Peter King: MMQB - 4/4/16

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
These are only excerpts. To read the whole article click the link below.
************************************************************************
http://mmqb.si.com/mmqb/2016/04/03/...e-broncos-49ers-titans-jalen-ramsey-nfl-draft

On Kaepernick, Kelly and the Player Who Could Upend the NFL Draft
The Broncos are trying to finalize a deal to get Colin Kaepernick from the Niners. Plus Chip Kelly finally gets to meet his new team, an update on Dr. Z and why an NFL-wide defensive shift may lead to activity atop the draft
By Peter King

mmqb-kaepernick-miller.jpg

Colin Kaepernick and Von Miller, future teammates in Denver? The Broncos reportedly are trying to make it happen.
Joe Mahoney/AP


No new news about the status of a certain 49er quarterback—Sunday was very quiet in the Colin Kaepernick derby—but we do have some information about the first pick in the 2016 NFL Draft. Specifically: The Titans might have some action on the No. 1 slot.

But first …

As we careen toward the draft a little more than three weeks from now, there’s one nagging asterisk: the status of Colin Kaepernick. He’s not a Bronco yet, and I suppose there’s a chance he won’t be. But I ask you these two questions:

1. If the 49ers wanted desperately to keep Kaepernick, would they have allowed him twice to meet with Denver GM John Elway—one of those meetings being at Elway’s house in Denver?

2. With the Broncos in such salary-cap purgatory, would Kaepernick have even entered into these discussion if he wanted to keep his career alive in San Francisco?

No, and no.

As one person close to these incendiary discussions told me Sunday night, the ball is in Kaepernick’s court. If he wants to be traded to Denver, he’ll have to take a significant pay cut from his $11.9-million compensation this year to do so. I am going to try to put this in some logical terms: Kaepernick clearly wants out of San Francisco—which I think is knee-jerk for him, because he would be a good quarterback in Chip Kelly’s system. But going to Denver isn’t bad either, because the Broncos defense would mean he wouldn’t have to be a prolific passer in order to win.

So, he has to determine whether making $11.9 million this year as a Niner, or maybe $6 million as a Bronco, is the smart move. Neither is wrong. I would understand him thinking the Denver deal is smartest, because this is the defending Super Bowl champion, and having two terrific receivers and a strong defense—while making less money—is a good move. But if I were Kaepernick, I’d be thinking not of vengeance against an organization I hate, but rather of the ability to work with a coach, Kelly, who has been scorned and will be supremely motivated to do a great job with a new team.

I expect a decision this week. I expect Kaepernick will pick Denver.

* * *
mmqb-ramsey-jalen.jpg

Photo: Streeter Lecka/Getty Images
The combination of athleticism, strength and versatility has put defensive back Jalen Ramsey at the top of some draft boards around the NFL.

Speaking of the ball in someone’s court, meet Jalen Ramsey.

This is an odd place for a Stat of the Week, but I’ll explain why it's here in a moment:

Stat of the Week
The 2015 season was the seventh straight year for an increase in the number of defensive snaps in the NFL with five defensive back or more on the field. Per Pro Football Focus, here is the percentage of plays in NFL games with five DBs or more on the field in every season since 2008:

2008: 43.4%
2009: 45.1%
2010: 48.8%
2011: 52.5%
2012: 54.4%
2013: 58.3%
2014: 60.3%
2015: 63.4%

This is revolutionary, really, and something we don’t talk about nearly enough. Five years ago, about half the defensive snaps in the league occurred with four defensive backs on the field; last season, it was almost two-thirds of the snaps with five or more defensive backs on the field per snap.

So why does this portend a revolution at the tip of the draft? Easy.

The Titans, holders of the first pick in the draft, will have a chance to make a deal. The Titans have received significant interest in the pick. I believe it is now 50-50 whether Tennessee will trade it or keep it. Rookie Tennessee GM Jon Robinson is going to have to decide whether to accept an offer—presumably by a team that wants one of the top two quarterbacks in the draft, Carson Wentz of North Dakota State or Cal’s Jared Goff—or to stay at number one and pick a player the Titans believe will be a cornerstone for years to come.

