MMQB: Peter King - 2/8/16

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
These are only excerpts from this article. To read the whole thing click the link below.
**********************************************************************
http://mmqb.si.com/mmqb/2016/02/07/super-bowl-50-broncos-panthers-peyton-manning-peter-king

A Super Bowl Sunset
In the twilight of his career, Peyton Manning wasn't the man in Denver’s Super Bowl 50 win, but he didn't need to be. The defense dismantled the Panthers, which left the Broncos QB ‘at peace’ as he weighs retirement. Plus an inside look at the Hall of Fame vote and more from Santa Clara
By Peter King

SANTA CLARA, Calif. — On Thursday, three days before the winningest quarterback in NFL history would play The Last Game (or at least the game we’re sure is the last one), he lined up his offense around the defensive 20-yard line and barked out signals. This would be the last full series of plays in the Super Bowl 50 practice week for Denver at Stanford Stadium, their home for the week … and maybe the last full series of practice plays in Peyton Manning’s life.

The sun was nearly touching the top of the west stands of the stadium on this beautiful California winter afternoon, creating an image of a sunset and lengthening shadows on the field as Manning directed traffic.

“Be alert! Be alert!” he called out, motioning Emmanuel Sanders across the formation. And Manning shouted out the play, which began with “Z Motion!” And then the snap, and then … nothing. No one open.

“One more time!” Manning yelled, annoyed. “Do it again!”

And the offense did, Sanders trolling the back of the end zone and Manning hitting him for a touchdown.

Manning completed 24 of 28 passes against the scout team defense on this temperate afternoon, and his coach, Gary Kubiak, said afterward that this was as good as the 39-year-old Manning had looked all season. Around the Broncos as the week aged, there was growing confidence that Manning could once more have a Manning-of-2013 game.

And then he didn’t.

And then the Broncos won the Super Bowl. By 14.

And then Manning, in the bowels of Levi’s Stadium on Sunday night, was fine with being along for the ride, almost a 2000 Dilfer, on a team with the best defense in the league that absolutely pummeled Cam Newton.

“I’ve just had a real peace this year,” Manning told me 90 minutes after the 24-10 win over the Panthers. “I didn’t know how it was going to work out. I didn’t know what was going to happen. But I’m at the point … I’m okay with that.”

* * *
mmqb-manning-peyton-sb50-lombo.jpg

Photo: Patrick Smith/Getty Images
Manning is the first starting quarterback to win a Super Bowl with two different teams.

It must be daunting, and it must be a relief, to go from winning like Clayton Kershaw to winning like Mark Buehrle. To be utterly dominant, and then to be along for the ride on a team that hits four home runs every night. The way the Blue Jays pummeled the ball late last season is the way the Broncos’ defense pummeled Ben Roethlisberger, Tom Brady and Cam Newton in their great playoff run. Denver has a great defense. Holding Big Ben to 16 points, Brady to 18 and MVP Newton to 10? Holding the Steelers, Patriots and Panthers to four touchdowns in 12 quarters? Carolina, New England and Pittsburgh were 1-3-4 in the league in scoring, yet managed all of seven third-down conversions in three games.

Von Miller is the star of this team. He and DeMarcus Ware and two young defensive linemen (Malik Jackson and Derek Wolfe), and a couple of swift linebackers and a strong and physical secondary. Manning can complete 13 of 23 for 141 yards, with two turnovers and a 56.6 rating, and the Broncos can still be the ’85 Bears.

“This is a game Peyton never would have dreamed of playing 10, 12 years ago,” his old coach, Tony Dungy, said Sunday night. “But when you win the Super Bowl, you’re fine with it.”

My theory is Manning, while rehabbing his heel and lifting and getting stronger in the 48 days he was out of the Denver lineup, looked around and realized he didn’t have to throw for 250 anymore for his team to have a chance to win. That was most of the time in Indianapolis, and much of his first two years in Denver. Just don’t make the big mistake, he must be thinking. Punts can be your friends. “I’m buying your theory,” father Archie Manning said Saturday. “I really think he’s fine with it. Look at him. He’s happy. He’s peaceful. I think you have to put this in some perspective. He had four neck surgeries [in 2010 and 2011]. He might never have played again. But playing again, and playing well when he came back—what a blessing.”

But in December, when the rehab was slow and the Broncos were struggling on offense, losing to Oakland and Pittsburgh in succession, Kubiak still was convinced the team was good enough to overcome not knowing if or when Manning would play. “There can still be a fairy-tale ending to this season,” he confided to a friend in December.

And there was, of course. Manning returned to play the second half of the final game, then as a complementary player in both the Pittsburgh and New England wins, all the while having the free world think he was retiring at the end of the year. Which he likely will do. But after talking to Dungy nine days ago, Manning felt convinced he needed to let this moment live without infecting it with the so-called Disease of Me.

“I called him,” said Dungy, “and I said, ‘I don’t know what you’re going to do, but if you haven’t decided yet, don’t decide now. Don’t decide at halftime of the last game, or five minutes after the last game. Don’t do it in the moment.’ I think Dick Vermeil made that decision in the moment, and he regretted it. I said, ‘Let the adrenalin wear off and then decide.’”

As Manning said Sunday night, “I thought that was some good advice, to take some time and get away. Coach said, ‘Promise me you’ll do that. It felt like I was back in Indy and he was telling me, ‘Hey, be smart with this ball on third down.’ So it was good advice and I’m going to take some time. But like I said, I have a peace about it either way.”

