- Joined
- Apr 11, 2013
- Messages
- 5,378
- Name
- Sin
That is more excited about Bailey than Austin? The more I think about it, the more I feel like Bailey can be a legit starter and possibly be a very very good player.
El Juggernauto said:That is more excited about Bailey than Austin? The more I think about it, the more I feel like Bailey can be a legit starter and possibly be a very very good player.
Yep. Han Solo.Selassie I said:Yeah,,, I think you're Solo-Bono on this one.
I'm more excited over Austin lining up on gameday somewhere behind the LOS than Steadman...but i'm with you that Bailey may be...quite possibly...circumstantially....potentially be a better pro WR when all is said and done.El Juggernauto said:That is more excited about Bailey than Austin? The more I think about it, the more I feel like Bailey can be a legit starter and possibly be a very very good player.
GreeneCounty said:The great thing is we do not have to worry about Sam having piss poor wideouts this year. Givens was solid last year and sorry but Amedola was not the guy to make this wideout core better.
Faceplant said:Bailey is to Austin as Maclin is to Jackson in Philly. That's kinda how I see it. If we can get that kind of production, I think we will all be pleased. That said, I think Austin > Jackson...... and I don't think it's close either.
The Dude said:You might be the only one, though Bailey does look to be a very well-rounded receiver. But as far as pure playmaking ability goes, I don't think there's much of a contest between the two.
:lmao:El Juggernauto said:GreeneCounty said:The great thing is we do not have to worry about Sam having piss poor wideouts this year. Givens was solid last year and sorry but Amedola was not the guy to make this wideout core better.
My god, I saw your picture here and tried to hit my brake. Lol and I'm sitting in a recliner.
nighttrain said:The Dude said:You might be the only one, though Bailey does look to be a very well-rounded receiver. But as far as pure playmaking ability goes, I don't think there's much of a contest between the two.
in films I saw where they worked well together to fake defenses, that said, Austin is Kid Dynomite..
train
GreeneCounty said:nighttrain said:The Dude said:You might be the only one, though Bailey does look to be a very well-rounded receiver. But as far as pure playmaking ability goes, I don't think there's much of a contest between the two.
in films I saw where they worked well together to fake defenses, that said, Austin is Kid Dynomite..
train
I really like the fact Rams got 2 guys who played together in college and seem pretty sharp. I think this is a win win for the learning curve.
The Dude said:Seems to be a legitimate question.
[nbc]51832802[/nbc]
<a class="postlink" href="http://video.nbcsports.msnbc.com/nbc-sports/51832802#51832802" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://video.nbcsports.msnbc.com/nbc-sp ... 2#51832802</a>
Nah. It was legitimate before that. And you might have a point if Austin doesn't develop a full repertoire of routes down the road. Clearly our best hope would be that they both become monsters. Little itty biddy monsters of production. =)El Juggernauto said:The Dude said:Seems to be a legitimate question.
[nbc]51832802[/nbc]
<a class="postlink" href="http://video.nbcsports.msnbc.com/nbc-sports/51832802#51832802" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://video.nbcsports.msnbc.com/nbc-sp ... 2#51832802</a>
Haha well I'm glad my question is legitimized by the media lol.