Rams mailbag: On linebackers, L.A. and More/Wagoner

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamBill

Legend
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
8,874
Rams mailbag: On linebackers, L.A. and more
By Nick Wagoner | ESPN.com

http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/16442/rams-mailbag-on-linebackers-l-a-and-more

INDIANAPOLIS -- The NFL combine is in full swing with workouts underway and free agency rapidly approaching. Lots of rumors and speculation will fill the coming months and there are plenty of questions to get to.

SuperCoolioMan @Smerc14
Any chance the Rams pick up a linebacker within the first two rounds? I'm starting to hear rumors...


@nwagoner: I probably should have added linebacker when someone asked last week what a surprise position could be for the Rams to address this offseason. Not necessarily because they are going to make it a priority but because they want and need depth there. Think of it like Aaron Donald and defensive tackle last year. The Rams didn't have a major pressing need but wanted to upgrade there and Donald was clearly the best player available. Only if such a situation were to unfold would that seem to push linebacker up the list. Remember, a year ago they were on Alabama's C.J. Mosley but they went Donald at No. 13 instead. The Rams will likely use their "big nickel" look a lot with Mark Barron as the de facto third linebacker but it wouldn't be a complete surprise if they addressed the position earlier than expected if the right player falls into their lap.

Dave of House Alward @KingDavidTheXV
So who do you think will play C for Rams next year? Looking OL early in draft or in FA?


@nwagoner: It's a good question and one that I'm not sure the Rams have an answer for just yet. Scott Wells is still a possibility though whether they keep him or release him for cap space will depend on who they think they can get to replace him. Tim Barnes is a restricted free agent but even if he's brought back it will likely be in a depth role. Barrett Jones is still around but needs to prove he can stay healthy and handle the job before he gets a shot. And don't forget about Demetrius Rhaney. I'm told the Rams are high on Rhaney's potential but he still has a lot of proving to do before he can get an opportunity. There could be appealing free agents on the market, including the Kansas City Chiefs' Rodney Hudson. If the Rams do choose to spend money in free agency, Hudson would make a lot of sense so long as his price doesn't go out of control.

Jim Garrison @garrison_jim
Nick you've been pretty down the middle on Rams stadium issue, what do you think happens here

@nwagoner: It's going to sound like a non-answer but the reality is that nobody really knows what's going to happen. As we sit here right now, I think there's momentum in the favor of St. Louis and the Rams staying there. The announcement of the shared stadium with the San Diego Chargers and Oakland Raiders changes the outlook, at least on paper. But there's a long way to go before their plan becomes reality. We have three stadium possibilities -- two in Los Angeles and one in St. Louis -- and right now they are all pretty drawings and renderings. Until financing comes together and dirt starts turning on stadiums (the dirt turning in Inglewood is not on the stadium but the development around it), we won't know which direction this is going to go. There's a lot of variables at play here. The NFL is the only entity that could really give you a good idea. Next month's owners meetings should be awfully interesting.

Kevin Hoffmann @LiveFromKevin
Any news on free agents at combine? Love to have Kendricks/Britt back at good price

@nwagoner: The Rams are still working on those things but when you get this close to free agency, it's rare to sign guys before they hit the market without overpaying. That doesn't seem like something the Rams will do. Heard some scuttle here that Lance Kendricks might get something in the range of $4 million per year. Not sure the Rams would want to go to that level if it happened but his market will be more clear later on. I still think Kenny Britt returns to St. Louis but he might take a look around too because the other top receivers will likely get tagged which could leave him as one of the better options and thus, more money.

Christopher Huff @huffster21
Seems to me with how good this OL class is, should take one in 1st and 2nd round, and grab a QB in the 3rd? Thoughts?


@nwagoner: I don't think there's anyway you pigeonhole yourself into positions, especially in February, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if the Rams doubled up on offensive linemen within the first three rounds and used the other pick on a quarterback. How that breaks down remains to be seen but the obvious need is in those two spots. Problem is going to be finding the right value in a quarterback. Offensive line should be a bit easier given the depth in that group.

stay up lemon @lemonjii
What draft qb fits the ram's offense best potentially, is it better that they don't/offer something distinct (ex: bh17)?


@nwagoner: I'm not sure there's really a definitive answer to this because every quarterback is a projection. I have my doubts about a guy like Brett Hundley fitting in because he needs a lot of work and the offensive philosophy is so much different from what he did in college. However, I think new quarterback coach Chris Weinke might be something of a game changer in all of this. He's worked with quarterbacks of all shapes, sizes and talents and might be the guy to get the most out of Hundley. Jameis Winston is the only quarterback in this year's draft who looks like he has a chance to contribute right away (unless Marcus Mariota lands in Philadelphia) but I don't think there's a realistic way for the Rams to land him.
 

Thordaddy

Binding you with ancient logic
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
10,462
Name
Rich
@nwagoner: It's going to sound like a non-answer but the reality is that nobody really knows what's going to happen. As we sit here right now, I think there's momentum in the favor of St. Louis and the Rams staying there. The announcement of the shared stadium with the San Diego Chargers and Oakland Raiders changes the outlook, at least on paper. But there's a long way to go before their plan becomes reality. We have three stadium possibilities -- two in Los Angeles and one in St. Louis -- and right now they are all pretty drawings and renderings. Until financing comes together and dirt starts turning on stadiums (the dirt turning in Inglewood is not on the stadium but the development around it), we won't know which direction this is going to go. There's a lot of variables at play here. The NFL is the only entity that could really give you a good idea. Next month's owners meetings should be awfully interesting

Some people would have us believe they were already under construction SSSSSooooooo, maybe Stan is providing a stadium sight as a magnet around which he develops ,his main line of business, ANOTHER possibility, interesting
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
Some people would have us believe they were already under construction SSSSSooooooo, maybe Stan is providing a stadium sight as a magnet around which he develops ,his main line of business, ANOTHER possibility, interesting
I've seen the site, the digging and it doesn't seem to be enough room for a stadium and parking...But perfect for a walmat...
 

