More Pistol, Less I Formation

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

leoram

LA/St Louis/LA fan
Joined
May 25, 2013
Messages
1,291
I couldn't find anything that shows the percentage of formation types the Rams used last year and I would welcome someone doing so if it's possible.

With that said, I wonder if the Rams will try to change Goff into more of a QB under center to compliment a traditional running attack (single back set or I formation) or if it would be wise to utilize more of a pistol type offense like Jared is accustomed to running?

While it's obvious both will be employed, I'm curious what my ROD brothers think should be the heavier focus?

I believe most RB's would prefer having a FB lead blocker escorting him through a hole in a smashmouth fashion and QB's are better protected on early downs working the play action game with a couple reads. The Rams have set up some deep passes to Britt in this manner and worked the Jet Sweep w Austin productively as well.

But Jared Goff has played for years almost exclusively out of shotgun or pistol sets. Gurley did plenty of that for the Georgia Bulldogs so it's not like he can't find success doing so in the NFL. Wouldn't it be wiser to build the offense around player strengths rather than change the players to fit the scheme?

Mike Groh may be the key to the answer to my question. He has learned how to coordinate passing games under some impressive names including Trestman and Gase (who interestingly learned much from his time w Mike Martz). While Groh's addition may have a greater impact on the route concepts of the receivers, I predict we will see more pistol formation development coming to this team.
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
I would like to see the Rams mix in a few of those two-back sets, and I- Formations just to keep opposing Defenses honest!(y);)
Showin your age Dave.....I don't think I've seen ANY team throw outta split backs in years....
 

DaveFan'51

Old-Timer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 18, 2014
Messages
18,666
Name
Dave
Showin your age Dave.....I don't think I've seen ANY team throw outta split backs in years....
Yah, But wouldn't it be Fun!!!(y):D Teams would go "WTF!?!" and Bam we hit them with something Wild!:snicker::shades:
 

Merlin

Enjoying the ride
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
37,216
Key is Gurley. Does he prefer a straight lineup to the LOS or can he read blocking equally well from the offset in pistol. Lot of backs are much better in conventional formations.

If he doesn't mind then by all means use the F out of it.

IMO if the Rams are smart they will run a lot of gun on third and longs though. Goff is so quick at scanning and dishing the ball that play action is not gonna be required on obvious passing downs.
 

den-the-coach

Fifty-four Forty or Fight
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
22,459
Name
Dennis
Goff will be fine with the adjustment, smart teachable kid with a photographic memory, you can't go wrong.
 

blackbart

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
6,225
Name
Tim
Personally I don't think they should limit themselves. I think they should have packages that work both run and pass plays from multiple sets. The rest of the team has the base from last year, Goff needs to adjust and then mix in a few other things too.
 

Orchid

Starter
Joined
Jul 28, 2014
Messages
742
Name
Obert
Do you have a breakdown of how many of the lone setback snaps were under center as opposed to away from center?

These stats are just for passing plays. As it lists plays from the shotgun (QB not under center) seperatly, The lone setback probably means the QB is under center.