Ramrock 1
Rookie
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2017
- Messages
- 331
Absolutely
SNF: Bears at Rams
- Thread starter CGI_Ram
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Psycho_X
Legend
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 11,234
17-7
LARAMSinFeb.
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2016
- Messages
- 4,452
17-7 Rams
fearsomefour
Legend
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2013
- Messages
- 17,123
Who do the Bears go after this offseason?
Brkdgewater?
OC--LeftCoast
Agent Provocateur
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2012
- Messages
- 3,695
- Name
- Greg
17-7
rdlkgliders
"AKA" Hugo Bezdek
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2013
- Messages
- 7,863
- Name
- Don
17 - 7
RamWoodie
Legend
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2014
- Messages
- 5,034
YEAH...BUT WE'RE ALL CONCERNED!!! Why did McVay wait so long to open up the offense????
That's the kind of stuff that boggles the mind. WHAT IS GOING ON!!!
fearsomefour
Legend
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2013
- Messages
- 17,123
Since Ramsey came over....
10 points
10 points
10 points (not putting the Pitts D TD on the D)
7 points
None of them elite teams but that is impressive.
Ravens....well, that’ll be a test.
10 points
10 points
10 points (not putting the Pitts D TD on the D)
7 points
None of them elite teams but that is impressive.
Ravens....well, that’ll be a test.
simonblaze
Pro Bowler
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2014
- Messages
- 1,108
- Name
- Simonblaze
Amen my Ram brother...I didnt get to key in on Corbett or Evans as much as I wouldve liked but the unit DEF appeared to do their part especially against the Bears pass rush...
Jacobarch
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2016
- Messages
- 4,937
- Name
- Jake
Nah bruh. Theres no need to even say that. Sorry not gonna back off that one
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2013
- Messages
- 6,423
- Name
- Scott
Win or lose next week, it would not be a conf loss, but you would have to win out. 11-5, w/ only 3 conf losses likley gets you in.
Still think Seattle or the Vikings (more likley Vikings) end up w/ 5 losses... And they do play each other so there is one more for one of them.
Even the Niners have a shot to lose quite a few. They have GB, @Saints, @Ravens, @Seahawks, and of course we have to beat them for this to matter.
Had Vikings and Niners lost today, it would have been a great day and I would actually feel good about our chances.
Still think Seattle or the Vikings (more likley Vikings) end up w/ 5 losses... And they do play each other so there is one more for one of them.
Even the Niners have a shot to lose quite a few. They have GB, @Saints, @Ravens, @Seahawks, and of course we have to beat them for this to matter.
Had Vikings and Niners lost today, it would have been a great day and I would actually feel good about our chances.
Mikey Ram
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2014
- Messages
- 3,398
- Name
- Mike
Yeah, I really would have won betting the under @ 49, even if they played a double header..
shovelpass
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2014
- Messages
- 4,242
MachS
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2017
- Messages
- 3,833
Question now is if our young RT plays well against the Ravens, what's the plan with Hav? Was impressed with the physicality of Corbett, Evans, and Edwards. Blythe seems more comfortable at center too I agree there. Bears have a legit front and if we can do something similar against the ravens damn that would be great!!!