5 teams that could trade aggressively in the 2013 NFL Draft

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
By Will Brinson | CBSSports.com
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/eye-on-football/22037703/five-teams-that-could-trade-aggressively-in-the-2013-nfl-draft" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/eye-o ... -nfl-draft</a>

50ab12f76b87d.preview-620.jpg



Breaking news: There will be trades during the first round of the 2013 NFL Draft. Maybe not as many as in 2012, when we saw an unholy number of teams move around in the first round alone (19 total, including deals made before draft day actually came around). But there will be deals made, because there are always deals made.

That's great news for teams in the top portion of the draft, all of whom would prefer to move down a few slots in order to nab some extra picks. Every single team in the top 10 can certainly find someone they like as a pick at the top of the draft, but those teams would also probably prefer to slide a few spots if it helps improve their overhaul draft haul without losing too much talent-wise.

Below I've identified a few teams that could move up in the draft -- including one already in the top 10 and a pair that might just jump back into the first round -- for the sake of identifying teams that could be particularly aggressive when it comes to draft-day trading.

As always, caveats abound, particularly with the cost of moving up and generally everything that goes into draft-day speculation ahead of time. If you've got better choices or hate my picks -- and I don't doubt you do! -- leave them in the comments or let me know on Twitter @WillBrinson.

Dolphins

Having left free agency without a sure answer at left tackle or cornerback, it seems more than reasonable the Dolphins might look to fill one of those positions come draft day. And if they do, what's to keep them from acting in the same aggressive manner they used during free agency? There's some belief Jeff Ireland's shoving his chips to the center of the table with the Fins this year and nothing says "all in" quite like giving up picks in order to grab a position of need.

Someone like Xavier Rhodes or Desmond Trufant could easily fall to Miami at 12. But two things conspire to make Miami a logical aggressor in this draft: a premium group of tackles available and, thanks to the departure of Jake Long in free agency, 2012 swinging gate Jonathan Martin manning the left tackle spot. It's unlikely that Luke Joeckel or Eric Fisher will be available, but Lane Johnson could be in Miami's wheelhouse with a move up.

49ers

San Francisco's been plenty aggressive already this offseason, fully partaking in the NFC West arms race with the Seahawks. What makes them most likely to deal though? A bevy of draft picks available to Trent Baalke. Thirteen to be exact, with five of those coming in the first 95 picks. The 49ers have been fantastic about maximizing their draft picks in recent years -- the past three years alone have yielded Mike Iupati, Anthony Davis, Navorro Bowman, Aldon Smith, Colin Kaepernick, Chris Culliver, Kendall Hunter and LaMichael James to name a few -- but with a stacked roster they might be interested in moving up to acquire premium talent.

Early on I mocked the 49ers nabbing Tavon Austin; it seems highly unlikely the explosive wideout from West Virginia will fall to 31 at this point. It's not that unrealistic to think San Francisco could go get a guy who truly makes the offense as dynamic as possible. (Plus, it would be quite the statement to the Seahawks after they traded for Percy Harvin, no?) Kenny Vaccaro or John Cyprien could also be targets at safety if the Niners don't believe they'll fall to 31. Whatever they're thinking, they've got the ammo to make a strong play and it wouldn't be shocking if they did just that.

Jets

Don't bank on new Jets GM John Idzik suddenly deciding he needs to give up a ton of assets in order to make a move up and grab a specific player in a really deep draft. But that all changes if the Jets are finally able to move Darrelle Revis to the Buccaneers and acquire Tampa Bay's 2013 first-round pick. That would give New York the ninth overall and 13th overall pick in the draft.

And it would mean if they're truly eying a defensive stud like an Ezekiel Ansah or a Dion Jordan then they have the ability to make a small jump forward without giving up too much. In other words, they could give up a later pick (third- or fourth-round value maybe?) to jump up a few spots, pick up the guy they want and still have one more first-round spot available in order to pick up another position of need. Who knows, maybe they're even itching to snag Geno Smith and don't want the Bills getting hold of him instead. It all hinges on Revis, but that doesn't seem like a huge stretch at this point; the only sticking point is getting a deal done before the draft.