The leaders in the clubhouse for Tennessee are Laremy Tunsil, the Mississippi tackle, and defensive back Jalen Ramsey of Florida State. The Titans have a couple other players they’re seriously considering—aside from Tunsil and Ramsey, a Tennessean who really want to play close to home—but those two are the most logical.

A defensive back has been picked first overall only one time, in 1956, in the history of the NFL. But understand these reasons why times are changing in the NFL. Last season, the NFL saw records fall for touchdown passes allowed (842), for highest completion rate for quarterbacks (.630) and for passer rating (90.2). Ramsey became an interesting X factor for those reasons, and because the Titans are so desperate for help at both tackle and corner.

The pick will probably come down to Tunsil or Ramsey for Tennessee. Both will visit the Titans in the coming weeks, and that will provide more clarity. It’s been thought that Tunsil was more logical, but there are a few things making Tennessee do more homework on him. He is a natural left tackle, to be sure. But he isn’t a classic downhill left tackle, which the Titans want; they just traded for bullish back DeMarco Murray and want to run the ball significantly. And players with history in a college spread offense, like Tunsil, have to adjust, and that’s no sure thing.

The NFL, as the Pro Football Focusnumbers show, has transitioned into more of a three-down passing league. Ramsey had only three interceptions in the past three college seasons at Florida State, but he seems the most pro-ready corner in this draft. He’s a 6-1, 210-pound specimen with the ability to cover the kind of big receivers the league is fielding today.

He can play cornerback, he can move inside and cover the slot receiver, and he can play a center-field kind of safety if need be. He’s the kind of versatile defensive back every coach wants. The Titans have a crying need at tackle, after allowing more sacks than any team in football last fall. But they also need a corner and a nickel defender as well, and defensive coordinator Dick LeBeau would froth at the chance to use a player with the blitzing and tackling skills of Ramsey.

So … do not assume Tennessee is locked into Tunsil. Robinson certainly could take him. But the top of the draft is in flux, and I will not be surprised if in the next three weeks the Titans move the pick for an extra high pick or picks—even though there’s not the Andrew Luck or Marcus Mariota out there to move up and grab. But there are teams like San Francisco or Los Angeles or Philadelphia that might want a quarterback, and might be desperate enough to overpay for the top pick.

* * *
mmqb-kelly-chip-niners.jpg

Photo: Ezra Shaw/Getty Images
New coach Chip Kelly will hit the field for the first time with his 49ers players this week.

Chip Kelly has his hands full in San Francisco
The other day, NJ Advance Media reported that Eagles scouts had it up to herewith Chip Kelly, beginning with his first draft in Philadelphia in 2013. It reminded me that until a coach wins, and wins big, there’s going to be great skepticism, regardless of the coach’s résumé. “Right before that draft, the scouts set the board,” a club official was reported to have said. “Then Chip got a hold of it and totally turned it around. Scouts had no say at all in that draft. Anybody that Chip didn’t want, that player’s card got removed from the board and thrown in the trash. Those guys were never even in the discussion. Almost immediately, you had a lot of scouts looking around and wondering, ‘Why am I even working? Why the hell are we even here?’”

I’m reminded of 2011, when the Patriots had the first pick of day two, No. 33 overall. The scouts, I’m told, were expecting the Patriots to pick one of two front-seven players, Jabaal Sheard or Brooks Reed. Instead, Belichick went with his gut, taking a tall corner with an injury history, Ras-I Dowling. He ended up being a bust. Sheard, particularly, and Reed haven’t been superstars, but they’ve had significantly better careers. Point is, you never heard a peep out of the Patriots, mostly because Belichick earned the right to pick whoever he wanted, with three Super Bowls at the time to his credit. And Kelly will get the skepticism until he wins.

Today, Kelly begins his second try to win in the NFL, after his 26-22 run with the Eagles that ended in his unceremonious firing by Jeffrey Lurie last December. At 8 a.m. Pacific Time today, he’ll get to meet with his players for the first time since being named coach of the team nearly three months ago. I talked to him about the past, and his future—but before the Colin Kaepernick news broke over the weekend.

