So what do you think, are NFL players underpaid? Odell Beckham Jr. seems to think so

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Should NFL players get paid more than athletes in other sports because the game is more dangerous?

  • Yes

    Votes: 6 12.5%
  • No

    Votes: 39 81.3%
  • Not sure

    Votes: 3 6.3%

  • Total voters
    48

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/05/18/odell-beckham-nfl-players-should-get-paid-more/

Odell Beckham: NFL players should get paid more
Posted by Michael David Smith on May 18, 2015

cd0ymzcznguwzdbhnduynddiytjhm2yyzthlmtjjotqwyyznpwflzmi3ogyzytnjm2jinjjkowiyywrmmdm3nta2zta4.jpeg
Getty Images

Giants receiver Odell Beckham thinks the $10.4 million he’s guaranteed over the first four years of his rookie contract is not enough.

“I think that we should make more money, personally,” Beckham told The Huffington Post when asked what he’d change about the NFL.

Beckham says NFL players should get paid more than baseball or basketball players because football is a more dangerous game.

“I understand that basketball plays 80-something games, baseball plays this many games, soccer plays that many games, but this is a sport where there’s more injuries. There’s more collisions. It’s not even a full-contact sport, I would call it a full-collision sport. You have people running who can run 20 miles per hour and they’re running downhill to hit you, and you’re running 18 miles per hour. That’s a car wreck. It’s just the career is shorter. There’s injuries that you have after you leave the game, brain injuries, whatever it is, nerve injuries.”

The truth, however, is that the danger inherent to a profession has little to do with the pay within that profession. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, logging is America’s most dangerous profession. If people were paid according to the risks associated with their jobs, lumberjacks would make more than NFL players. But that’s not how it works.

In reality, NFL players make less money than baseball and basketball players primarily because baseball and basketball have smaller rosters. The players’ percentage of the league’s revenue is similar in all three sports, but in the NFL that money is divided among a much larger pool of players — more than twice as many players as in Major League Baseball and more than four times as many players as in the National Basketball Association.

As a result, it’s unlikely that NFL players will ever make as much, on average, as MLB or NBA players. No matter how much Beckham thinks they should.
------------
Odell,

Nobody is forcing you to play. If you don’t feel that the amount of money offered by your employer is adequate, you have every right to say no and walk away and work elsewhere. If you feel that the risks are not appropriately accounted for in your compensation package, you also have every right to walk away from the game. Once again, nobody is forcing you to play. But you did sign that contract.

If you feel that the percentage of revenue shared with the players is not adequate, you have a players’ union that negotiates the CBA on a periodic basis, so you can let your voice be heard there.

Thank you,

A fan who is much less entitled than you.
----------
The Madden curse has already infected his brain.
----------
That’s one way to look at it.
How about the college players?? I’m sure all 127 D-1 football programs and the NCAA as a whole generate of a lot more money than the NFL.
Those kids are being robbed. One year in the league and you are on the madden cover kid. Which they probably paid you handsomely for.
Shut up.
---------
Careful what you wish for………more regular season games.
----------
He’s right……

Look at MLB, NBA & NHL contracts.
Sports that are no where near the popularity of the NFL.
They get guaranteed contracts, and the salaries look even higher.

Then factor in the danger of each sport and player career longevity.

Then factor in revenues created by TV contracts.

NFL Players have been getting hosed for years. Makes me wonder if DeMaurice Smith doesn’t have some kind of under the table arrangement with the owners. I mean outside looking in it’s either that or the guy is the worst negotiating lawyer of all time.
-----------
No, actually soldiers, EMT’s, firemen, police officers, nurses and teachers should get paid more. These people risk their lives and try to help others. All athletes do is play a game and get paid more in a year than most people will see in a lifetime.
----------
I guess in comparison to MLB and NBA players he has a point. But when you look at the fact he’s saying an athlete deserves more money to play a game…. well thats just silly.
---------
Ticket prices for all professional sports have greatly outpaced the ability of average fans to afford them. Clearly players in all three of these sports are overpaid.
---------
Relax. He was giving an honest answer when asked “what” he would change about the NFL. Wondering what answer all of you would give if you were asked the same question by your boss and you were not too intimidated to answer the question honestly. I bet I can figure that out real quick…
---------
I don’t begrudge athletes what they earn. They put in a lot of hard work, and basically the market decides the pool of money that is available to pay player salaries. Plus, if any of us had the athletic ability we wouldn’t walk away from the money.