Rams

And here we have another situation where a team with multiple first-round picks could get aggressive. I wouldn't expect the Rams to make a big play up the draft board unless a) they can do it reasonably cheap or b) feel like a guy they have to have is going to get snagged ahead of their first pick at 16th. I absolutely love the safety-wideout combo for the Rams, with them getting some combo of Tavon Austin/Cordarrelle Patterson/Keenan Allen/DeAndre Hopkins and Kenny Vaccaro/John Cyprien/Matt Elam depending on how things shake out.

But there's the rub: If they love Austin, and they should, there's a good chance the diminutive wideout won't be there when St. Louis is picking at 16. Perhaps they're happy with simply letting the chips fall as they may, but this is a critical draft for St. Louis and they need to hammer both first-round picks to keep up with the Joneses in the division. Austin could be had with a simple hop up that probably wouldn't require giving up their second-round pick (46th) and would still give them plenty of options at either 16 or 22, depending on which spot they moved up from. They were aggressive in moving down to let the Redskins take Robert Griffin III and now they can flip the script and get the man they want with a bold move early.

Cardinals/Bills

Bonus team! Kind of, anyway -- including Buffalo and Arizona as separate teams here felt like cheating since they'd both be moving up for the same reasons, but wouldn't be moving up in the early goings of the first round. Instead, I peg the Bills and Cards as the two most likely teams to make a move back into the first round in order to grab a quarterback. Two signal callers in particular make sense for these teams.

Buffalo obviously has a connection with Ryan Nassib thanks to Doug Marrone coming from Syracuse. If they pass on Geno Smith, as I postulated in my latest mock draft, it's hard not seeing them thinking that they can land the former man of Orange in the second round. Risking Nassib falling back past the Jaguars, Raiders and (potentially aggressive, see above) 49ers (or whoever's holding their pick anyway) might be too much of a risk to bear.

Likewise, I see Mike Glennon as a very nice fit for Bruce Arians' system and he's a former NC State product just like Cards GM Steve Keim (of course, so was recently-cut safety Adrian Wilson ...). But Glennon wouldn't be ideal to step in on day one, which is where Carson Palmer comes in. With some grooming, Glennon's deep-shot ability could be deadly in Arians system. Arizona might be willing to pay the price to ensure they land him.
 

Rabid Ram

Legend
Joined
Mar 13, 2013
Messages
7,360
Name
Dustin
Re: 5 teams that could trade aggressively in the 2013 NFL Dr

I wouldnt mind a trade up but only if its spot for spot and I doubt that happens
 

Ramhusker

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
14,463
Name
Bo Bowen
Re: 5 teams that could trade aggressively in the 2013 NFL Dr

Hell no, we are not allowed to trade UP!!!! I say no!!!! Now don't mention it again!!!
 

DR RAM

Rams Lifer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
12,111
Name
Rambeau
Re: 5 teams that could trade aggressively in the 2013 NFL Dr

Snead sounded like he would be willing to go up or down. I see no need to go up since we signed Jake Long. The only players in this draft that I would go up for is one of the OT's. I would go up one or two spots if I fell in love with a certain player and thought that he was a perfect fit.

More than likely we are looking to trade down for a bonus pick, and I think the #16, and the #22 are both in play.
 

Stranger

How big is infinity?
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
7,182
Name
Hugh
Re: 5 teams that could trade aggressively in the 2013 NFL Dr

DR RAM said:
Snead sounded like he would be willing to go up or down. I see no need to go up since we signed Jake Long. The only players in this draft that I would go up for is one of the OT's. I would go up one or two spots if I fell in love with a certain player and thought that he was a perfect fit.

More than likely we are looking to trade down for a bonus pick, and I think the #16, and the #22 are both in play.
Can we actually trade the #22 pick, as didn't that come from the Redskins?
 

DR RAM

Rams Lifer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
12,111
Name
Rambeau
Re: 5 teams that could trade aggressively in the 2013 NFL Dr

interference said:
DR RAM said:
Snead sounded like he would be willing to go up or down. I see no need to go up since we signed Jake Long. The only players in this draft that I would go up for is one of the OT's. I would go up one or two spots if I fell in love with a certain player and thought that he was a perfect fit.

More than likely we are looking to trade down for a bonus pick, and I think the #16, and the #22 are both in play.
Can we actually trade the #22 pick, as didn't that come from the Redskins?
Yes, I believe so, but we can't trade it for a tendered player.
 