PressureD41

Les Snead's Draft Advisor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
3,803
Name
Eddy
Didn't the wall mart get voted down?
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
33,891
Name
Stu
Didn't the wall mart get voted down?
Yeah. I don't think Walmart is happening. Besides, I don't think Stan has ever actually been the developer of any Walmart stores but has been involved in developments around them and as the main developer of the larger project. I realize his wife is who she is and all but I think people make too much of a connection because of that fact. I suppose this still doesn't mean he couldn't do a development that also contained a Walmart. But the citizens of Inglewood voted down a Walmart and in order to change the plan for the almost 400 acres, he'd likely have to go back to the voters. Probably not going to happen.
 

Legatron4

Legend
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
9,427
Name
Wes
It really pisses me off that Scott Wells is even a thought to come back next year. I don't wanna hear that if he was healthier he could play better. That's bullshit. He's awful. He needs to be the first guy cut.
 

Amitar

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,096
Name
Amitar
It really pisses me off that Scott Wells is even a thought to come back next year. I don't wanna hear that if he was healthier he could play better. That's bullcrap. He's awful. He needs to be the first guy cut.
I can't like this post enough.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
21,801
Yeah. I don't think Walmart is happening. Besides, I don't think Stan has ever actually been the developer of any Walmart stores but has been involved in developments around them and as the main developer of the larger project. I realize his wife is who she is and all but I think people make too much of a connection because of that fact. I suppose this still doesn't mean he couldn't do a development that also contained a Walmart. But the citizens of Inglewood voted down a Walmart and in order to change the plan for the almost 400 acres, he'd likely have to go back to the voters. Probably not going to happen.

I refused to shop at Walmart as a matter of principle. Then when Stan came along I felt it indirectly helped my team so I started going there to shop. Now you tell me this. Great.
 

So Ram

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
14,193
I've seen the site, the digging and it doesn't seem to be enough room for a stadium and parking...But perfect for a walmat...
Just wondering then .Did they tear down Hollywood Park already ? What about the casino & everything back there.
Like Nick said,nobody knows.
I call false reporting on your part,or you don't actually know what your looking at.Stan's little piece of property next to the forum is nothing.It is the whole site that goes back well over a mile easy.It actually will go to century BLvd.The property
--Stan invested with that group project.Police actually have the plans.
Your either a Ram fan or not.I'm glad Stan has pushed the issue,& without him non of this would be really possible.
Remember Stan is a soccer fan.I donknow
I've seen the site, the digging and it doesn't seem to be enough room for a stadium and parking...But perfect for a walmat...
SURELY don't Get No STREET credit !!!!
That up there is a horrible statement,& everything is not how it seems.
I'll just say Stan is going to make Inglewood a better place,& they'll have a park you can walk through & feel safe.That in it's self is COOL !!
I'm a Rams Fan by choice. Glad to see a stadium (s) finally in LA area(county).
I'll say this.
---LA will have a Super Bowl & The Olyimpics in the next 10 years.
Go Rams !!!
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
Just wondering then .Did they tear down Hollywood Park already ? What about the casino & everything back there.
Like Nick said,nobody knows.
I call false reporting on your part,or you don't actually know what your looking at.Stan's little piece of property next to the forum is nothing.It is the whole site that goes back well over a mile easy.It actually will go to century BLvd
They are digging. They have not demolished the entire racetrack, but seem to be in the process of doing just that. They are actually, as I write this, tearing up the parking lot. The casino is still up and running and looks to me they aren't going anywhere....They put a blue print on this site a while ago that shows how much property he purchased...I remember it being not large enough for a stadium & parking, and new roadways to get outta there. It looks too small compared to the types of stadiums I've seen in person (Arizona) & on TV (Jerry's house in Dallas).

SURELY don't Get No STREET credit !!!!
Street credit? Is that something I can spend in a swap meet?
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
33,891
Name
Stu
Just wondering then .Did they tear down Hollywood Park already ? What about the casino & everything back there.
Like Nick said,nobody knows.
I call false reporting on your part,or you don't actually know what your looking at.Stan's little piece of property next to the forum is nothing.It is the whole site that goes back well over a mile easy.It actually will go to century BLvd.The property
--Stan invested with that group project.Police actually have the plans.
Your either a Ram fan or not.I'm glad Stan has pushed the issue,& without him non of this would be really possible.
Remember Stan is a soccer fan.I donknow

SURELY don't Get No STREET credit !!!!
That up there is a horrible statement,& everything is not how it seems.
I'll just say Stan is going to make Inglewood a better place,& they'll have a park you can walk through & feel safe.That in it's self is COOL !!
I'm a Rams Fan by choice. Glad to see a stadium (s) finally in LA area(county).
I'll say this.
---LA will have a Super Bowl & The Olyimpics in the next 10 years.
Go Rams !!!
Easy man. I'm guessing that what he is referring to is the part that is being dug up right now - not the whole project. Don't go jumping ugly on someone even if you DO feel they were wrong - which I don't believe he is from the reports I've read elsewhere. I think what he is simply saying is that the part they have dug up isn't for the stadium just yet.

Either way, being rude to another poster isn't acceptable around here. Cool your jets.