The NFL is worth billions, so of course the players deserve some of that.

While I see Beckam’s point, voicing this kind of thing makes him look like an entitled, out of touch idiot.
--------
1. Comparing a professional athlete to an average worker is an apples and oranges comparison. Totally different rules, totally different labor market.

2. Even if you tried to make that comparison your logic doesn’t hold. The difference in pay between industries is typically determined by supply, demand, and revenue generated. Hence the reason NFL players are paid more than lumberjacks.

However, this formulation does not preclude factoring in health risks. If anything that would probably be one of the considerations that determine the supply part of the equation. If you think health risks and earning potential don’t affect young athletes when they’re deciding which sports to pursue I have a bridge to sell you
-----------
Roger Goodell makes 44 million per year.

And has done a poor job.

Something is wrong
----------
He doesn’t even have a point in comparison to the other leagues ….. yes an NBA player can make more, but since each team has only 12 players 1 players impact can be much greater. Same in baseball… outside of one position, football players are almost all replaceable and thus not as important..

Now i think that rule number one for people who are millionaires should be never to publicly say you should make more money…. No matter what, right or wrong, you never look good. In a country where the median salary is in 40’s of thousands its not a good idea to complain about making 1.8 million a year….
----------
Shut your mouth, keep playing well market yourself, and get on Campbell’s Soup commercials and get that endorsement money. Just ask Richard Sherman, the Mannings and countless others on how to maximize your profits. Stop hanging out with successful NBA players and trying to keep up with their lifestyle take care of yours first bro.
---------
I understand the economics of football salaries relative to the other leagues and accept it for what it is. I also understand Beckham’s statement, and would love to see a better pay system for more of the players (although I am pretty sure he was talking about the elite big money contracts). I actually hated to see the players agree to getting a lower percentage of the profits that happened with the last CBA, but I know the owners were entrenched on that point.

What should change? First off, anyone that makes the 53 man roster should make the same minimum pay, say 1 to 1.5 million. At present, the pay differential between those on rookie contracts and the vet minimum has rendered many 4 to 5 year vets unemployable, as the clubs seek to save money for the big contracts the quarterbacks get. The premium paid to veterans they negotiated with this contract has actually worked against the vet. I believe it has shortened many mid level careers. If everyone on the 53 man roster makes the same (but with a higher base), the best players win jobs, not the cheapest.

Secondly, just as there is a salary cap for the league, there should be a salary cap for the amount you can pay any single player. Say something like no single player can take up more than 12% (random # here) of the cap. This would help limit the damage an elite QB contract does to the team as a whole and would free up money to bring the minimum pay level of all the players up (as suggested in my first point). It has always galled me that the guy who takes the least physical pounding on the field makes the most money.

I know this will never happen, but if the NFLPA is there to represent “all” the players, and not just the elite few, they would strongly consider something like this.
 

ChrisW

Stating the obvious
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Messages
4,670
It's a fickle bitch. But honestly I think they get paid plenty. Most players just don't have the understanding that they need to live off the money for the rest of their lives, though.
 

Zombie Slayer

You are entitled to nothing.
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
935
Name
Dave
Last time I checked, there are dangerous jobs out there, even more so than playing football, and those people are getting paid far far less. So, no, football players should not get paid more.
 

Akrasian

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
4,923
I do think that the percentage of revenues going to pay should be higher for players - either straight pay, or for lifetime benefits (most likely a combination of both). I don't watch the NFL for the owners, but for the players - THEY are the ones who create - actually, literally ARE - the product.

I somehow don't think the games got more enjoyable when the owners clawed back a huge amount of money from the players in the last CBA. I'd rather more of my money went to the people I'm watching, who are undergoing a lot of pain and long term damage for my entertainment.