Ramhusker

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
14,463
Name
Bo Bowen
Re: 5 teams that could trade aggressively in the 2013 NFL Dr

interference said:
DR RAM said:
Snead sounded like he would be willing to go up or down. I see no need to go up since we signed Jake Long. The only players in this draft that I would go up for is one of the OT's. I would go up one or two spots if I fell in love with a certain player and thought that he was a perfect fit.

More than likely we are looking to trade down for a bonus pick, and I think the #16, and the #22 are both in play.
Can we actually trade the #22 pick, as didn't that come from the Redskins?

Yes, we can trade the 22. The only restriction on a pick I know of is if you trade your pick for a player that has been tendered, say for a 1st, like Victor Cruz of the Giants, then you have to give them your original pick you earned from your previous year's win/loss record.


And I agree with DR. I think both the 16th and 22nd picks are in play for a trade down. I'd actually love to see someone like GB or JAX want to trade up for the 22nd pick.
 

Ram Quixote

Knight Errant
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
2,923
Name
Tim
Re: 5 teams that could trade aggressively in the 2013 NFL Dr

interference said:
DR RAM said:
Snead sounded like he would be willing to go up or down. I see no need to go up since we signed Jake Long. The only players in this draft that I would go up for is one of the OT's. I would go up one or two spots if I fell in love with a certain player and thought that he was a perfect fit.

More than likely we are looking to trade down for a bonus pick, and I think the #16, and the #22 are both in play.
Can we actually trade the #22 pick, as didn't that come from the Redskins?
Hell yeah. We traded the #6 pick we got from the Redskins last year.
 

A55VA6

Legend
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
8,208
Re: 5 teams that could trade aggressively in the 2013 NFL Dr

In this particular draft, it would be a bad idea to trade up for us. So much talent to choose from, especially 16. 22 could be our trade down target, unless someone like Eddie Lacy is there. Fisher might not be able to resist. I'm okay with more 2nd rounders. I think that's where drafts are won and starters are made.
 

iced

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
6,620
Re: 5 teams that could trade aggressively in the 2013 NFL Dr

We could use the #22 Pick to trade with a team that has a tendered player - you just can't use that pick to sign a tender sheet. Let's say if we hypothetically wanted Cruz - we couldn't sign him to a tender sheet and offer the #22 pick. But there's nothing that says we can't work out a deal with the Giant's FO that sends the #22 pick for Cruz
 

Memento

Your (Somewhat) Friendly Neighborhood Authoress.
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
18,361
Name
Jemma
Re: 5 teams that could trade aggressively in the 2013 NFL Dr

Only player I'd trade up for is Lotulelei, and that's only if he fell out of the top ten (highly unlikely at this point, if not a flat-out dream). If, by some miracle, he fell out of the top ten, I would almost expect the Rams to trade up to get him. No offense meant to Langford, but Lotulelei is going to be a special player in the mold of Haloti Ngata. Absolutely the best player talent-wise in the draft, in my honest opinion.
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #12
Re: 5 teams that could trade aggressively in the 2013 NFL Dr

Memento said:
Only player I'd trade up for is Lotulelei, and that's only if he fell out of the top ten (highly unlikely at this point, if not a flat-out dream). If, by some miracle, he fell out of the top ten, I would almost expect the Rams to trade up to get him. No offense meant to Langford, but Lotulelei is going to be a special player in the mold of Haloti Ngata. Absolutely the best player talent-wise in the draft, in my honest opinion.
Yeah, he's pretty freaking impressive. I could see Fisher getting his bromance on with that dude.
 

Thordaddy

Binding you with ancient logic
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
10,462
Name
Rich
Re: 5 teams that could trade aggressively in the 2013 NFL Dr

Been sayin' this for a while we could trade both ways.up from 16,down from 22 to recover a top 50 pick we had to give up for the move up from 16.
Like this, we trade Buffalo both our firsts for their 1st and 2nd.
It would guarantee Austin and one of the better safeties.
AND do it NOW.
Or how about this
Our two first and our 4th for ther 1,2,4 we'd probably guarantee, Austin ,Moe and a top rated safety
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,225
Name
Burger man
Re: 5 teams that could trade aggressively in the 2013 NFL Dr

Early in the draft....

I give us a 1% chance of trading up.

75% chance of trading down.

I just don't see us sacrificing quality picks (in the first 3 rounds) to move up. It just doesn't feel like a Snead/Fisher roster building technique.