shecocks fans thoughts on today

[RamBall]

http://seahawks.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=99165

 

[NukeRam]

 

[yrba1]

Drinking the tears of Seahawks fans invigorates my youth.

 

[Rams Until I Die]

Love it

 

[blue4]

Any one of them would wilt and fade away after 2 games as a Rams fan.

 

[the zohan]

They should learn the damn rules. Coach couldnt challenge. NY did review obviously seen it was not needed to be reviewed from the point of Seattle getting possession of the ball, the ball was clearly rolling back between Shermans legs then disappeared into the scrum. At that point there is nothing to review, its on the officials to figure out who has possession in the pile. Refs ruled Rams so what exactly do you review

 

[wmc540]

Harkey... not Hankins! ha

 

[bluecoconuts]

Sounds like us...

 

[RhodyRams]

They should learn the damn rules. Coach couldnt challenge. NY did review obviously seen it was not needed to be reviewed from the point of Seattle getting possession of the ball, the ball was clearly rolling back between Shermans legs then disappeared into the scrum. At that point there is nothing to review, its on the officials to figure out who has possession in the pile. Refs ruled Rams so what exactly do you review

actually any turnover with in 2 minutes should be automatically reviewed. The replay official never buzzed down to the field, which is why it wasnt reviewed. But both Mike Carey (CBS) and Mike Perriera (Fox) both said, there is no clear proof who actually recovers the ball, but a Rams player emerged with it, so that is the ruling

 

[rhinobean]

Sounds like the officiating sucks league wide!

 

[Rambition]

Drinking the tears of Seahawks fans invigorates my youth.

man, that's fucking poetic.

 

[the zohan]

actually any turnover with in 2 minutes should be automatically reviewed. The replay official never buzzed down to the field, which is why it wasnt reviewed. But both Mike Carey (CBS) and Mike Perriera (Fox) both said, there is no clear proof who actually recovers the ball, but a Rams player emerged with it, so that is the ruling

VP of officiating in NY stated he reviewed it and seen no evidence of either team having control so it was not buzzed down to the field since in his view it was a judgemental call on who had possession in the scrum by the officials

 

[Jumava1968]

They flat out got beat but can't accept it

 

[Thordaddy]

I was there wished them a good flight home

 

[kurtfaulk]

.

There are a couple of smart fans in there. looking at the video wouldn't have proven anything so there was no point reviewing it on the field.

.

 

[bluecollarram]

They should learn the damn rules. Coach couldnt challenge. NY did review obviously seen it was not needed to be reviewed from the point of Seattle getting possession of the ball, the ball was clearly rolling back between Shermans legs then disappeared into the scrum. At that point there is nothing to review, its on the officials to figure out who has possession in the pile. Refs ruled Rams so what exactly do you review

We need to give their fans a learning curve...

They just started watching the game last year

 

[Elmgrovegnome]

We need to give their fans a learning curve...

They just started watching the game last year

Love it. You summed it up perfectly!

 

[apatl187]

Lol

 

[apatl187]

 

[jrry32]

They sound like us...except the bad calls they cited were actually not bad calls. The refereeing did seem a bit uneven in that game(especially on the offensive holding front). First game all year the Rams were getting the benefit of the refs. But that final play was not an example of it. Harkey came out of the pile with the ball. There was no clear recovery on tape. No reason to review the play.