MMQB: Does part of you feel like you’ve got to prove yourself as an NFL head coach?

Kelly: Not coming after what I’ve just gone through. I don’t look at it like that. I think you want to prove yourself every day. I want to prove myself after my first year, I want to prove myself after my second year, after my third year … I look at it that I landed in heaven and I am really excited to be in San Francisco. The organization is first class and it is about excellence. We’ve won 20 division titles since 1970, six NFC championships, five Super Bowls. You walk down the Bill Walsh Way on the way into the building and you’ll see five Super Bowl trophies in the lobby. It’s an unbelievable organization. How it is set up, the York family, what they do, how they treat people, I was blown away to be able to be part of that.

MMQB: Do you feel battered after the Philadelphia experience?

Kelly: No, not at all. I coach football in the NFL. I have one of the greatest jobs in the world. I don’t think I would ever feel battered.

MMQB: Biggest lesson learned in the NFL so far?

Kelly: Everybody has got to be on the same page.

MMQB: Players, front office, owner?

Kelly: Everybody, really, but it’s really important with the front office.

MMQB: How far away are the Niners from being really good again?

Kelly: I don't know. The unique thing about the CBA is I feel like I have been there for awhile, but I don’t know our players. [The 2011 Collective Bargaining Agreement mandates that new coaches are not allowed to have significant contact with their players till April, and the NFL's new coaches have their first contact with players today.] All you are allowed to do is introductory superficial conversations, Hey, how are you doing? So we really don't know what exactly we have. I mean, I know we have a lot of talented players, but until you work with them …

And I think the landscape changes even in the division, who is adding and subtracting players. You look at the Rams. James Laurinaitis isn’t there anymore, Chris Long isn’t there anymore. But Aaron Donald still is there though. So when you go through it, it will be interesting because in this league so much changes on a yearly basis that looking at film from a year ago and looking at it moving forward, you just go, Wow, it’s changed. And it happens fast. This team three years ago was on the 5-yard line going in at the end of the Super Bowl, that close to winning it all. Three years later, I’m the third coach they’ve had since. You can win the NFC championship one year, then win four games the next year. Things change fast.

MMQB: Cliché question, but I wonder when you look back at what you did at Oregon, and how the pro game is different from the college game, what’s the biggest difference?

Kelly: In the first game of our 2010 season, we beat New Mexico 72-0. No one beats anyone in the NFL 72-0. I think 55 percent of the games last year were decided by seven points or less, 24 percent by three points or less. It’s really intriguing, to be honest. Smaller rosters, obviously. We’d dress 100 guys for home games at Oregon. A lot of that was we used to use dressing for games as kind of a reward for guys who worked hard in the program. But now, with 53-man rosters, and you’re not even dressing all of those, you’ve got to use key starters on special teams. And when you eliminate eight offensive linemen and two quarterbacks and most of your defensive linemen, that means you have a pretty small pool to choose from for all of your special teams. That’s very big.

Then I’d say the talent is the biggest factor after that. It’s so close. You look at college football. There’s a saying that the top teams in the country—Alabama, Michigan, Michigan State, Ohio State, Wisconsin—they win nine games in February [through recruiting]. They pick the players they want. Here, of course, you can’t do that. So you have to find other ways to win. You’ve got to be smart about who you draft, who you develop and how you coach them. That’s the great challenge. I love the challenge of it.

* * *

Another important study about the long-term impact of football
We’re getting weary, understandably, of the flood of information about potential dangers of football, particularly at a young age, as it relates to brain maladies later in life. But I want to call your attention to a study published Thursday in the Journal of Neurotrauma that I find particularly important. A group at Boston University, led by MD/PhD candidate Philip Montenigro, studied 97 men who played youth, high school and college football but who did not play pro football. The group found that in the 93 players, the impact of cumulative head trauma led to later-life depression, cognitive impairment and apathy.

