The true cost of the Sammy Watkins trade for Buffalo

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,079
Name
Burger man
http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/12127113/buffalo-bills-gave-too-much-sammy-watkins-nfl


nfl_g_samwat_cr_576x324.jpg
Thearon W. Henderson/Getty ImagesThe Buffalo Bills traded up from No. 9 to No. 4 in 2014 to draft talented wide receiver Sammy Watkins.


When news came from colleague Adam Schefter that former Buffalo Bills head coach Doug Marrone did not approve of the team's decision to trade up in the 2014 NFL draft to select Clemson wide receiver Sammy Watkins, giving away their 2015 first-round pick in the process, it provided a natural opportunity to assess the merits of the trade.

In many cases -- regardless of whether the transaction is a trade, free-agent signing or draft selection -- there's a tendency to forge a knee-jerk reaction that can prove to be inaccurate in the long term. But while Watkins' career is far from over, based on a multitude of factors involved, it's hard to disagree with the sentiment suggested by Marrone: The decision to trade up for him was not the right move.

Let's look at the price Buffalo will have to pay for its decision to move up to draft Watkins.


The opportunity cost

The Bills originally held the ninth pick in the 2014 draft, moving that pick plus first- and fourth-round picks in 2015 to Cleveland to select Watkins, whom team president Russ Brandon categorized as a "generational talent." As it turns out, that 2015 first-round pick will be the 19th pick in the draft and is now owned by the Browns (the exact slot of the fourth-round pick will be determined based on how many third-round compensatory picks are awarded this offseason).

While trading picks is an imperfect exercise, longtime NFL coach Jimmy Johnson helped bring to light a draft pick value chart that assigns a point value to each pick in descending order. The fourth pick in a draft carries 1,800 points of value, while the ninth pick carries 1,350. Using that value chart as a scale, the Bills acquired a point value of 1,800 -- Watkins at pick No. 4 in 2014 -- in exchange for what turned out to be approximately 2,290 points -- the No. 9 pick in 2014 (1,350), the No. 19 pick in 2015 (875) and a 2015 fourth-round selection (approximately 65 points), a nearly 500-point discrepancy.

Again, these draft-day trades involve an element of projection, but even if the Bills had won the Super Bowl this season, the draft trade would have incurred a loss of close to 200 points in draft pick value.

Watkins versus the rest of the rookie receivers

Based on the fact that the Browns did not draft a receiver at any point in 2014, it seems unlikely they would have taken Watkins had they stayed pat at No. 4. But it still seems like a safe bet that Watkins would have been gone by pick nine, and perhaps Mike Evans -- the No. 7 pick in the draft -- would have been taken, too. Even if that were the case, the Bills still could have selected from some of the other highly touted wide receivers, including, of course, Odell Beckham Jr. The likely NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year, whom the Giants selected at No. 12, finished with more catches, yards and touchdowns than Watkins in four fewer games.

Part of that, of course, is tied to the fact that Watkins played for an offense with a tenuous quarterback situation, at best. So I asked an NFL personnel man to size up Watkins relative to the other rookie wide receivers with a year of film to evaluate them from. "He was good, he just needs a QB and needs to stay healthy," he said. "I still think he's the most explosive big-play receiver out of the group. Beckham separated himself with his ball skills and overall route-running ability. I still would never draft a WR that early unless he has rare physical traits ([Julio] Jones, [A.J.] Green, [Calvin] Johnson)."

Specific to 2014, another reason not to draft a wide receiver as early as No. 4 is the overall depth of the class. Below is a snapshot of 10 wide receivers -- Watkins included -- who made an impact in 2014.



PlayerTeamWhen draftedReceiving yards
Odell Beckham Jr.New York Giants12th1,305
Mike EvansTampa Bay Buccaneers7th1,051
Kelvin BenjaminCarolina Panthers28th1,008
Sammy WatkinsBuffalo Bills4th982
Jordan MatthewsPhiladelphia Eagles42nd872
Jarvis LandryMiami Dolphins63rd758
John BrownArizona Cardinals91st696
Allen HurnsJacksonville JaguarsUndrafted677
Taylor GabrielCleveland BrownsUndrafted621
Brandin CooksNew Orleans Saints20th550 (in 10 GP)


To reiterate: The production of receivers is tied to, at least in part, quarterback play and the draft is also a projection -- we don't know how these players will pan out before they hit the field. And while Watkins could turn out to the best of the bunch in this class of receivers, it was a position robust with talent that other teams acquired from the first round and beyond.