* * *

mmqb-manning-anderson.jpg

Photo: Al Bello/Getty Images

On Saturday night, Kubiak asked captains Manning and Ware to speak to the team. Ware took a religious tone. “When you walk into the valley of the shadow of death,” Ware said, “you’re not alone.” And he showed images of the offense, the defense and the special teams on the big screen, to emphasize the team aspect of the coming day. Manning did it differently.

He talked about the people in the organization, the unsung people they wouldn’t know, or know well. He quoted a favorite pastime of Kubiak’s, the coach’s preference to use “Wise Words” through the year to pass along a lesson. “One of my favorites,” Manning said, “is, ‘Life is fair. Keep working.’” Quarterback coach Greg Knapp said it was the best team-unifying speech he’s heard from a player in his years in football.

“We were ready to play last night,” tight end Owen Daniels said Sunday.

During the day Sunday, when Kubiak saw Manning at the team hotel, he said: “How’d you sleep?”

Manning said, “Like a baby. Ten-and-a-half hours.” Much longer than usual.

Whoa. Maybe the man really was at peace. The game was, in many ways, 1966 football. Quarterbacks playing inefficiently, at least in part because of the ceaseless pressure from both defenses. And it came down to, at the end of the game, Denver trying to play keepaway in a six-point game (Denver, 16-10) the same way the Broncos tried to play keepaway in an eight-point game (Denver, 20-12) in the AFC title game against New England.

Third-and-nine, Denver 26, 5:42 left. Surely Manning would try to convert through the air. No sir. “I thought I saw him change the play to a run,” said Dungy. And Manning did. C.J. Anderson, gain of two. Punt. An incompletion would have taken maybe seven seconds off the clock here. The two-yard run took 43 seconds off. Britton Colquitt punted.

Manning was playing four-corners. He didn’t care. He had Von Miller to strip-sack Newton for the second time moments later, and Anderson scored the clinching touchdown, and Peyton Manning won a Super Bowl without throwing a touchdown pass. He went 3-0 in the postseason and didn’t throw for a touchdown in two of the three wins.

But he has his second Super Bowl title now. And in a day or two, he’ll get away, somewhere no one will find him and his family, and he’ll figure out what to do with his life. At least for now.

“I haven’t decided yet,” Manning said—and he has to know a nation eye-rolls at that. Everyone thinks he’s riding off into the sunset the way Bettis and Strahan and, yes, Elway, have done in the past two decades.

“Ashley and I, we’ll have that talk at some point, but we are going to enjoy this tonight and celebrate. Our kids are four and they are in Pre-K and the teachers say, you really shouldn’t pull them out of school. We are pulling them out! We are going somewhere and we are going to get the heck out of town.

“I have one thing I’ll say, I’ve had good experience with making some decisions, choosing where to go to college, staying for my senior year in college and deciding which NFL team to play for in free agency four years ago. I’ve taken time on all those, I’ve prayed about it, I’ve talked to some people about it and I think I will do that with this. But I have a peace about it whichever way it goes. I’m glad I have been able to get through these two weeks with the focus staying on the team, because that is what it has been about this year. I’ve been a part of it.

“Do you know deep down inside what you are going to do?” I said.

“I don’t,” he said.

But if this is it, and assuming it is, this has been the kind of year Manning has never come close to experiencing as one of the best players ever. Yanked from the lineup. Hurt in midseason. A backup when he returned. Coming back to win a Super Bowl.

“Somebody could say, this year, you really did everything as a QB,” Manning said, sounding wistful. The bus was waiting on him, and he could feel the world waiting for him. For once, he didn’t seem to care.

“I hadn’t been a backup, hadn’t really been injured. I played a long time, but I’d only seen it from one way. I know there are a couple scenarios that I haven’t been in, but I covered a lot of bases this year. Like I said, there is a real perspective to that. And it was really sort of educational for me. You know nobody loves the quarterback position more than me. Today, with the 50th Super Bowl and the league bringing back all the MVPs, I saw Phil Simms and I saw Joe Montana and Steve Young out there on the field before the game.

I wanted so badly to find a way to be out there for that MVP picture out there with Eli [his brother] and Tom Brady and Joe Namath. Impossible. There was no way I could do it. But nobody loves quarterbacks more than me and I think I have an even greater perspective and appreciation for the position after this year and I’ve stuck with it. You find out a lot. And it certainly ended up in a real good way today, didn’t it?”

It did. For 53 Broncos and a coaching staff and an organization. An egalitarian Super Bowl, with the quarterback in twilight a part. And the smile on his face, the wide, wide smile, told the story. He was fine with being one of 53, winning a different way. It felt as good.

* * *

mmqb-davis-terrell.jpg

Photo: Mark Leffingwell/Getty Images
Terrell Davis didn't make the cut Saturday, but the former Broncos running back will have more shots at being voted into the Hall of Fame.

On the 2016 Pro Football Hall of Fame class

My 25th time as a selector was one of the most interesting meetings I’ve experienced. I left the convention center ballroom Saturday afternoon in San Francisco convinced this year’s vetting process was fair to everyone in the room (though Broncos fans surely will not agree). I’ll explain as I tip-toe around some conclusions I drew from the meeting of 46 Hall of Fame selectors and some explanation of why some things happened the way they did. A point of order on why I say I have to tip-toe in this discussion: Voters are required to keep the details of all discussions about candidates in the room and not disclose who said what about whom. So I’ll tell you as much as I’m allowed.