Montenigro assigned a value of cumulative head impact for each season each player played, based on the position played and number of games played per season, and totaled up the number. The higher the value, the more likely a player would be to have problems later in life. The “cumulative head impact index” was calculated through a combination of the football history reported by each player, along with the impact frequency recorded by the fairly new study of “accelerometers,” helmet sensors that have recently begun to record the number and intensity of subconcussive hits to players at different levels of football.

This study was focused more on the subconcussive hits (those that result in significant contact to the helmet but not a concussion-causing blow to the helmet) than concussions. Recent accelerometer studies, according to Montenigro’s study, estimated that high school players average 600 subconcussive hits to the head per season, while college players average 1,000. Then, the 93 players were polled to see about their current mental health. The more subconscussive blows, the study found, the higher chance of a brain-related malady later in life.

That’s not a surprise, and it’s not conclusive, either; 93 players is not an exhaustive study that proves anything beyond a doubt. But it is encouraging that Montenigro and his mentor in the survey, BU’s Robert Stern, were able to quantify that players who took more blows seem more likely to have mental issues down the road.

Talking to Stern on Saturday, he left me with the idea that parents and coaches and even the NFL should be using this study as another brick in the wall, and a cautionary look at cumulative head trauma. “We’re learning just enough now that we’re in the toddlerhood of studying the long-term effect of subconcussive blows,” Stern said. “A good analogy is this: I used to be a Little League coach. It’s been mandated for a while now that kids can’t pitch more than a certain number of pitches per game, per week.

The goal was to prevent that kid from an overuse injury, and everyone agrees that it’s a good idea to try to prevent these overuse injuries. Yet, we don’t do anything about the number of times a head gets hit in football, with the most important part of your body getting jostled, or taking a big blow. You drop Johnny off at youth football practice, and you don’t ever think, ‘I want to know how many times he gets hit in the head.’”

“That is absolutely what this study should be doing—getting people to start thinking about the cumulative effect of these repetitive blows to the head,” said Montenigro. “This research can’t say anything definitive, but it should give parents an idea that repeated blows at an early age, and not just concussions, should be monitored. What’s apparent is that concussions suffered did not predict cognitive impairment. But subconcussive hits did predict cognitive impairment, depression and apathy.”

* * *

Florida State kicker Roberto Aguayo, the most accurate kicker in NCAA history, is bidding to become the first kicker selected as high as the second round since the Jets picked Mike Nugent in round two in 2005. The MMQB’sJenny Vrentas is working on a story on Aguayo—who has a very good one to tell—for our site, which you’ll read in the coming days. Nugent is the only kicker in the past 15 drafts to be taken that high, and kickers and punters, generally, have been consigned to the later rounds of the draft. In fact, the only punters to be taken in the first three rounds of the past 15 drafts are Dustin Colquitt and Bryan Anger, each of whom was a third-round pick.

It’s probably wise, history says, to take kickers and punters later than earlier. Nugent, the 47th overall pick in 2005, is on his fourth team (Cincinnati) and is just 11 of 25 from 50+ yards in his career. Dustin Colquitt is the 16th-leading active punter in yards per boot (44.8), while the Jaguars let Anger go in free agency to Tampa Bay this season. Anger boomed the ball well, but his 39.8-yard net average last season was 22nd in the NFL.

The top three punters in the league last year were undrafted (Johnnie Hekker), a seventh-round pick (Pat McAfee) and undrafted (Matt Darr), respectively. The greatest kicker of this era, Adam Vinatieri, went undrafted out of South Dakota State. So Aguayo, obviously, is battling history.

* * *

Ten Things I Think I Think
1. I think the best thing I read from a player in the past week was from retiring Kansas City safety Husain Abdullah—a better player than he got credit—who told Tom Pelissero of USA Today: “I don’t want to be that boxer that just stayed around for too long.” Abdullah, 30, had five concussions in a seven-year span, and players with a history of concussions are apt to suffer them more readily. Good for him that he’s getting out now, just after the birth of his fourth child. Abdullah is one of the most thoughtful players in the league. I look forward to his next chapter.

