The best QB stat of the day

[bwdenverram]

Tom Brady:

18/38 197 yards NO TD's 1 INT
5.2 AVG and a rating of 52.2

Pretty boy got shut down today by Cincy. I like it.

 

[Mojo Ram]

 

[max]

Week 5 performances....

Sam Bradford STL 105.3
Andrew Luck IND 104.0
Cam Newton CAR 96.8
Matthew Stafford DET 89.8
Ryan Tannehill MIA 86.1
Andy Dalton CIN 81.1
Russell Wilson SEA 78.7
Joe Flacco BAL 73.6
Michael Vick PHI 69.0
Alex Smith KAN 60.3
Eli Manning NYG 56.1
Tom Brady NWE 52.2

 

[DR RAM]

Week 5 performances....

Sam Bradford STL 105.3
Andrew Luck IND 104.0
Cam Newton CAR 96.8
Matthew Stafford DET 89.8
Ryan Tannehill MIA 86.1
Andy Dalton CIN 81.1
Russell Wilson SEA 78.7
Joe Flacco BAL 73.6
Michael Vick PHI 69.0
Alex Smith KAN 60.3
Eli Manning NYG 56.1
Tom Brady NWE 52.2

And the most important thing is the W.

 

[bwdenverram]

Week 5 performances....

Sam Bradford STL 105.3
Andrew Luck IND 104.0
Cam Newton CAR 96.8
Matthew Stafford DET 89.8
Ryan Tannehill MIA 86.1
Andy Dalton CIN 81.1
Russell Wilson SEA 78.7
Joe Flacco BAL 73.6
Michael Vick PHI 69.0
Alex Smith KAN 60.3
Eli Manning NYG 56.1
Tom Brady NWE 52.2

And the most important thing is the W.

+1

 

[CGI_Ram]

Week 5 performances....

Sam Bradford STL 105.3
Andrew Luck IND 104.0
Cam Newton CAR 96.8
Matthew Stafford DET 89.8
Ryan Tannehill MIA 86.1
Andy Dalton CIN 81.1
Russell Wilson SEA 78.7
Joe Flacco BAL 73.6
Michael Vick PHI 69.0
Alex Smith KAN 60.3
Eli Manning NYG 56.1
Tom Brady NWE 52.2

And the most important thing is the W.

+1

+2.

Now we just need to remind ourselves that QB's have up and down weeks... and not over-react after Sam's next bad game.

Sam's my man.

 

[kurtfaulk]

Tom Brady:

0 TD's

that was the best stat.

the golden boy fell short of the consecutive games with a td record. you better believe he and the hobo will be cut about that.

.

 

[Rabid Ram]

Week 5 performances....

Sam Bradford STL 105.3
Andrew Luck IND 104.0
Cam Newton CAR 96.8
Matthew Stafford DET 89.8
Ryan Tannehill MIA 86.1
Andy Dalton CIN 81.1
Russell Wilson SEA 78.7
Joe Flacco BAL 73.6
Michael Vick PHI 69.0
Alex Smith KAN 60.3
Eli Manning NYG 56.1
Tom Brady NWE 52.2

And the most important thing is the W.

+1

+2.

Now we just need to remind ourselves that QB's have up and down weeks... and not over-react after Sam's next bad game.

Sam's my man.

Should have read the game day thread people still harping on sam

 

[CGI_Ram]

Week 5 performances....

Sam Bradford STL 105.3
Andrew Luck IND 104.0
Cam Newton CAR 96.8
Matthew Stafford DET 89.8
Ryan Tannehill MIA 86.1
Andy Dalton CIN 81.1
Russell Wilson SEA 78.7
Joe Flacco BAL 73.6
Michael Vick PHI 69.0
Alex Smith KAN 60.3
Eli Manning NYG 56.1
Tom Brady NWE 52.2

And the most important thing is the W.

+1

+2.

Now we just need to remind ourselves that QB's have up and down weeks... and not over-react after Sam's next bad game.

Sam's my man.

Should have read the game day thread people still harping on sam

Of course! He wasn't perfect. :lmao:

I was in that thread. I stayed focused on the big picture... we were winning.

 

[EastRam]

Sam had a good day.

And he still has a long way to go.

 

[jrry32]

+2.

Now we just need to remind ourselves that QB's have up and down weeks... and not over-react after Sam's next bad game.

Sam's my man.

Not trying to be a wet blanket here but I didn't really feel that excited by Sam's performance. That Pettis throw was gorgeous. Truly gorgeous and he definitely tried to go down the field more when he realized he was going to get some protection but there were still some things I noticed that were issues to me.

That all said, I feel pretty confident that his lack of aggressiveness is a protection of the poor production. When they protect him, he gains confidence and takes more shots.

 

[CGI_Ram]

+2.

Now we just need to remind ourselves that QB's have up and down weeks... and not over-react after Sam's next bad game.

Sam's my man.

Not trying to be a wet blanket here but I didn't really feel that excited by Sam's performance. That Pettis throw was gorgeous. Truly gorgeous and he definitely tried to go down the field more when he realized he was going to get some protection but there were still some things I noticed that were issues to me.

That all said, I feel pretty confident that his lack of aggressiveness is a protection of the poor production. When they protect him, he gains confidence and takes more shots.

