sammy sammy and sammy

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
Well, there are different schools of thought on that, but now we know where you stand. (y)

Welcome to the board, boyeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
 

max

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
3,010
Name
max
We need a lot of stuff.

We needed a CB more than a DT in 2006, so we took Tye Hill instead of Ngata.
The next year we needed a DT more than a CB, so we took Adam Carriker instead of Revis.

If Walter Jones is staring you in the face, maybe you don't pass on him to take Sammy Watkins.
 

laramsoriginal

Starter
Joined
Jan 5, 2014
Messages
604
Im good not even drafting a WR this year

Op, based on value/ team need, my list of priorities:

CB
FS
OG
OT
LB
DT
RB
WR
 

RFIP

Guest
WR is certainly 1 or 1a my friend and I could be persuaded that Watkins is a decent enough wr to pick. :)
 
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
5,808
I'd love to draft Sammy, but I'd also love to protect Sam and run the ball and defend the pass. If we can do all 3 awesome, if we can only do two of the three I'll sacrifice drafting Sammy.
 

RFIP

Guest
I'd love to draft Sammy, but I'd also love to protect Sam and run the ball and defend the pass. If we can do all 3 awesome, if we can only do two of the three I'll sacrifice drafting Sammy.

Well I think we have proven that no matter how well you protect Bradford if you don't have people with the ability to get open and make catches it doesn't matter.

Do it the Peyton way (Harrison, Wayne, Clark, Faulk, James) then (Decker, Thomas, Thomas and Welker) and you don't get hit nearly as often because you don't have to hold the ball.
 

max

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
3,010
Name
max
Well I think we have proven that no matter how well you protect Bradford if you don't have people with the ability to get open and make catches it doesn't matter.

Do it the Peyton way (Harrison, Wayne, Clark, Faulk, James) then (Decker, Thomas, Thomas and Welker) and you don't get hit nearly as often because you don't have to hold the ball.

Keep in mind, Sam does not have Peyton's ability to avoid getting sacked, he needs a much better OL than Peyton does.
 
Joined
Aug 15, 2013
Messages
5,808
Well I think we have proven that no matter how well you protect Bradford if you don't have people with the ability to get open and make catches it doesn't matter.

Do it the Peyton way (Harrison, Wayne, Clark, Faulk, James) then (Decker, Thomas, Thomas and Welker) and you don't get hit nearly as often because you don't have to hold the ball.

When did we prove that? I thought we proved that if you give Sam time and can run the ball then Sam plays the best football of his life?
 

RFIP

Guest
LOL just how does Peyton "avoid sacks"?

Does he shake tacklers? Does he run away from them? Does his line give him all day a la Brady?

No. No. And no.

He does have the great abilty to find the mismatch most times but that is MUCH enhanced by the fact he has ALWAYS played with world class talents, the likes of which I have already noted.

Funny though how in the SB when his receivers finally couldn't get open he looked like a struggling, shaken, turnover prone QB.

Give Sam the weapons and the line will be just fine as it was last year.

Keep in mind, Sam does not have Peyton's ability to avoid getting sacked, he needs a much better OL than Peyton does.
 

blackbart

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
6,226
Name
Tim
we need sammy watkins not a ot first
Welcome to the board

Have to pass on Watkins there are other positions of greater need. Protecting Bradford has to be the highest priority it wouldn't do any good to have megatron if Bradford is being hit in 2 seconds or less every time he drops back.
 

mr.stlouis

Legend
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
6,454
Name
Main Hook
I'd love to draft Sammy, but I'd also love to protect Sam and run the ball and defend the pass. If we can do all 3 awesome, if we can only do two of the three I'll sacrifice drafting Sammy.

Very true. If our running game is going strong then we're good. However, when our running is shut down that's when we need Watkins.
 

max

Hall of Fame
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
3,010
Name
max
we need sammy watkins not a ot first

Welcome aboard.

I will say this regarding Sammy. He is in the top tier group of players in this draft. Greg Cosell said he's the best WR to come out since AJ Green and Julio Jones. So he certainly would be a great add.

Thing is, there are about 3 or 4 players (excluding QBs) in this draft that are better than anyone from last year. I believe we need to come away with one of them.

Clowney, Robinson, Watkins, and maybe Matthews. I expect Snead to get one of them. He said he wants HOFers. Well, you don't pass on all of those guys.
 

RFIP

Guest
Welcome to the board

Have to pass on Watkins there are other positions of greater need. Protecting Bradford has to be the highest priority it wouldn't do any good to have megatron if Bradford is being hit in 2 seconds or less every time he drops back.

Sam has enough time to throw the rock, ESPECIALLY working off our run game. The issue, plain and simple is the wr's. Not to mention, adding a great wr will help eleviate some of the running issue we had in SF, in Seattle and in Arizona because those teams won't be loading the box..."or else."