2. I think longtime NFL publicist/conscience/commissioner-adviser Joe Browne will get more than one long paragraph noting his retirement after 50 years in the NFL here at The MMQB. That’ll happen later this month, when he’ll share a few stories on his half-century with the NFL, going back to age 17, when he started as a mailroom clerk on Feb. 15, 1965. Browne officially retired last Thursday. But let me give you one story he shared recently to detail how intimately he was involved in the behind-the-scenes operations of the league, this one during the Paul Tagliabue regime:

“Two of the few things I was jealous of in my career when it came to baseball was the so-called Hot Stove League and the ceremonial first pitch on opening day by the sitting president. However, when I approached commissioner Tagliabue in 2001 with my idea on how we could get President Bush 43 involved in ouropening day that September, Paul told me to do it, and not screw it up. Like many things in life, It turned out to be easier said than done.

“We wanted the president to flip a coin in the Rose Garden or wherever he would be that particular September weekend in order to kick-start our season-opening 1 p.m. ET games. We would have all the team captains and the referee in the middle of the field at the stadiums. The visiting team would call Heads or Tails. However, instead of the ref tossing the coin, we would have president Bush toss a coin and then let all the players, in-stadium fans, and TV viewers know the result. I was in charge of our Congressional and Federal Agencies relations in those days. I sent a letter to Karl Rove, who was the President’s go-to guy in those days and someone I knew on casual basis.

“After a series of calls to his office, Karl finally got back to me in early August. ‘Joe, I have your original letter sitting on my desk,’ he said. ‘Let me say one thing: The president was a baseball owner, not a football owner. I don’t think we can handle your request.”

“I was disappointed but recovered by telling Rove I had one other idea to get it done. Alex Spanos, the owner of the Chargers, was a tough real estate developer, self-made billionaire and owner of the Chargers. He was a top Republican and one of the biggest contributors to the President’s successful election campaign. When I asked Spanos a couple of days later, he told me he would see what he could do.

“Time went by.and each night I was sleeping less and less because not only had I promised Tagliabue but the clubs as well I would get it done. I took my younger son Randy out fishing for a couple of hours of relaxation on an August Friday. When we returned home and I checked in with the office, my assistant told me that Mr. Spanos had called three times and that he sounded upset. I was to call him at home. When I called his house in Stockton, Calif., the housekeeper told me he was resting but that if Joe Browne calls she should get him up.

“Spanos said, ‘Geez, son, where have you been. I had the President here in my house for a reception and I wanted HIM to tell you himself that he would do that coin toss. God, you can’t just disappear like that.’

“It was the one phone call I regret not taking during my 50 years at the league. The plan worked to perfection. The President tossed the coin on Sept. 9 in the Rose Garden in front of a national TV audience and with several Pop Warner players in uniform surrounding him. It was a great scene.

“Two days later, on Sept. 11, 2001, the entire world changed for the rest of our lives.”

3. I think Joe Browne had one way to begin a thought, which he used about 10 times in a conversation. “Me to you,” he’d say, and follow with some story or tip that most of the time didn’t sound all that private or newsy. But it’s how he began many pieces of information he thought valuable. And I always wondered how many got that “me to you” treatment. Last week, one of the long-time operatives put it this way: “When Joe would say, ‘Me to you,’ I figure he’d already shared it with about 50 other people.”

4. I think if the Raiders are going to move—and I am on record as fervently believing they belong forever in northern California—Las Vegas would be somewhere between fun and tolerable.

5. I think for those who didn’t know Eugene Parker, the super-agent who died Friday of cancer at age 60, this is how I described him: He was an honorable type who looked out for his clients well (as all agents do), but who always wanted the players to be in the right place for them, not just in the place they could earn the richest deal. I remember dealing with him last fall when I was trying to do a story on the recovery of Jason Pierre-Paul (a Parker client) after his fireworks accident. Parker engaged former NFL defensive line coach John Blake (who is now back in the league, with Buffalo) to help Pierre-Paul. Not just in player, Blake told me, but also with Pierre-Paul the person.