I saw issues too. I see them every week.

I see them with every QB. Manning is making bad passes in this monster game against Dallas.

But... Sam's our man. Bridgewater is no Andrew Luck.

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2

 

[CGI_Ram]

And... Romo just threw a BAD INT despite an otherwise amazing performance.

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2

 

[jrry32]

+2.

Now we just need to remind ourselves that QB's have up and down weeks... and not over-react after Sam's next bad game.

Sam's my man.

Not trying to be a wet blanket here but I didn't really feel that excited by Sam's performance. That Pettis throw was gorgeous. Truly gorgeous and he definitely tried to go down the field more when he realized he was going to get some protection but there were still some things I noticed that were issues to me.

That all said, I feel pretty confident that his lack of aggressiveness is a protection of the poor production. When they protect him, he gains confidence and takes more shots.

I saw issues too. I see them every week.

I see them with every QB. Manning is making bad passes in this monster game against Dallas.

But... Sam's our man. Bridgewater is no Andrew Luck.

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2

He's better.

 

[DR RAM]

+2.

Now we just need to remind ourselves that QB's have up and down weeks... and not over-react after Sam's next bad game.

Sam's my man.

Not trying to be a wet blanket here but I didn't really feel that excited by Sam's performance. That Pettis throw was gorgeous. Truly gorgeous and he definitely tried to go down the field more when he realized he was going to get some protection but there were still some things I noticed that were issues to me.

That all said, I feel pretty confident that his lack of aggressiveness is a protection of the poor production. When they protect him, he gains confidence and takes more shots.

I saw issues too. I see them every week.

I see them with every QB. Manning is making bad passes in this monster game against Dallas.

But... Sam's our man. Bridgewater is no Andrew Luck.

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2

He's better.

Not in my opinion. Not even close.

 

[jrry32]

And... Romo just threw a BAD INT despite an otherwise amazing performance.

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2

I can live with Ints. There are other things that worry me more. But I'm not going to push this after a win and a solid performance.

 

[jrry32]

+2.

Now we just need to remind ourselves that QB's have up and down weeks... and not over-react after Sam's next bad game.

Sam's my man.

Not trying to be a wet blanket here but I didn't really feel that excited by Sam's performance. That Pettis throw was gorgeous. Truly gorgeous and he definitely tried to go down the field more when he realized he was going to get some protection but there were still some things I noticed that were issues to me.

That all said, I feel pretty confident that his lack of aggressiveness is a protection of the poor production. When they protect him, he gains confidence and takes more shots.

I saw issues too. I see them every week.

I see them with every QB. Manning is making bad passes in this monster game against Dallas.

But... Sam's our man. Bridgewater is no Andrew Luck.

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2

He's better.

Not in my opinion. Not even close.

He's better. High IQ player in a pro style offense. Makes reads at the LOS, calls audibles, goes through progressions and has an amazing play-action fake. Bridgewater also has nimble and light feet which make his drops quick and effortless. He has a live arm(stronger arm than Luck) and shows the ability to consistently make "wow" throws. Good mobility. Quick movements in the pocket with a good feeling for pressure. Quick, compact, effortless release. Holds the ball high and release is over the top.

I am going to continue to evaluate him as the year goes on and he faces tougher competition but based on what I've seen thus far, he's the best QB prospect that I've personally evaluated. Going to be an unbelievable pro.

 

[DR RAM]

+2.

Now we just need to remind ourselves that QB's have up and down weeks... and not over-react after Sam's next bad game.

Sam's my man.

Not trying to be a wet blanket here but I didn't really feel that excited by Sam's performance. That Pettis throw was gorgeous. Truly gorgeous and he definitely tried to go down the field more when he realized he was going to get some protection but there were still some things I noticed that were issues to me.

That all said, I feel pretty confident that his lack of aggressiveness is a protection of the poor production. When they protect him, he gains confidence and takes more shots.

I saw issues too. I see them every week.

I see them with every QB. Manning is making bad passes in this monster game against Dallas.

But... Sam's our man. Bridgewater is no Andrew Luck.

Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2

He's better.

Not in my opinion. Not even close.

He's better. High IQ player in a pro style offense. Makes reads at the LOS, calls audibles, goes through progressions and has an amazing play-action fake. Bridgewater also has nimble and light feet which make his drops quick and effortless. He has a live arm(stronger arm than Luck) and shows the ability to consistently make "wow" throws. Good mobility. Quick movements in the pocket with a good feeling for pressure. Quick, compact effortless release. Holds the ball high and release is over the top.

I am going to continue to evaluate him as the year goes on and he faces tougher competition but based on what I've seen thus far, he's the best QB prospect that I've personally evaluated. Going to be an unbelievable pro.

You go ahead. I disagree. He's not on the same level is so many ways.

 

[jrry32]

You go ahead. I disagree. He's not on the same level is so many ways.

Ok. Agree to disagree. Because from my vantage point, that kid is unbelievable.

 

[DR RAM]

You go ahead. I disagree. He's not on the same level is so many ways.

Ok. Agree to disagree. Because from my vantage point, that kid is unbelievable.

So, we will re-visit this in a year, because Luck made an immediate impression.