First, understand that just as all politics are local, all Hall of Fame arguments are local. I heard from Joe Jacoby supporters angry that the former Hog didn’t make it, from Terrell Owens backers outraged about him not getting in, from Terrell Davis fans ticked off that he got left out. Part of what makes sports fun to watch and follow are the passions that Hall of Fame debates inspire. But just do this: Take the 15 modern-era finalists this year, and cut out 10. I ask you to do this exercise because that’s what the 46 Hall voters have to do in one long meeting the day before the Super Bowl.

A maximum of five of the 15 modern-era finalists can make the Hall in a year. Here’s the 15: Morten Andersen, Steve Atwater, Don Coryell, Terrell Davis, Tony Dungy, Alan Faneca, Brett Favre, Kevin Greene, Marvin Harrison, Joe Jacoby, Edgerrin James, John Lynch, Terrell Owens, Orlando Pace, Kurt Warner. Erase 10. Or 11 or 12. This year, it was basically 14 men for a max of four spots, with Favre being the lock of the group. Point is, you've got to get rid of 10 of those 15 … and this, to me, was not an overly strong year for candidates compared to others.

A few observations:

• Terrell Davis is going to make the Hall of Fame. I never thought that before Saturday. But I do now. I don’t know when it will happen, but the events of Saturday convinced me he’ll eventually make Canton. The cases for and against Davis are pretty simple.

For: He had three intergalactic seasons, and he was one of the best playoff performers ever—seven post-season games, seven 100-plus-yard rushing games. That is unmatched in football history. Add a fourth year in which he rushed for 1,117 yards, and you’ve got a superb start to a career, one of the best ever. But at 26 he suffered a knee injury that doomed his career, and he was out of football by 29.

Against: Should a player with three fantastic years and another good one make the Hall? That’s really what the Davis case comes down to—plus the lesser fact that the Broncos of the post-Davis era had three rushers run for 1,500 yards or more in 2000, 2002 and 2003. (Regarding the “Gale Sayers-had-a-short-career-too” argument: Sayers’ career began 51 years ago, and lots of players between 1940 and 1970 had short careers, because of things like military service, low pay for football players and medical science not being able to fix knees. So it’s not an apples-to-apples comparison.)

Now, in the room we’re asked to listen to the cases for the candidates, then cull the 15 candidates down to 10 in a secret ballot; after that, we’re told the 10 top vote-getters, and we have to vote for five in another private ballot. I voted for Davis in the cutdown from 15 to 10. I did not vote for him in the cutdown from 10 to five. But I was sorely tempted to do so. I have always felt longevity has to be a part of a modern player’s greatness. I still do.

But I thought very hard (and did so in the weeks leading up to the meeting) whether Davis is the kind of outlier who should sway me. In the end, I just thought there were five better candidates, using all considerations, including greatness and influence on the game and longevity. But after hearing the 24-minute debate, I believe the longevity factor will eventually be overcome—2017? 2018?—and he’ll make it.

• My ballots. On the cut to 10, I voted for Davis, Dungy, Favre, Greene, Harrison, Jacoby, Lynch, Owens, Pace, Warner … On the cut to five, I voted for Dungy, Favre, Greene, Harrison and Pace … On the yes-or-no vote on the final five, I voted yes on Dungy, Favre, Green, Harrison and Pace … The other three nominees—Seniors nominees Ken Stabler and Dick Stanfel, and Contributors nominee Eddie DeBartolo Jr.—all got yes votes from me. (The Seniors and Contributors candidates are simply yes or no votes; they are not competing against anyone.)

• The call on the Niners owner. DeBartolo is a tough call. I had leaned against him previously (though not adamantly) because of a salary-cap violation by the Niners and his season suspension for his involvement in a Louisiana bribery incident independent of the 49ers. My belief, after two important interviews last week, is that those incidents should be significant factors in the consideration but not knockout blows, particularly since I believe DeBartolo had no knowledge of the cap violations when they happened. (However, he’s ultimately responsible as owner of the team.

I’m just telling you I believe he was working full time on the Louisiana charges at the time and was not the one who committed the violations.) The pros for DeBartolo, essentially, involve the kind of owner he was and how much the Niners won. In the 32 years I’ve covered the NFL, I haven’t seen an owner as beloved by his players, and I haven’t seen an owner that players on other teams wanted to play for more. Aside from the strike year in 1982, DeBartolo oversaw 17 double-digit-win seasons in a row, 16 of them playoff years. After Bill Walsh’s fourth year as coach, a disappointing 3-6 strike year, Walsh told DeBartolo he wanted to quit as coach and become GM, and hire Terry Donahue to coach. DeBartolo told Walsh, “Your value to the franchise is in coaching.”

He strongly implied that if Walsh wanted to go upstairs, DeBartolo would part ways with him. So Walsh stayed—and set the stage for three Super Bowls in the next seven years. I think you look at DeBartolo’s complete picture, warts and all, and he more than passes the test for an owner who belongs in Canton.

• Why Dungy? In fairness, I have worked with Tony Dungy for several years at NBC, so I see why you’d find me partial to him. I can’t do anything about that, other than to say I do my best to keep my personal feelings for any candidates out of my deliberations. So … many don’t understand why Dungy—22nd on the all-time wins list, with a 9-10 playoff record and one Super Bowl victory—is making the Hall. A few numbers help the argument: He’s the only coach ever to take teams to the playoffs 10 straight years; his 10.7 wins per year is best in NFL history.

