Saffold offers flexibility in many ways : Wagoner

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamBill

Legend
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
8,874
Saffold offers flexibility in many ways
By Nick Wagoner

http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/6735/saffold-offers-flexibility-in-many-ways

EARTH CITY, Mo. -- A wild Wednesday evening that resulted in the St. Louis Rams keeping Rodger Saffold on a five-year contract gives the Rams much more than just a talented, if injury-plagued, offensive lineman. It offers them flexibility in shaping the offensive line and in ways they can approach the rest of the offseason.

Versatility has long been one of Saffold's greatest strengths, his ability to shift from either tackle spot to both guard spots is one of the primary reasons the Rams coveted him in the first place. The on-field portion of Saffold's return means he'll jump in as a guard, the position where he was best in 2013. It's also a position where many believe Saffold offers Pro Bowl potential.

But in the event left tackle Jake Long isn't recovered from offseason knee surgery, Saffold has the ability to step in at tackle and play well as he did the final two games of last season. While the Rams still have plenty of work to do in reshaping the offensive line, keeping Saffold can cover up multiple leaks that might spring up in the meantime.

Perhaps more important in the here and now is what Saffold's return means for the Rams as they move toward the NFL draft. There's no way of knowing whether the Rams' draft plans were significantly altered by Saffold's expected departure. The same can be said of guard Chris Williams' contract with the Buffalo Bills. Or the likely exit of guard Shelley Smith.

If nothing else, those moves offered a clear indication that something, actually many things, would have to be done to patch up the offensive line. On the same token, Saffold's return isn't a cure-all either. He clearly has an injury history of his own but he at least offers some comfort because of that aforementioned versatility.

One of the worst things a team can do in the draft is make picks solely based on need but without Saffold the Rams likely would have been backed into a corner of needing offensive linemen, maybe earlier than ever.

Bringing Saffold back certainly won't preclude the Rams from investigating options on the line and one can make a good argument that adding another elite piece to the line early in the draft would be the boon needed to make the line ready for the rigors of the NFC West.

But if the Rams do opt to go a different direction with the second overall pick, it's a decision much easier to comprehend now than it was before the words "failed physical" took Twitter by storm.
 

Boffo97

Still legal in 17 states!
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
5,278
Name
Dave
That's basically been my attitude.

Before the re-sign, I was dreading the idea of having to go into the draft basically with a gun to our head of signing Robinson/Matthews and/or a top guard... with the AND part there being a strong possibility.

Now, if we don't get a guard in the 1st two rounds, it won't be the end of the world (though I strongly prefer we do and could even live with the tackle as guard temporarily plan). Just as if we don't get a #1 WR, that won't be the end of the world. But we have options either way (or even trading out of the top ten). That can only be a good thing.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,132
Name
Burger man
I want Saffold planted inside. No more tackle. Wrap him in bubble wrap.