Blake told me Parker was worried about Pierre-Paul, and he wanted to make sure he didn’t just do drills and train him and then leave for the day. “Eugene said, ‘Jason needs you now,’” Blake told me, and added that he needed him to work on his confidence as well as his pass-rush moves. And Parker would call to check in with Blake, always asking how Pierre-Paul the person was doing. So many of his clients—Larry Fitzgerald, Devin Hester, Deion Sanders, Emmitt Smith—stressed Parker the person in their remarks after he died. The man will be missed, and not just by his clients.

6. I think if you want Muhammad Wilkerson of the Jets, you’d better offer more than a low first-round pick. This is one of the five best defensive linemen in football, by any measure. He’s 26. Other than the fluky broken leg suffered at the end of last season, his health is fine. That injury is the only argument any team could make that Wilkerson is not worth, say, picks in the first and third or fourth round.

7. I think the team that ought to go after Wilkerson is Indianapolis. No question. The Colts have a mediocre lot (Kendall Langford and Arthur Jones) with strong prospect Henry Anderson in their 3-4 defensive end scheme now. If I were GM Ryan Grigson, I’d offer the Jets my first-round and fourth-round picks this year (Nos. 18 and 116 overall) for Wilkerson. The Colts, with $19 million under the cap, have been saving cap room for the Andrew Luck contract. Wilkerson is the kind of special player that is worth performing major salary-cap surgery.

8. I think, scanning the seven-round draft order that the league released last week, this was the strangest note I could find: The Patriots have the 96th overall pick, and then don’t pick again for 100 selections, till the 196th pick … and then have seven of the next 54 picks—numbers 196, 204, 208, 214, 221, 243 and 250. As Mike Reiss of ESPN Boston points out, New England has a heavy roster now, and will use those late picks the way many teams use post-draft free agency, as a substitute for being very active with undrafted free agents. New England also has no problem waiting till the crop thins, the way the Patriots did when cornerback Malcolm Butler was still on the street nine days after the 2014 draft.

9. I think, three weeks out, the only thing I believe about the 2016 draft is the Browns are taking Carson Wentz at number two.
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2022 TOP Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
38,388
Those 5 DB snap percentages are why we'll take a CB long before we take a backup OLB.
 

Mackeyser

Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
14,158
Name
Mack
Another important study about the long-term impact of football
We’re getting weary, understandably, of the flood of information about potential dangers of football, particularly at a young age, as it relates to brain maladies later in life. But I want to call your attention to a study published Thursday in the Journal of Neurotrauma that I find particularly important. A group at Boston University, led by MD/PhD candidate Philip Montenigro, studied 97 men who played youth, high school and college football but who did not play pro football. The group found that in the 93 players, the impact of cumulative head trauma led to later-life depression, cognitive impairment and apathy.

Montenigro assigned a value of cumulative head impact for each season each player played, based on the position played and number of games played per season, and totaled up the number. The higher the value, the more likely a player would be to have problems later in life. The “cumulative head impact index” was calculated through a combination of the football history reported by each player, along with the impact frequency recorded by the fairly new study of “accelerometers,” helmet sensors that have recently begun to record the number and intensity of subconcussive hits to players at different levels of football.

This study was focused more on the subconcussive hits (those that result in significant contact to the helmet but not a concussion-causing blow to the helmet) than concussions. Recent accelerometer studies, according to Montenigro’s study, estimated that high school players average 600 subconcussive hits to the head per season, while college players average 1,000. Then, the 93 players were polled to see about their current mental health. The more subconscussive blows, the study found, the higher chance of a brain-related malady later in life.

That’s not a surprise, and it’s not conclusive, either; 93 players is not an exhaustive study that proves anything beyond a doubt. But it is encouraging that Montenigro and his mentor in the survey, BU’s Robert Stern, were able to quantify that players who took more blows seem more likely to have mental issues down the road.

Talking to Stern on Saturday, he left me with the idea that parents and coaches and even the NFL should be using this study as another brick in the wall, and a cautionary look at cumulative head trauma. “We’re learning just enough now that we’re in the toddlerhood of studying the long-term effect of subconcussive blows,” Stern said. “A good analogy is this: I used to be a Little League coach. It’s been mandated for a while now that kids can’t pitch more than a certain number of pitches per game, per week.

