NFL Rules Are Just Suggestions

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,218
Name
Burger man

NFL Rules Are Just Suggestions

Tom Brady was watching Titans-Jaguars Thursday night and, like every other person with functional eyes, did not enjoy the experience. Only he overcame his revulsion and fear of being found out, tweeting about it and saying all the holding penalties were ruining his fun.

Two days later, Al Riveron, the National Football League’s designated human shield interpreting both the officials and the drunk Jackson Pollock painting the league calls its rulebook, called his small platoon of refereesand said, “Okay, we have to knock off calling the thing we told you to call three weeks ago.” And good soldiers that they are, the officials did that, lowering the number of Sunday holding calls by nearly half.

This suggests one of two things:

(1) Tom Brady is the actual commissioner of football and may as well get Roger Goodell’s paycheck while the Ginger Avenger gets sent to a $55 million-and-over retirement community in upstate New York to kick up his feet and laugh at the next miserable bastard who has to take Jerry Jones’s 3 a.m. calls.

(2) The NFL is just making this up as it goes along and actually has no rules at all, but suggestions that come and go at a whim because the people in charge of presenting football don’t understand football at all.

I desperately want it to be (1) because of the face Bill Belichick will make the first time he is asked about Brady as his boss. Galaxies will implode with the force of his expression of disgust.

Sadly, though, the true answer is (2). The NFL changes rules every year; that we know, because we laugh at their inability to keep up with their most diabolical coaches. They’ve tried and failed with lowering the head, roughing the passer, and illegal contact before that. But de-emphasizing “points of emphasis” after two weeks, and doing it with a simple conference call a day before a full round of games is the real inside look at how the league works. The NFL, as it turns out, is the shrugging stick figure emoji with expensive suits, with a nuclear fueled ATM attached.

And no, it really doesn’t matter at this point whether de-emphasizing the lobster block prohibition made for better or worse games. It’s that the league has no earthly idea what is or isn’t watchable athletic entertainment is any more, and changes ideas on the fly because it only took two weeks for their alleged good intentions to be mocked and spat upon by smarter and more cunning entrepreneurs with whistles.

Here’s the process: League changes rule, or offers a new POE (point of emphasis) applied to an old or slightly modified rule. Coaches read rule/POE, immediately start imagining ways to circumvent or neuter rule/POE. Strategies are applied. Games become shambolic. High-powered quarterback tweets out his revulsion. League abandons plan in frustration.

It is to the business’s credit that it can convince football fans that this is actually a good thing. Being flexible in the face of failure, fixing problems on the fly and trying to serve the audience above all other conditions—it’s a brilliant bit of spin, no question, and the number of people upon whom that spin works is truly staggering.

But it also proves yet again that football is really just the art of throwing stuff against the wall, studying the spatter pattern, and then getting rid of the stuff it brought for throwing. When John Elway shamed Denver tackle Garett Bolles for his high number of holding penalties with the inspirational pep talk, “Does he know what holding is? Does he know what he can and can’t do?” it turned out that the answer was, “No more or less than the people who wrote the rule in the first place.” Put another way, does Bolles get dispensation for violating a rule the league’s rulemakers clearly didn’t understand and essentially abandoned two weeks later?

Maybe acknowledging a screw-up is noble, but the people who couldn’t navigate the arcaneries of a “catch” and are spectacularly cavalier about the concussion protocol shouldn’t get a lot of lead here. It’s far more likely that they simply don’t know what the hell they’re doing and have a work philosophy of “We’ll just wait until someone yells at us.”

But at least with this latest example, they know who’s doing the yelling, and who got the job of fixing the problem done. And Sunday in Buffalo, I fully expect the referee to ask at one point, “So you good with that call?” And Tom Brady will nod silently. I mean, why wait for Al Riveron’s two cents when the boss is right there?
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
33,961
Name
Stu
Love it. I realize it's Deadspin but it has a lot of accurate points IMO.
 

coconut

Pro Bowler
Joined
Dec 15, 2018
Messages
1,680
Name
coconut
The officials have always been Brady's strength. Now with only his mouth he has shot an arrow into his Achilles heel.
 

Angry Ram

Captain RAmerica Original Rammer
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Messages
17,905
Think the writer just wanted to use all the big buzzwords he knows to make his claims seem legitimate.

Holding is the biggest judgement call ever. Just play and just win. Yeesh.
 

HE WITH HORNS

Hall of Fame
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
3,849
First of all Fuck Tom Brady.

But he is right on this issue, too many penalties make the game unwatchable.
 

RamBall

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
5,554
Name
Dave
First of all Fuck Tom Brady.

But he is right on this issue, too many penalties make the game unwatchable.
To few calls make the holding of AD unwatchable. I would rather see the rules enforced and players learn to play within said rules than watch AD get held on every play and never get the call.
 

HE WITH HORNS

Hall of Fame
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
3,849
To few calls make the holding of AD unwatchable. I would rather see the rules enforced and players learn to play within said rules than watch AD get held on every play and never get the call.

I'm not saying to never call holding if it is blatant or obvious. But there is plenty of holding in the NFL, by telling the refs to call MORE penalties, it ruins the game.
 

LARAMSinFeb.

Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Messages
4,458
I'm not saying to never call holding if it is blatant or obvious. But there is plenty of holding in the NFL, by telling the refs to call MORE penalties, it ruins the game.

Well hopefully there won't be more penalties if linemen adjust to getting called. And AD will have even more sacks.....
 

RamBall

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
5,554
Name
Dave
I'm not saying to never call holding if it is blatant or obvious. But there is plenty of holding in the NFL, by telling the refs to call MORE penalties, it ruins the game.
Why is it the officials fault for ruining the game? Wouldnt it be the players fault for breaking the rules? If the rules were enforced the way they are written, players will adjust. If the officials just decide to quit calling the penalties because fans believe it ruins the game, that would ruin the game.
 

HE WITH HORNS

Hall of Fame
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
3,849
Why is it the officials fault for ruining the game? Wouldnt it be the players fault for breaking the rules? If the rules were enforced the way they are written, players will adjust. If the officials just decide to quit calling the penalties because fans believe it ruins the game, that would ruin the game.

The officials are just doing what they are paid to do. It's up to the NFL to have a watchable product. If they think it makes the game better by having a penalty on almost every single play, then they are wrong.
 

RamBall

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
5,554
Name
Dave
The officials are just doing what they are paid to do. It's up to the NFL to have a watchable product. If they think it makes the game better by having a penalty on almost every single play, then they are wrong.
The players will adjust if they know they will be flagged for holding. Although less holding would result in more QB injuries which would water down the product on the field. Its the officials job to enforce the rules and the players job to play within the rules, so it is the players fault if people think there are too many flags thrown. Maybe they can just be consistent and call holding the same for both teams.
 

Steve808

Pro Bowler
Joined
Nov 27, 2017
Messages
1,709
Name
Steve
If Brady played in the days of Deacon Jones, he would have been broken and out of the league at the age of 27.

The NFL made rules to favor Brady. I have no doubt about it. Some of the hits Goff and the QBs the with no penalty would have the field littered with yellow if the same hit was made on Brady.

How the F do you change a ruling of fumble on the field and change the call to "tuck rule"? The Rams would have trashed the Raiders in the SB because the Raiders don't cheat.