- Joined
- Jun 20, 2014
- Messages
- 4,253
Assuming player grades are more or less equal at #23, of course.
I see lots of discussion about cornerback and edge rusher as our pick in the first round. Almost every pundit is calling for CB with that pick, in fact. But nose tackle, not so much... Why is that?
If a suitable nose tackle is there at number 23, is it not possible that that would provide the most bang for our buck? I mean, think about it.
Suitable nose tackle would “finish“ our DL. And wouldn’t it make our linebackers and cornerbacks even more effective?
I think it’s a legit question. Is a near elite NT a bigger help to our D than a near elite LB? At least on run D? Perhaps a bigger boon to our CB’s, too?
Food for thought, anyway. Or is this a chicken vs egg thing?
Probably will come down to who falls, I guess.
Any ideas out there on this? Talk to me.
I see lots of discussion about cornerback and edge rusher as our pick in the first round. Almost every pundit is calling for CB with that pick, in fact. But nose tackle, not so much... Why is that?
If a suitable nose tackle is there at number 23, is it not possible that that would provide the most bang for our buck? I mean, think about it.
Suitable nose tackle would “finish“ our DL. And wouldn’t it make our linebackers and cornerbacks even more effective?
I think it’s a legit question. Is a near elite NT a bigger help to our D than a near elite LB? At least on run D? Perhaps a bigger boon to our CB’s, too?
Food for thought, anyway. Or is this a chicken vs egg thing?
Probably will come down to who falls, I guess.
Any ideas out there on this? Talk to me.