He and Bill Belichick are the only coaches ever to have a run of six straight seasons of 12 wins or better. His post-season record? Meh. But in my opinion, Dungy has to be credited with doing the most for African-American coaches of anyone who’s ever roamed an NFL sideline. I see it often in my observations at NBC, as he advises risers or fallers in the business by cell phone on Sundays. And you can’t underestimate the impact of Dungy being the first African-American coach to win a Super Bowl. It’s a layered case that Dungy makes, and I think he’s deserving.

* * *

The Weekly Awards

OFFENSIVE PLAYER OF THE WEEK

Britton Colquitt, punter, Denver. I have been doing this column for 19 NFL seasons, and I feel quite sure I have never named a punter the Offensive Player of the Week. And here I’m doing it in a Super Bowl. But on a day when the Broncos gained 194 yards—an amazingly low 130 in the final 55 minutes of the game—and converted one of 14 third downs, the only way they had a chance to win was by controlling the ball. That starts with a punter who directionally kept the ball away from the dangerous Ted Ginn Jr. Colquitt was brilliant at it. Ginn had two return yards. Two. For the game, Colquitt punted eight times for an average of 45.9 yards, and a net average of 45.6. Eight of Carolina’s 16 drives started inside the Panther 20; another five between the 20 and 30. A great game on the big stage for a very good punter.

DEFENSIVE PLAYERS OF THE WEEK

Von Miller, outside linebacker, Denver. The Broncos defense is the main reason the franchise now possesses its third Lombardi Trophy, and Miller was the catalyst. Miller made the two biggest plays of the game, stripping Cam Newton twice, one turning into a defensive touchdown and the other essentially ending the Panthers’ night. Miller deserved the MVP and now he deserves to be paid in J.J. Watt’s league: $20 million-plus per season.

Kony Ealy, defensive end, Carolina. What a game to have a coming out party. Ealy, a 2014 second-round pick out of Missouri, was the best player for the Panthers and would have had a strong case for MVP had Carolina won. Ealy had three sacks, a forced fumble and a skillful interception of Manning. Carolina’s defense already was full of game-changers and another one emerged in Super Bowl 50.

COACH OF THE WEEK

Wade Phillips, defensive coordinator, Denver. The man just might retire this award. What a postseason Phillips had, his defense holding Pittsburgh, New England and Carolina to an average of 12.7 points a game. He once again put together a brilliant game plan. Cam Newton never have the kind of open rush lanes he always seems to find five or six times a game. Phillips blitzed the safeties a little, but mostly relied on his great players on the defensive front to get home—which they did. Seven sacks. Six, of a quarterback who takes such great pride in not taking sacks, and a seventh after nailing Ted Ginn behind the line when he was in option-pass mode. “There’s the man,” said Malik Jackson, pointing admiringly to Phillips after the game. “What a game he coached.” We saw.

SPECIAL TEAMS PLAYERS OF THE WEEK

Jordan Norwood, wide receiver/punt-returner, Denver. Incredible that in 50 Super Bowls, there’s never been a punt return for touchdown. Midway through the second quarter, Norwood play-acted like he was going to call for a fair catch, except he never signaled for one. Instead, he caught it at the Denver 25, ran right, turned upfield, and got dragged down at the Carolina 14-yard line. Norwood’s 61-yard return is a Super Bowl record and it led to a Brandon McManus field goal, and a 13-7 halftime lead for Denver.

Brandon McManus, kicker, Denver. Capping a perfect postseason, McManus booted field goals of 34, 33 and 30 yards, while counterpart Graham Gano missed from 44 before hitting from 39. That’s a 9-3 kicker edge for Denver, and in a game with every possession counting in a big way, a 9-3 edge is a winning edge. For the postseason, McManus was 10 for 10 on field goals.

GOAT OF THE WEEK

Mike Remmers, right tackle, Carolina. The man who had the unenviable task of blocking Von Miller on Sunday night did not fare well. Remmers was unable to slow Miller on two game-altering plays—the first-quarter strip-sack that resulted in a Broncos touchdown and a fourth-quarter strip-sack that all but ended the Panthers’ hopes. Remmers was not alone in his goat-ness, as the rest of Carolina’s front also was overmatched by Denver’s defense, which finished with seven sacks.

* * *

Ten Things I Think I Think

1. I think this is what I liked about Super Bowl 50:

a. Steph Curry, wearing a Panthers number 30 jersey, banging the Carolina drum (a Panther tradition) before the game—Curry right in his own northern California backyard.

b. Very classy move by last season’s NFL Man of the Year, Thomas Davis, coming over pre-game to congratulate this year’s NFL Man of the Year, Anquan Boldin, on the field.

c. The anthem. Had to go back and watch it on YouTube because it was muffled in the press box, but Gaga nailed it.

d. Neil Hornsby. The Pro Football Focus founder wrote for The MMQBprior to the game that the key matchup would be Carolina right tackle Mike Remmers versus Denver pass-rusher Von Miller. “I feel the eventual winner of this [game] is likely to be the same as the winner of Remmers vs. Miller.” Well, Miller went around Remmers on the first touchdown of the game, slamming Cam Newton and forcing the sack-touchdown that Malik Jackson recovered for a touchdown. Good call by Hornsby.