The goal was to prevent that kid from an overuse injury, and everyone agrees that it’s a good idea to try to prevent these overuse injuries. Yet, we don’t do anything about the number of times a head gets hit in football, with the most important part of your body getting jostled, or taking a big blow. You drop Johnny off at youth football practice, and you don’t ever think, ‘I want to know how many times he gets hit in the head.’”

“That is absolutely what this study should be doing—getting people to start thinking about the cumulative effect of these repetitive blows to the head,” said Montenigro. “This research can’t say anything definitive, but it should give parents an idea that repeated blows at an early age, and not just concussions, should be monitored. What’s apparent is that concussions suffered did not predict cognitive impairment. But subconcussive hits did predict cognitive impairment, depression and apathy.”

This may be the single most important and relevant thing Peter King has ever published.
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #5
This may be the single most important and relevant thing Peter King has ever published.

It won't stop athletes from playing and it won't stop spectators from watching them play. There are risks in every sport and in other occupations as well. The good thing about these studies is that it gives young people an honest assessment of the risks so they can make an educated choice.
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
29,454
I miss DR Z. and his flaming "Red Head" wife references....I really liked his sense of humor, even when I disagreesd with him..
 

Mackeyser

Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
14,158
Name
Mack
True enough. Then again, it may revitalize baseball as parents in wealthier areas simply decide to not risk their kids and with the longevity of careers in baseball v football, a case can be made for trying to go that route.

Heck, I've heard more than one football player outright say that if given a choice, he'd want his kid to play baseball and a large part of that was just about the money. Couple that with the nascent and burgeoning neuroscience surrounding subconcussive impacts as well as cumulative concussions and there's a compelling case for a number of things:

a) limiting the number of snaps for lineman in Pop Warner no different than a pitch count in little league. I would think that the limit should extend to Varsity. Once a player makes Varsity, the limit is waived as long as they are a Junior or above. I mean a Sophomore at 250 playing guard is still usually a 15 or 16 year old kid with a 15 or 16 year old brain. No getting around that.
b) requiring proper fitting helmets (some youth vids have kids in helmets flopping around so badly, the helmet would serve nothing other than prevent the penetration of a fast moving sharp object. Badly fitting helmets in some cases can be worse for the neck and aren't much better for the head). The NFL AND NCAA should step up and offer scholarships if they want the sport to continue to grow.
c) radical helmet design change. At some point we have to realize that the issue is deceleration and load. I saw one radical design that combined the helmet with the shoulder pads such that certain impacts offloaded the impact into the pads. Most of those would seem to do much better against subconcussive impacts. Still, with the helmet anchored to the pads, a side helmet impact, say wouldn't whip a guys head like he took a right cross, but rather, move his whole body and move a significant portion of the force along the pads to the body. Thus, the amount of acceleration and deceleration experienced immediately at the point of impact becomes significantly reduced. Now, it means straps on the helmet. Guys can't just whip their helmets off. I'm CERTAIN guys wouldn't like that...at first. Not saying that's the definitive way to go, but I dunno that this issue is solved with rule changes.
d) full time officials. Full time officials can spend all off season working on uniformly enforcing the complex rules of a complex game. We should NEVER see an obvious spearing like what happened to Nick Foles go uncalled. We should NEVER see an official tell the trainer to leave the field after tending to an obviously concussed player like what happened to Case Keenum. NEVER. Part time officials have FULL LIVES outside of football and God Bless them. This multi-billion dollar game has full time needs and has multi-million dollar careers on the line.

Bunch of things can and need to happen.

This problem is trouble. One thing I learned is Never ask for trouble. You always get more than you asked for...
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
21,605
Will we ever see a MMQB that does not include Peter King trying to tell us how great the Patriots really are?

This time around he supposes that they are so skilled at finding great players that they waited nine days after the draft to sign Malcolm Butler. My answer to that is if they knew he would be that good, then they would ha e drafted him in round 2. And if King would take his face out of Beli hicks ass long enough to do some research, he would see that a few teams each year get lucky and a UDFA develops into a good, sometimes great player. The Rams had one of the best in LB London Fletcher. Did Patriot King write about how great the Rams were for that find?