Tipsheet: Quit blaming Bradford for Rams draft failures

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

GreeneCounty

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
1,121
http://www.stltoday.com/sports/colu...cle_ee569df9-5fa3-57f5-8f68-96b4f1f296b1.html


Quarterback Sam Bradford has taken plenty of blame over the years as the Rams stacked up losing seasons on his watch. Some of it was more deserved than others.

But the most ridiculous complaint about Bradford is that he has failed despite the tremendous offensive weapons surrounding him.

Tipsheet is a big fan of Bill Barnwell, who analyzes the NFL for ESPN's Grantland vehicle. But Tipsheet begs to differ with Barnwell on this point:

It’s harder to make the case that the Rams haven’t done enough to surround Bradford with talent. Since drafting Bradford with the first pick of the 2010 draft, the Rams have invested heavily in weapons for him at wide receiver. In fact, using the Chase Stuart Draft Value Chart, the Rams have spent more draft capital on wide receivers than anybody else in football. St. Louis has spent a first-rounder (Tavon Austin), a second-rounder (Brian Quick, using the first pick of the second round), two third-rounders (Austin Pettis, Stedman Bailey), and three fourth-rounders (Greg Salas, Mardy Gilyard, Chris Givens) on wideouts over the past four years. And that doesn’t even include the fifth-round pick they traded for Brandon Lloyd in 2011 or their heavy investments at tight end, where they spent a second-round pick on Lance Kendricks before giving downfield target Jared Cook a massive deal in free agency. Bradford’s best receiver, after all of that, was undrafted free agent Danny Amendola. Not a single one of those receivers — who fit all kinds of makes and models — have lived up to their draft expectations. St. Louis is instead giving serious consideration to the idea of starting Titans castoff Kenny Britt at wideout this season. If three coaches and nearly a dozen receivers aren’t making things better in St. Louis, at what point is it the quarterback’s fault?

Here's when: When one of these receivers or tight ends who failed with Bradford breaks out for another team.

Experts find it hard to believe that the Rams could have made that many personnel and coaching mistakes. Tipsheet finds it very easy to believe after watching this team play.

Salas got his shot elsewhere and did nothing. Gilyard got his shot elsewhere and did nothing.

If Bradford was their problem, then surely they would have excelled once somebody else started throwing them passes.

As for all these other would-be Pro Bowlers, let's survey the field:

• Givens made some big plays as a rookie, then struggled with an ankle injury much of last season. He tried to step up his offseason conditioning this summer, but he has fallen down on the depth chart.

• Austin dropped a bunch of passes when Bradford was healthy last season and seldom got separation on downfield routes. (Experts liked to blame this on the play-calling offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer.) Then scatter-armed Kellen Clemens replaced Bradford. Then Austin got hurt.

• Cook dropped a bunch of passes when Bradford was healthy. He could become a huge downfield threat this season if he learns to run his routes with conviction and IF HE CATCHES THE BALL.


• Kendricks drooped a bunch of passes as a rookie. He also suffered a broken finger last season and fell behind Cook in the passing game. He could be a decent threat this season on mid-range passes IF HE CATCHES THE BALL.

• Quick was a massive draft bust in his first two seasons. Shaun Hill targeted him on one deep route in the preseason opener and Quick couldn't get clear. But he is having a decent camp, so perhaps he is finally ready to emerge.

• Bailey emerged as a very nice route-runner late last season. He has dazzled in training camp. But he will open the season by serving a four-game PED suspension.

• Pettis had a terrible first camp and later earned a four-game PED suspension. Since then he has evolved into a decent possession receiver.

And, yes, Britt is easily the best Rams receiver in training camp. Is this Bradford's fault?

Or could it be, maybe, just maybe, some of the other receivers REEK OF MEDIOCRITY?

Just because these guys were high draft picks and/or got some big money doesn't mean they are good football players. Maybe, just maybe, the Rams have done a terrible job drafting and coaching young receivers.

(BTW, Bradford helped receivers who were just spare guys elsewhere — Amendola and Brandon Gibson — put up numbers in St. Louis and get big money elsewhere as free agents.)

