Will you be shocked if the Rams don't pick Clowney,Robinson,Watkins or Matthews with their top pick?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

BigRamFan

Super Bowl XXXVI was rigged!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
2,896
Name
Craig
I guess Mack is also an option but I cannot imagine a scenario, if we remain in the top 8 picks, where one of those four is not selected.
 

paceram

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
1,732
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #3
I guess Mack is also an option but I cannot imagine a scenario, if we remain in the top 8 picks, where one of those four is not selected.

I forgot all about Mack and he definitely could be a sleeper pick by the Rams.
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
The scenario you describe is not going to happen, imo. I will be more shocked if we don't trade away the #2 pick.
 

max

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
3,010
Name
max
I'll be unpleasantly shocked.

They need help on the OL. I believe Jake Long is breaking down, and if they don't resign Saffold the OL is gonna be tough to watch.
 

ausmurp

Starter
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
569
I've often thought that because this is essentially an extra pick, the team may do something crazy, so I'm prepared for any scenario. It wouldn't even shock me if we draft a QB with this pick. Think about it, extra pick, Bradford has missed basically an entire season in 4 years as a pro, and we have a chance to get a top tier QB who can learn for a couple years and then come in and be great (Aaron Rodgers) or be traded. Almost makes too much sense. I know this sounds crazy, but I would probably be most happy if we draft Bortles over all other players. crazy...
 

paceram

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
1,732
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #7
The scenario you describe is not going to happen, imo. I will be more shocked if we don't trade away the #2 pick.

I do think the Rams will end up trading their #2 pick but I will still be surprised if they if they don't end up with Clowney, Robinson, Watkins or Matthews.
 

rhinobean

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Messages
2,152
Name
Bob
I'd be shocked if the Rams don't take one of the 4! Even more shocked if they take a qb in the first!
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
Yeah Pace, I'd bet my house that they will end up with one of those players if they don't trade away that pick.
 

A55VA6

Legend
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
8,208
I honestly will be shocked and stunned. Right now it really feels like either Clowney, Robinson, or Watkins. Who else could really be our 1st choice?
 

Yamahopper

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
3,838
I think they're kinda stuck with that 4. Never Know, Sneed might have a higher grade on another player and the sack to pick him
 

RamsOfCastamere

I drink things, and know nothing
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
7,805
Honestly, you cannot be shocked about Watkins. He's in play as much as the others
 

mr.stlouis

Legend
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
6,454
Name
Main Hook
I've often thought that because this is essentially an extra pick, the team may do something crazy, so I'm prepared for any scenario. It wouldn't even shock me if we draft a QB with this pick. Think about it, extra pick, Bradford has missed basically an entire season in 4 years as a pro, and we have a chance to get a top tier QB who can learn for a couple years and then come in and be great (Aaron Rodgers) or be traded. Almost makes too much sense. I know this sounds crazy, but I would probably be most happy if we draft Bortles over all other players. crazy...

What would we do if Sam lights it up behind his new, power house, OL? That's a wasted pick. Then you miss out on a PM or stud like the ones mentioned.

I think we're dead in the water without a dominant OL.