order this time. Let's jump to the end with the conclusion, then we'll work our way back to the beginning and I'll eventually explain how I arrived at his draft grade.
Part 4: Draft Grade and Pro Comp
Third round grade. Pro comparison Terry McLaurin (middle of 3rd round 2019, Washington Commodes, Ohio State)
McLaurin had very limited receiving production in college. His final season at OSU, he had 35 catches for 701 yards. It was the only season of his career where he posted at least 500 receiving yards. McLaurin isn't very tall; he's just a hair over 6 feet tall. I really liked McLaurin, but to be fair, I also liked JJ Arcega-Whiteside, who was a big draft bust. For the draft experts that had McLaurin graded high, it was primarily based on his traits and how he performed at the Senior Bowl, it wasn't based off of proven statistical production in college.
Most experts graded McLaurin as a Day 2 prospect. Some of the things they said about him prior to the draft: (+) Detailed route runner, clean releases and hard to jam, fluid and active hips, quick and light feet, legitimate deep threat, crisp angles out of breaks, physical at top of route, good focus on ball, DaeSean Hamilton comp (-) Average tape, faster than quick, build-up speed, body catcher lacking in ball skills, rarely wins contested catches, doesn't high-point the football, lacks suddenness to separate, below average blocker, takes false steps in releases, plays smaller than listed size, not a threat to run through traffic or make contested catches, struggles catching passes outside his frame, limited catch radius.
McLaurin was in a very weak WR draft class. There were zero WRs taken that year prior to slot 25. Even so, this vacuum failed to push McLaurin up the board. He was taken in the area of the draft you'd expect to see a complementary WR3 or a good backup get drafted. Everyone ended up being wrong about McLaurin. He was an instant impact rookie and became a 1,000-yard receiving machine in the NFL, making multiple Pro Bowls.
The reason I don't have Wesco graded even higher is that over the years there have been other WRs that I felt were even better prospects. Some of them flopped, others have been average, a few have done very well. If you put Wesco in the very deep 2024 WR draft class, I wouldn't have taken him until the late 3rd round, maybe early 4th round. Just too many other quality WRs still available.
Nevertheless, I went with McLaurin as Wesco's comp for a reason. I wanted to drive home the point that 4 years from now, we might be saying that Wesco was the best WR to emerge from the 2027 draft class. Notwithstanding the studs at the top of the board like Jeremiah Smith. I wouldn't bet money on that outcome, but it wouldn't shock me. There are many aspects to Wesco's game that I feel translate very well to pro ball. I think he could be more productive in the NFL than he's been so far in college. Wesco is a problem. There were times during his games where it felt to me that the only reason the opposing defense could stop him is because the rest of Clemson's team wasn't good enough. Take him out of that "bad" situation and put him in a better situation with let's say a future NFL HOF QB and you could see fireworks.
Bryant Wesco Jr. might be flying under the radar at the moment, but he is a name that Rams fans need to know entering the 2026 college season.
Part 4: Draft Grade and Pro Comp
Third round grade. Pro comparison Terry McLaurin (middle of 3rd round 2019, Washington Commodes, Ohio State)
McLaurin had very limited receiving production in college. His final season at OSU, he had 35 catches for 701 yards. It was the only season of his career where he posted at least 500 receiving yards. McLaurin isn't very tall; he's just a hair over 6 feet tall. I really liked McLaurin, but to be fair, I also liked JJ Arcega-Whiteside, who was a big draft bust. For the draft experts that had McLaurin graded high, it was primarily based on his traits and how he performed at the Senior Bowl, it wasn't based off of proven statistical production in college.
Most experts graded McLaurin as a Day 2 prospect. Some of the things they said about him prior to the draft: (+) Detailed route runner, clean releases and hard to jam, fluid and active hips, quick and light feet, legitimate deep threat, crisp angles out of breaks, physical at top of route, good focus on ball, DaeSean Hamilton comp (-) Average tape, faster than quick, build-up speed, body catcher lacking in ball skills, rarely wins contested catches, doesn't high-point the football, lacks suddenness to separate, below average blocker, takes false steps in releases, plays smaller than listed size, not a threat to run through traffic or make contested catches, struggles catching passes outside his frame, limited catch radius.
McLaurin was in a very weak WR draft class. There were zero WRs taken that year prior to slot 25. Even so, this vacuum failed to push McLaurin up the board. He was taken in the area of the draft you'd expect to see a complementary WR3 or a good backup get drafted. Everyone ended up being wrong about McLaurin. He was an instant impact rookie and became a 1,000-yard receiving machine in the NFL, making multiple Pro Bowls.
The reason I don't have Wesco graded even higher is that over the years there have been other WRs that I felt were even better prospects. Some of them flopped, others have been average, a few have done very well. If you put Wesco in the very deep 2024 WR draft class, I wouldn't have taken him until the late 3rd round, maybe early 4th round. Just too many other quality WRs still available.
Nevertheless, I went with McLaurin as Wesco's comp for a reason. I wanted to drive home the point that 4 years from now, we might be saying that Wesco was the best WR to emerge from the 2027 draft class. Notwithstanding the studs at the top of the board like Jeremiah Smith. I wouldn't bet money on that outcome, but it wouldn't shock me. There are many aspects to Wesco's game that I feel translate very well to pro ball. I think he could be more productive in the NFL than he's been so far in college. Wesco is a problem. There were times during his games where it felt to me that the only reason the opposing defense could stop him is because the rest of Clemson's team wasn't good enough. Take him out of that "bad" situation and put him in a better situation with let's say a future NFL HOF QB and you could see fireworks.
Bryant Wesco Jr. might be flying under the radar at the moment, but he is a name that Rams fans need to know entering the 2026 college season.