It used to be that while the owners made good money on their investment, it was less than in other areas they could invest, because owning NFL teams is fun. Now they make huge guaranteed profits, more than they would possibly be guaranteed elsewhere. While players are getting crippled more often, because the game has changed so much from 40 years ago.
 

BuiltRamTough

Pro Bowler
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
1,209
Name
Edmond
These players I swear. You would think 10 mill or more would be enough in a span of 4-5 years for Becham. Gtfo.
 

JackDRams

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
4,524
Name
Jack
If football players played more, yes. But they only play so much. Hockey players go 80+ games and typically make less then most football players. Baseball players are overpaid, but they play almost every day of the week. Yeah football is more dangerous, but you also only play 20 games at most. That's more air time for the other sports, which means more scrilla to go around to pay these athletes.
 

12intheBox

Legend
Joined
Sep 12, 2013
Messages
9,917
Name
Wil Fay
Absolutely he is right.

I look at it like this....

Let's say there were 2 professional football leagues.

League A has the current NFL ownership, the uniforms, logos, training staff, stadiums, commissioner, coaches - all the way down to the ball boys. But it doesn't have any of the current players.

League B has all new teams, they play out of leased college stadiums, all new coaches - but all of the players we know are in league B. The best players in the world play in B and those who don't make it play in A.

Both league A and league B play on Sunday afternoons - which one are you going to watch?
 

JIMERAMS

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Messages
1,017
Name
Bill
maybe someone should show him one of our troops paychecks then see what he says.
 

Mikey Ram

Hall of Fame
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
3,398
Name
Mike
I just can't bring myself to bleed for guys making millions or tens of millions for playing football...As for the danger involved, so what ?? Choose to something with little or no danger involved...They CHOOSE to play football because they make obscene amounts of money...
 

Stranger

How big is infinity?
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
7,182
Name
Hugh
Absolutely, they are underpaid. And there should be a huge retirement & medical fund available for former players. There is $12B of new money in this pot every year. Why should so much go to owners?
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #14
Absolutely, they are underpaid. And there should be a huge retirement & medical fund available for former players. There is $12B of new money in this pot every year. Why should so much go to owners?

Steering much more of the NFL profits into retirement and medical funds for retired players is indeed the way to go.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
21,739
In comparison to the owners, the players are vastly underpaid. In comparison to the average fan, the players are vastly overpaid.

I would be happy to play in the NFL for half of what most players are making. I wish I was good enough. As for the danger, I used to free climb for fun. As for beating up my body, I laid bricks and stone patios most of my adult life. My neck, knees and hips are shot and I am only 48 this year.

I am tired of people complaining about what they make, when they have it so good. If Odell Beckham thinks he can make more elsewhere then he should leave. I bet he will love having to go to a 9-5 job everyday with no job security and a boss telling him what to do all day. He can have a boring lifestyle where he watches athletes as a pastime, wishing he was one of them, instead of being a celebrity and having the cash to travel the world and go to lavish parties and meet some of the most beautiful women in the world.

Just one more reason to hate OBJ.
 

Stranger

How big is infinity?
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
7,182
Name
Hugh
Steering much more of the NFL profits into retirement and medical funds for retired players is indeed the way to go.
I wonder what the size of the total pool of existing retired NFL players is?

There are approximately 1,750 players in the league at any given time. Multiply that by 30yrs of players, and you get a pool of approximately 52,500 retired players. Now, say each player gets a pension of $60K/yr to live on, that's $3.15B/yr. The NFL can afford that.

Perhaps a deal where retired players get 1/3 of the annual revenues, current players get another 1/3, and the owners/league get the final 1/3. Then, we wouldn't have former players going broke and homeless.
 

Memento

Your (Somewhat) Friendly Neighborhood Authoress.
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
16,995
Name
Jemma
No. The only players who should be demanding more money are the players who have retired and are currently suffering. Just another reason to hate OBJ.
 

iced

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
6,620
Odell,

talk to me about Pay and Danger when you serve your country.
 

iced

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
6,620
Bet the giants front office can't wait to negotiate a new contract with him in 4 years