e. Darian Stewart, the Denver safety, stripping Mike Tolbert and forcing a turnover. Stewart ($2.25 million in salary and bonuses this year) was a pretty smart signing by John Elway.

f. Terrific one-handed pick of Manning by Kony Ealy.

g. Prescient call by Jim Nantz on the CBS telecast, saying there had been 227 punts in Super Bowl history without ever having one returned for a touchdown … a few minutes later, Norwood broke a 61-yarder. Not a touchdown, but almost.

h. What a catch, Devin Funchess.

i. I love sheep singing. Who doesn’t? I looked up at one point in the third quarter, and there was some commercial with sheep singing “Somebody to Love,” by Queen.

j. Center Matt Paradis, for his block on Luke Kuechly that freed C.J. Anderson for a nice gain, one of the few times all night (maybe all career) that Kuechly got blocked.

k. Kuechly, and Thomas Davis. They are threats on every defensive snap.

l. Kawann Short and Star Lotulelei, for being the kind of run-support players that make it so hard for anyone to get momentum in the running game.

m. T.J. Ward: “We didn’t want the happy, fun-spirited, dabbing, dancing Cam. No, we wanted the sulking, upset, talking to my linemen, running backs, I don’t know what’s going on Cam Newton. And that’s what we got.”

n. Now there’s a terrific summation of what the Broncos were trying to do, and what they really did do, to Newton.

o. C.J. Anderson, with 234 post-season rushing yards.

p. Sid Hartman. The great Sid Hartman. The 95-year-old Minnesota sportscasting and sportswriting legend is still doing a Sunday show in the Twin Cities. He’s not traveling much now, but we had a good time Sunday morning talking about the Hall of Fame voting. He was bullish on the elections of Tony Dungy and Eddie DeBartolo.

2. I think this is what I didn’t like about Super Bowl 50:

a. Aqib Talib: three penalties, at a cost of 21 yards to Denver, in the first 19 minutes.

b. Mike Carey’s pronouncement on the very iffy catch by Jerricho Cotchery that was ruled an incompletion in the first quarter. Carolina challenged the call. Carey said: “Good challenge by Carolina … If I was in the [replay] booth, I’d reverse this to a catch.” Of course, the way Carey’s year has gone, Clete Blakeman ruled the ball incomplete. And watching the replay four or five times, the way I saw it, there’s no way I’d have reversed the call on the field. Just not enough evidence.

c. Ron Rivera’s challenge early in the second quarter over seven yards of turf. He chose to challenge a play not ruled a sack by Kony Ealy, and if he was right, the Broncos would have had a second-and-17 instead of second-and-10. Regardless whether he was right or wrong, it was his last challenge of the game. Carolina didn’t have a challenge available for the last 41 minutes of the game. No way I’d have used my last challenge over a seven-yard difference in field position.

d. Manning’s first pick—and first turnover—after 145 efficient post-season minutes, not seeing Kony Ealy quickly enough as he tried to muscle a ball to Jordan Norwood. This bad error by Manning erased the Broncos’ chances to build a 16-7 halftime lead—or better. Absolutely cannot make that throw. Manning got lucky on a dropped pick early in the game too.

e. Terrible late-first-half clock management by Carolina, wasting 13 seconds in the final minute instead of being crisp and getting to the line and sprinting through a couple of plays to try to get in field-goal range.

f. Third-down efficiency, in total: four for 29. That is all-time bad third-down converting.

g. Demaryius Thomas. It can be forgotten now, but he was The Invisible Man this postseason. For a jillionaire wideout, these are awful numbers over three games: 7 catches, 60 yards, zero touchdowns.

3. I think the week ended with some confusion over the Rooney-Rule-for-women. The rule will apply only to league office hires at first—not to team executive and front-office hires. The MMQB’sJenny Vrentas checks in on Roger Goodell’s women’s initiative:

Thursday morning in San Francisco, Goodell addressed a ballroom filled primarily with women, and announced a new rule change to help open more doors for women in top roles with the NFL. The rule only means something when the female candidates being interviewed are serious contenders for the job—something that has been a concern with the Rooney Rule over the past 12 years. So the NFL will start by requiring women to be interviewed for all senior positions within the league office; it’s to be determined on positions below that.

“You can see that progress is being made,” Goodell said in his opening remarks for the league's first-ever Women's Summit, held Thursday and Friday mornings of Super Bowl week. “We're going to make that commitment.” The focus of the summit, which included speeches from former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and tennis star Serena Williams, was getting and keeping more women involved in sports. One NFL team executive questioned how well the Rooney Rule will work for women when it hasn't been as effective as hoped for minorities, many of whom still too often hear the questions of whether or not they are Rooney Rule-fulfillers when they interview for top jobs.

But the idea behind these rules is to get women and minorities in front of team decision-makers and highlight candidates who might otherwise be overlooked. Among the jobs women will now have to be interviewed for include executive VP of football ops, COO and, presumably, commissioner. There is no downside to that.


4. I think one little bit of free-agency buzz I heard here is the Broncos won’t be surprised if Browns coach Hue Jackson does more than just sniff around Brock Osweiler. Cleveland is in an interesting spot, picking second in the first round with a cadre of interesting but not lock college quarterbacks on the board. They’re surely not prepared to know what they’ll do a month from now in free-agency, but if Jackson is shaky on Jared Goff and Paxton Lynch and Carson Wentz, maybe Cleveland will look at a reasonably priced (or so you would think) prospect like Osweiler.

