20 short

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
The Rams finished tied for first (Denver) in the league with 52 sacks, and the record was set by the 1984 Chicago Bears with 72. Pretty substantial improvement over last year with a +13 uptick. The Rams finished second in the league in sacks when blitzing (with 26) and second in success rate as they got home for sacks on 12.38 percent of their 184 called blitzes.

20 is a long way off the mark (1.25 sacks per game short), BUT ... they didn't have Brockers the whole season, AND he was a rookie. Further compounded by the fact that Langford, Dunbar and Haggans/McIntosh were all new to the system, and the Rams very rarely played with a lead, which would normally allow for a defense to pin its ears back and get after the passer. Denver, on the other hand....

2013 is the year, SON.
73 sacks or more. Bank it.
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #4
Username said:
Some more offense would help get us there for sure
[mp3]http://vedio.koolearn.com/upload/fckeditor_upload/Flash/2009/10/22/18/1241650910.mp3[/mp3]
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,231
Name
Burger man
Username said:
Some more offense would help get us there for sure

Bingo!

With a lead, teams are forced into more passing situations.