Possibility of Vikings making the Super Bowl presents unique challenges for NFL

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,154
Name
Burger man
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/...uper-bowl-presents-unique-challenges-for-nfl/

Possibility of Vikings making the Super Bowl presents unique challenges for NFL

No team has ever played at home in the Super Bowl. In 51 games, there has not been a single team that's gotten the unique advantage of playing in front of its home crowd. The Super Bowl is meant to be a neutral site game, but the Vikings have a chance to change that this year. They're the second seed in the NFC, and they could play two games at home or have to travel to Philadelphia to face the Eagles, sans Carson Wentz, in the NFC Championship.

Either way, it has been a long time since a team has had the shot that the Vikings do. When the Vikings host the Saints on Sunday (4:40 ET, FOX), it will mark the first time in NFL history that a Super Bowl host has played a divisional game at home. And if the Vikings make it all the way to the Super, undermining the neutral site game, the league's events crew already has a plan to try and curb the home field advantage.

"We're watching it closely, no question about it, and we have been for a while," Peter O'Reilly, the league's senior vice president of events, told Sports Illustrated. "The good thing is there is a really detailed contingency plan in place that hasn't had to be rolled out before, but is in place. We've been talking with the Vikings and the host committee throughout the back-half of this regular season on a regular basis on all the different scenarios. It adds another factor for sure, but we feel good about the planning in place."

Throughout the Super Bowl's history, there have been two games that were, in essence, home games. The 1979 Los Angeles Rams played the Pittsburgh Steelers in Super Bowl XIV at The Rose Bowl; and the 1984 San Francisco 49ers played the Miami Dolphins in Super Bowl XVIX, played at Stanford Stadium. To circumvent home field, the NFL first took the host team's 15 percent of tickets and divvied that up equally. "Home" teams also stayed in hotels rather than their homes.

Teams also practiced at home during Super Bowl week, which the NFL allowed at the time. "We are very focused on making sure that the two facilities are equitable, and our football operations side takes a lot of time to make sure the two facilities that we're delivering to the two Super Bowl teams have equivalent facilities in terms of space, opportunity for meeting rooms and access to facilities and weight rooms," O'Reilly told SI. "A lot of time and energy goes into that. If you're in your own facility it's what you know and you're comfortable with that."

Home-field advantage on the field, however, may not be a huge concern. Ticket sales are divided equally, and although there would invariably be a Vikings' bias, the Super Bowl is largely a media and corporate event. A lot of guests are fans of football, or don't have a vested interest in the game. That isn't always the case, and of course there is always the rabid fan turnout, but it isn't the same as the rest of the playoffs.

Although the Vikings possibly playing at home raises a lot of issues, they still have to win two games to get there. And if they do get in the Super Bowl, the NFL at least has a plan in place to keep things as fair as possible.
 

Kevin

Pro Bowler
Joined
Sep 8, 2014
Messages
1,382
In 51 games, there has not been a single team that's gotten the unique advantage of playing in front of its home crowd.

I stopped reading right there. The writer thinks this is a home game in front of Viking season ticket holders. It's not.
 

Legatron4

Legend
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
9,427
Name
Wes
In 51 games, there has not been a single team that's gotten the unique advantage of playing in front of its home crowd.

I stopped reading right there. The writer thinks this is a home game in front of Viking season ticket holders. It's not.
That’s what I’ve been thinking about. Super Bowl tickets are upwards of $3,000. You think people in Minnesota have that sorta pocket change laying around 2 weeks before the game? Most of the seats are sold years in advance. It might be slightly louder towards the Vikings, but not a homefield advantage.
 

Alaskan Ram

Last Frontier Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
1,072
In 51 games, there has not been a single team that's gotten the unique advantage of playing in front of its home crowd.

I stopped reading right there. The writer thinks this is a home game in front of Viking season ticket holders. It's not.
I have a hard time believing that superbowl host cities in the past did not have a majority in attendance from the host city general vicinity.
 

Ellard80

Legend
Joined
Aug 11, 2016
Messages
6,320
Is this trying to say that they will move the game? Was a lot of insinuation.
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
33,914
Name
Stu
I guess they'll be really pissed when we're playing in it in Inglewood.
 

kmramsfan

Old School Ram Fan
Joined
May 30, 2011
Messages
684
Name
Keith
Any one know why the Rams- Steelers Super Bowl wasn't considered a home game for the Rams? Please don't say because they played in Anaheim
 

Soul Surfer

Legend
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
6,419
Name
Charles Mazyck
Maybe the home-field advantage will help the Vikings destroy New England and finally put them out of their misery.
 

LARams_1963

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 29, 2016
Messages
2,735
Name
greg
Any one know why the Rams- Steelers Super Bowl wasn't considered a home game for the Rams? Please don't say because they played in Anaheim
Well, they didn't play in Anaheim :) in 1979 they were still in the Coliseum. Technically of course the game wasn't in their stadium, hence "Officially" not a homefield advantage. In that day though the ticket prices hadn't gotten that far out of control so their was a pretty good Rams crowd of "Normal" fans and I think you have to consider it a home field advantage.
 

Kevin

Pro Bowler
Joined
Sep 8, 2014
Messages
1,382
The NFL makes a certain number of tickets available to each team in the SB, so there will be about an equal number of fans at the game for each team. The rest go to corporations and the highest bidder who are there mostly to party. The field is the same size, the locker rooms are still just locker rooms and both teams get all the Gatorade they can drink. There is no in-game advantage to the Vikings, IMO.

They would benefit from practicing in their own facilities instead of whatever they set up in another host city. Really, that's about it. Not a big deal as some people in the media would make it to be.
 

DaveFan'51

Old-Timer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 18, 2014
Messages
18,666
Name
Dave
The NFL makes a certain number of tickets available to each team in the SB, so there will be about an equal number of fans at the game for each team. The rest go to corporations and the highest bidder who are there mostly to party. The field is the same size, the locker rooms are still just locker rooms and both teams get all the Gatorade they can drink. There is no in-game advantage to the Vikings, IMO.

They would benefit from practicing in their own facilities instead of whatever they set up in another host city. Really, that's about it. Not a big deal as some people in the media would make it to be.
The Media believe it's there Job to "Hype" everything! Be it Players-Stats-Location-Weather, you name it, " Put a Good Spin on it!" Even if it's a "No Contest game" like say, The Patriots vs the Brown's! They can't be Honest!
 

“Turbo set!”

Pro Bowler
Joined
Nov 22, 2017
Messages
1,303
I don't see how there is any discussion. The tickets are distributed throughout the league's teams.

I believe between the allotment for each team and the home team makes probably 20% or maybe a little more.
 

fearsomefour

Legend
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
17,100
This article is dumb.
The NFL will just do what they always do....run
It by Kraft and ask what his preference is.