Side note: Denver has three important free agents—Osweiler, who will be earmarked to replace Payton Manning; pass rusher Von Miller, who will be franchise-tagged if John Elway can’t sign him before the start of free agency; and defensive end Malik Jackson, who clearly would be one of the top players on the market if not signed by Denver before the start of the signing period in March.

Jackson is 26, and the Broncos tried to get him signed late in the season but couldn’t come to terms. Instead, Denver signed fellow defensive end Derek Wolfe, also an ascending player, to a four-year, $36-million deal. I could see an end-needy team like the Giants going hard after Jackson if he’s out there.

5. I think I agree with Neil Best of Newsday: Nashville would be one heck of a Super Bowl city.

6. I think this was the idea of the week at the Super Bowl: Roger Goodell said two personal fouls in a game should lead to a player’s ejection. Not sure it should be that cut-and-dried, but the concept is good. I’d want to think about this, because if a pass rusher gets nailed on the first series of the game with a borderline personal foul for hitting the quarterback late, there’s a good chance he would play the rest of the game feeling like he’s got to lay back instead of playing as normal.

But this is an excellent debate for the Competition Committee to have. In a particularly egregious case such as Odell Beckham Jr.’s loss of control and helmet-smash of Josh Norman in the Giants-Panthers game, it would have gotten Beckham thrown out—which would have been justice.

7. I think, Johnny Manziel, your words don’t matter any more. Your words at the 2014 combine and pre-draft convinced the Browns you had turned over a new leaf. Your words after 73 days of rehab last summer tried to convince people your life was finally in a good place. Your nothing-happened-here claims after a highway incident with a girlfriend and admitted day drinking last fall raised lots of eyebrows inside the Browns but again got mostly a pass.

Your silence after going to Las Vegas while inactive on the last weekend of the regular season pushed you off the Browns. (It’s just a formality now.) And your claims last week that you’re focused on football and after another incident with a woman in Texas in which WFAA-TV reports you said, “Shut up or I’ll kill us both,” … This isn’t about football anymore, and won’t be for a while. This has to be about focusing on a life gone way off the tracks, and trying to get the help you need to get it on the tracks.

The fact that your agent, Erik Burkhardt, a good and reputable man, would choose to part ways with you Friday should be the last straw. Get help. “I truly believe if they can’t get him help, he won’t live to see his 24th birthday,” said his father, Paul Manziel, in the Dallas Morning News. Johnny’s 24th birthday: Dec. 6.

8. I think Deion Sanders needed to check the reported facts in the Manziel story before telling Cleveland.com this regarding Manziel: “It’s hard to be a young kid. You have to go through these trials and tribulations to find yourself and that’s what he doing right now. He’s trying to find himself. And I empathize with him. Johnny’s girlfriend. That’s his issue … I’m not saying she is the problem. I’m saying their relationship is inflammatory.” Lord, is that a tone-deaf statement. In the category of Worst Analyst Quote of 2016, that one takes the early lead—and will be hard to beat.
 

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
I think Deion Sanders needed to check the reported facts in the Manziel story before telling Cleveland.com this regarding Manziel: “It’s hard to be a young kid. You have to go through these trials and tribulations to find yourself and that’s what he doing right now. He’s trying to find himself. And I empathize with him. Johnny’s girlfriend. That’s his issue … I’m not saying she is the problem. I’m saying their relationship is inflammatory.” Lord, is that a tone-deaf statement. In the category of Worst Analyst Quote of 2016, that one takes the early lead—and will be hard to beat.
Perhaps I'm still hung over/drunk....what's wrong with what Primetime said?
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #3
Perhaps I'm still hung over/drunk....what's wrong with what Primetime said?

Apparently PK has no patience for young men growing up in the spotlight of the NFL. I agree with him to a point on Manziel because the Browns have tons of money invested him and JM has acted irresponsibly. But he was a bit harsh with Deion.
 

Angry Ram

Captain RAmerica Original Rammer
Joined
Jul 1, 2010
Messages
17,863
b. Mike Carey’s pronouncement on the very iffy catch by Jerricho Cotchery that was ruled an incompletion in the first quarter. Carolina challenged the call. Carey said: “Good challenge by Carolina … If I was in the [replay] booth, I’d reverse this to a catch.” Of course, the way Carey’s year has gone, Clete Blakeman ruled the ball incomplete. And watching the replay four or five times, the way I saw it, there’s no way I’d have reversed the call on the field. Just not enough evidence.

c. Ron Rivera’s challenge early in the second quarter over seven yards of turf. He chose to challenge a play not ruled a sack by Kony Ealy, and if he was right, the Broncos would have had a second-and-17 instead of second-and-10. Regardless whether he was right or wrong, it was his last challenge of the game. Carolina didn’t have a challenge available for the last 41 minutes of the game. No way I’d have used my last challenge over a seven-yard difference in field position.

d. Manning’s first pick—and first turnover—after 145 efficient post-season minutes, not seeing Kony Ealy quickly enough as he tried to muscle a ball to Jordan Norwood. This bad error by Manning erased the Broncos’ chances to build a 16-7 halftime lead—or better. Absolutely cannot make that throw. Manning got lucky on a dropped pick early in the game too.

e. Terrible late-first-half clock management by Carolina, wasting 13 seconds in the final minute instead of being crisp and getting to the line and sprinting through a couple of plays to try to get in field-goal range.

f. Third-down efficiency, in total: four for 29. That is all-time bad third-down converting.