For the record, Tipsheet believes Bradford will have a solid season. The Rams will run the ball for nice chunks behind a sturdy offensive line and put him in lots of favorable down-and-distance scenarios. He should do some damage with play-action passes.

Britt and (eventually) Bailey will upgrade the receiving corps and both Austin and Cook should make more big plays IF Bradford can stay healthy.

Will Bradford justify his mind-boggling rookie contract? No. But maybe he will quit taking the fall for the various failed personnel men, head coaches, offensive coordinators and young receivers who have stumbled in and out of Rams Park.
http://www.stltoday.com/sports/colu...cle_ee569df9-5fa3-57f5-8f68-96b4f1f296b1.html
 

Alan

Legend
Joined
Oct 22, 2013
Messages
9,766
"Maybe, just maybe, the Rams have done a terrible job drafting and coaching young receivers."
Half true and half premature.
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
Here's when: When one of these receivers or tight ends who failed with Bradford breaks out for another team.

Took him [Gordon] long enough to read this board.
 

rhinobean

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 19, 2013
Messages
2,152
Name
Bob
Pretty much have to agree with that assessment! Maybe, this is the year the wideouts get it together for our Rams!
 

Philly5

Rookie
Joined
Jul 18, 2013
Messages
415
The Rams tenure of Fisher, Snead, and probably Bradford is dependent on a couple of the existing Receivers stepping up. Britt coming in here and immediately jumping to the head of the class does not say much about the current crew. Getting late in the game.
 

junkman

Farewell to all!
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
822
Name
junkman
Real Rams fans can see the positive evolution of both Bradford and the receiving weapons.

With Bradford, imho, it has come to the point where he is where we want him to be as a passer and just needs to stay healthy.

The WRs and TEs, none have made the rookie splashes, but they are likewise evolving, with:

WRs: Britt emerging as a leader, Britt rubbing off on Quick, Bailey's star continues to rise, Tavon getting more chances to be Tavon, Pettis as a solid possession guy. Only Givens seems to be fading, but he did look good as a KO returner.

TEs, I agree with tipsheet but will add that Bayer showed some promise from the bottom of the depth chart.
 

Alan

Legend
Joined
Oct 22, 2013
Messages
9,766
Philly5 assessing the WR situation:
Britt coming in here and immediately jumping to the head of the class does not say much about the current crew.
Let's not forget that Britt has shown he's a very good WR when not injured/recovering from injury. Add in the non-football things to his injuries and that's why we were lucky (?) enough to get him. He looks to be fully recovered and is again flashing the skills that made him a 1st round pick in the draft. Lets also not forget the quality, or lack thereof, of the QBs he's played with until now. I think you're overstating what it says about the state of our WR corps.
 

Angry Ram

Captain RAmerica Original Rammer
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Messages
17,905
Seems like WRs are destined to fail in St. Louis after Torry and Ike. Let the young'ns develop first before banging the bust hammer.

Even positive PD articles are backhanded.
 

cracengl

Rookie
Joined
May 18, 2014
Messages
360
Why didn't Barnwell throw Mark Clayton in there? Perhaps because it didn't fit his premise? A guy who had under performed his entire career in Baltimore after being a 1st round pick. He comes here, learns the playbook exceedingly fast and him and Sam develop an excellent chemistry. Clayton has big games with Sam throwing to him, but gets hurt and put on the injured reserve for the rest of the year.

Amendola played like 5 games a year. Brandon Lloyd was brought in mid-season and didn't do all that badly. But for the most part, every guy he chooses to talk about either just sucked/still sucks/has yet to develop or can't stay healthy. From my perspective, that is the real problem with Bradford--he gets hurt a fair amount. It's not that he doesn't have talent.

I'll defer back to Gordon's analysis in the article for the rest of the guys, but you can't just take where a guy was drafted and use that to justify the premise that a QB has been surrounded with talent. He's been surrounded with guys who have "perceived talent."

Oh, and if you told me that Cleveland has drafted that poorly all of those years, I'd believe you. So why is so hard to believe it happened in St. Louis? This organization was a cluster for a decade!