The diminished resources

One way to interpret the Bills' decision to move up for Watkins was that they viewed the roster as one piece -- a dynamic wide receiver -- away from playoff and/or division-winning contention. As was evidenced in 2014, Buffalo's biggest roster hole is at quarterback, and the void is much larger than the receiver gap it had before last year's draft. The team drafted EJ Manuel in the first round in 2013, but he was benched after just four games this season in favor of Kyle Orton, lured out of retirement weeks before being named the starter. Orton retired following the 2014 season, and while Manuel doesn't turn 25 until March, it's hard to envision that the team truly views him as a viable starting option.

Which brings us to the other downside of the trade: the lost picks, most specifically this year's first-rounder. While it seems unlikely that Buffalo would've been able to land one of the two most sought after draft-eligible quarterback prospects -- Florida State's Jameis Winston and Oregon's Marcus Mariota -- at No. 19, it still is stripped of a critical resource in talent acquisition. The free-agency options are limited this offseason, and without a first-round pick, the Bills are going to have to get creative to find a starting quarterback for 2015.
 

FRO

Legend
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
5,308
Good article. Hindsight being 20/20 they sit and pick Beckham. Watkins had a great rookie year and with better QB play he will be a great WR in the league. It was dumb move to give up a future first.
 

Athos

Legend
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
5,933
Loved Watkins, but wasn't worth a trade up.

Should have stood pat for Beckham.
 

iced

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
6,620
And if they had stayed with Beckham and NYG took Watkins, they'd be writing an article how they should have taken someone else.

Beckham does not have those numbers __anywhere near it__ if you switched from Eli to Manuel in buffalo's run dominant offense
 

FRO

Legend
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
5,308
I think Watkins and Evans both lived up to their hype. Beckham and Benjamin exceeded their expectations. It's not like Watkins is a bust, the Bills just overpaid for him. That was my feeling at the time and still is. But atleast they have a quality young player to show for it.
 

Memphis Ram

Legend
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
6,668
Making such a trade in such a deep WR draft class?
Said it before and will say it again.
Dumb. Stupid. Dumb.

I don't seem to remember a lot of pre-draft buzz around Beckham. I could be wrong though.

I recall reading somewhere pre-draft that the Rams didn't have much separation between Watkins and Beckham. Of course, many offered poo poo towards such a thought when it was expressed. Especially, the Watkins or bust crowd.
 

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les

If I recall from an article I read about that system next years picks are worth "one round less". In other words a first rounder next year is worth a second round in value/points this year.

Right now the Bills have WAY bigger issues than that trade. They have no QB and Rex Ryan is coming to town.
 

jjab360

Legend
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
6,636
Had a strong feeling that while Watkins was pretty good, that class was so strong and so deep that it was almost certain that he wouldn't be the best WR that year. It's pretty early on, but so far my gut was probably right.
 

BonifayRam

Legend
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
13,435
Name
Vernon
The Bills did the opposite the draft before. Bills had a chance at a top WR in 2013 with the #8 first pick & traded down. The Tavon Austin trade. Then the Bills who must have not liked TA went for Sammy in 2014 instead.
 

Akrasian

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
4,918

I think the rule of thumb works for later round picks, but less so as you say for high picks. If a team wants to trade a future pick for a fifth this year, it needs to be next year's fourth, for instance. But teams value firsts and seconds much more, and as you say the effective value is somewhat higher than the "value goes down one round" rule.
 

Memphis Ram

Legend
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
6,668
And if they had stayed with Beckham and NYG took Watkins, they'd be writing an article how they should have taken someone else.

Beckham does not have those numbers __anywhere near it__ if you switched from Eli to Manuel in buffalo's run dominant offense

Buffalo 402 rushing attempts vs. 579 passing attempts. And they averaged 3.7 yards per carry.
 

iced

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
6,620
Buffalo 402 rushing attempts vs. 579 passing attempts. And they averaged 3.7 yards per carry.

guess they ran less than i thought...

still, orton/manuel isn't anything close to Manning or their offense