Must be nice sitting in the press box writing all this down. With no pressure whatsoever except getting this article done by Monday morning.

Also, his last point. It's good defense. It's OK to say that.
 

Mackeyser

Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
14,176
Name
Mack
Deion puts Johnny's problems on the GF as if he's a victim, even partially?

No. Johnny needs to take responsibility for his life. If his gf is toxic, he needs to break it off with her, but this is the same mentality that brings out, "I only hit her because she provoked me" BS.

I was raised around an alcoholic, so I have very, very little patience for any blaming.
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #6
I was raised around an alcoholic, so I have very, very little patience for any blaming.

So was I and then became one myself for 7 years so it's like seeing both sides of a very destructive lifestyle. My younger brother's on this site and he can testify to all of it if he so chooses. I went through two marriages in a very short time because of my drinking and insane behavior. There were some who were patient and kind enough to encourage me and point me in the right direction. The rest was up to me.

Manziel's already been to rehab once. That's strike one. I've known people personally though who had to go through that process many times before they straightened out. Others never got it and died.

And yes, there are people who are toxic to alcoholics and drug addicts. They are either enablers or caught up in similar addictions. Some just flat out can piss you off so much and so often you feel like getting loaded. I had to dump many people from my life and get a whole new set of friends. JF will have to do the same if he wants to get through this.

I have empathy for those struggling with addictions but at some point they need to bottom out before they wake up and doing something about it. Addiction is like an elevator ride to the bottom. At each floor you lose more stuff. For Johnny Manziel let's hope he gets the message before he loses his career and then his life.
 

Mackeyser

Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
14,176
Name
Mack
I appreciate your comments and agree with what you say.

I hope and pray that JM gets the help he needs.

My only issue was blaming the gf. Even if she's toxic (which we don't know), she's not responsible for his addiction or his decisions and he'll never make any progress if he's getting support that ANY of this is external.

Worse, it emboldens and enables the victim blamers out there who use moments like this to blame women for the bad acts of men.

That's where the tone deaf part comes in and Peter King is right on about that.
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
15,987
My only issue was blaming the gf. Even if she's toxic (which we don't know)

On face value she looks like a high maintenance skank. Typical gf of a party boy type guy.

.
 

Mackeyser

Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
14,176
Name
Mack
Even if she's all that and more, it serves no one to not insist JM take full responsibility for himself.

Logic dictates that there is dysfunction surrounding JM including his close relationships.

We all know the drill. There is no blame game to be played and JM will have to eventually if he wants to be healthy, seek help and take full responsibility for himself. That may mean extricating himself from those who trigger his addictive behaviors or physically removing himself, whether it be moving out or moving to a different city.

I just know he can never get there as long as he clings to the "the crazy b-tch made me do it" card as if it were real currency.

Please understand I'm not defending the gf because I don't know her. I do know that whatever role she's playing in all this, it ultimately doesn't change anything for JM. Until and unless he can take responsibility for his life and actions, a statement I don't make lightly, the blame will be on him.

And I say that as an addict, gambling in my case. Heck, I've stared at my phone for over an hour debating whether or not I should bet ROD bucks.
 

VegasRam

Give your dog a hug.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
3,829
Name
Doug
I appreciate your comments and agree with what you say.

I hope and pray that JM gets the help he needs.

My only issue was blaming the gf.

Didn't see where he blamed her

Even if she's toxic (which we don't know), she's not responsible for his addiction or his decisions and he'll never make any progress if he's getting support that ANY of this is external.

OK - agreed, obviously and especially if abuse is involved.

Worse, it emboldens and enables the victim blamers out there who use moments like this to blame women for the bad acts of men.

Not sure what a Victim Blamer (we talking JM here, or society?) is but here's the thing - why doesn't she walk?
(Love, commitment, dollar signs - what?)
Didn't see where she was blamed for anything, btw. Women being blamed for the bad acts of men is anathema to women, since they never could have possibly contributed to any of this shit.
Of course they didn't - that being essentially a given in our society at present, and rightly so....maybe.

That's where the tone deaf part comes in and Peter King is right on about that.[/QUOTE

Look - if she loves him and by that, wants to help, then she knows in her heart that she isn't. If she doesn't, then she's just out for a joyride (for lack of a better expression).

People with agendas can often be misconstrued as to their motives in interpreting selected stories to fit their current/ongoing monologue.
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
15,987
.

you beat that addiction? well done.

.
 

Mackeyser

Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
14,176
Name
Mack
The blaming part had to do with Deion Sanders statement. Seemed pretty straight forward to me...and Peter King who reported it. I don't want you to think I think Prime (the poster here) was doing any of that or that I was making any accusation of that kind.

Also, I made sure to not say anything about the gf because I don't know her situation. It could run the gamut from someone in love with an out of control addict to a triggering, enabling, self-serving party-girl with serious issues of her own. I don't have the foggiest idea and rather than give any energy to any of it, I specifically chose to say nothing.

Lastly, I'm not saying that women are blameless in all things. What I was saying is that JM has no one else to blame for his actions and anyone helping him externalize isn't helping him at all. JM has to get real with his addiction(s) and his actions and the damage his actions have caused.

Or... He can do it Deion's way and JM's dad will be sadly right that JM likely won't see his 24th Birthday.
 

Mackeyser

Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
14,176
Name
Mack
.

you beat that addiction? well done.

.

