As an aside, and not saying anyone on this board does it, so more for the benefit of the lurkers:
Some people use the term "restructure" in the more vernacular sense to refer basically to a volunatary salary reduction. That's all nice.
Other people use the term "restructure" in the more techinical caponomics sense to refer to the accounting method approved (or not disapproved) under the CBA described by OTC as "In a restructure, a team converts some of a player's non-guaranteed base salary or bonuses into a guaranteed signing bonus, of which is prorated through the remaining years of a player's contract. Restructuring is a common manuever to gain room for the current cap year at the cost of adding liabilities against future cap years." That's also all nice.
It's just that when some people use "restructure" in one sense to try to talk to people using "restructure" in the other sense, all kinds of miscommunication merriment ensues.
Not a rant, just an observation.