More like caught it early. I was a bookie in Jr High and dabbled in HS and my record picking fights through HS was 108-12. I picked Buster Douglas to beat Tyson three weeks before the fight because I read in The National that Greg Page had knocked out Tyson in sparring and the Tyson camp was trying to say it was a flash knockdown. Uh-uh. Anyway, having grown up in the shadow of Santa Anita racetrack, I remember guys picking up used tickets and how Lady Luck seemed an even more cruel mistress than the Sea. I knew I had the bug and in order to shackle myself, I promised my fiancée when I asked her to marry me (on her 19th birthday) that I wouldn't gamble. Other than $20 in Vegas which she knows about and a few lottery tickets, I've kept that promise.

And, it's not beat by any stretch...

Caged, maybe, but if I turn my back for a second, I could literally lose it all... And that scares the crap out of me. I know I'm blessed to have seen it coming and had the wherewithal to preempt the damage. Just because it's dry on one side of a dam don't mean there's not a whole lotta water on the other side... Unless the dam is in CA, then you're safe...
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
15,987
More like caught it early. I was a bookie in Jr High and dabbled in HS and my record picking fights through HS was 108-12. I picked Buster Douglas to beat Tyson three weeks before the fight because I read in The National that Greg Page had knocked out Tyson in sparring and the Tyson camp was trying to say it was a flash knockdown. Uh-uh. Anyway, having grown up in the shadow of Santa Anita racetrack, I remember guys picking up used tickets and how Lady Luck seemed an even more cruel mistress than the Sea. I knew I had the bug and in order to shackle myself, I promised my fiancée when I asked her to marry me (on her 19th birthday) that I wouldn't gamble. Other than $20 in Vegas which she knows about and a few lottery tickets, I've kept that promise.

And, it's not beat by any stretch...

Caged, maybe, but if I turn my back for a second, I could literally lose it all... And that scares the crap out of me. I know I'm blessed to have seen it coming and had the wherewithal to preempt the damage. Just because it's dry on one side of a dam don't mean there's not a whole lotta water on the other side... Unless the dam is in CA, then you're safe...

Well done again. I'm sure we've all seen lives ruined by the gambling addiction.

.
 

Psycho_X

Legend
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
11,202
The fact that your agent, Erik Burkhardt, a good and reputable man, would choose to part ways with you Friday should be the last straw. Get help. “I truly believe if they can’t get him help, he won’t live to see his 24th birthday,” said his father, Paul Manziel, in the Dallas Morning News. Johnny’s 24th birthday: Dec. 6.

How about you help your own son? Probably too late now but maybe you should have smacked him in the ****ing head once in a while with the silver spoon in his mouth and you wouldn't have raised such a irresponsible, disrespectful little b**** of a child? Just a thought.
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #17
And I say that as an addict, gambling in my case. Heck, I've stared at my phone for over an hour debating whether or not I should bet ROD bucks.

Forgive me but I laughed at the last sentence. :)

During my drinking career I had some wacky roommates. One in particular had a gambling addiction. His brothers, who were good friends of mine, asked me to allow him to stay at my apartment. They paid his rent and living expenses directly to me and my other roommate who was their cousin. Yippee, more money for booze and drugs.

He had sold his father's machine shop without asking him and then sold the same shop to another client on the same day and pocketed the money. When both individuals came to claim their business, his father had a heart attack and died the same day. He had lost around $200,000 in a short time gambling it away. I guess the guilt tweaked his brain and he was never the same.

As long as he stayed on his meds he was okay to be around but when he wasn't he was dangerous. This dude was huge. One night I saw him beat the crap out of a Hell's Angel in the parking lot of a 7/11. There were several times where I saw him in a store stuffing food into his jacket. He was like a vagrant.

In San Jose, CA in those days there were card clubs that stayed open 24/7. He would hitchhike over there and back. Sometimes he'd win but mostly he lost and I'd get to hear how "I just know this next time I'll hit it big." The point of all this is that being addicted to gambling can be as deadly to a man, and those around him, as any other addiction. You already know that but maybe others here don't.
 

Prime Time

PT
Moderator
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
20,922
Name
Peter
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #18
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...-manziel-concussion-to-cover-up-his-drinking/

Report: Browns lied about Manziel concussion to cover up his drinking
Posted by Michael David Smith on February 9, 2016

In a report on the league’s own network, the Browns have been accused of lying about Johnny Manziel having a concussion in an effort to cover up that the real problem with Manziel was showing up to work drunk.

“Johnny Manziel, going into what would have been a start late in the season, showed up drunk at practice on a Wednesday. The Browns lied and said he was in the concussion protocol. Let me repeat that: The Browns lied, to try to protect, and I would argue enable, this irresponsible and very troubled young man,” Mike Silver said on the air on NFL Network.

As PFT pointed out at the time, there’s always been something very fishy about Manziel’s Week 17 concussion diagnosis. On Monday of the last week of the season, then-Browns coach Mike Pettine said he planned to talk to Manziel about a video that appeared to show him drinking alcohol and partying. At that time, there were no reports that Manziel being checked for a concussion.

Then, when Manziel showed up to work on Wednesday, it was announced that he had a concussion and couldn’t play in that Sunday’s season finale. It was never explained why the Browns only diagnosed this concussion three days after it supposedly happened, and two days after Pettine said he was going to have a stern talk with Manziel about his off-field issues.

If NFL Network’s report is correct, the NFL should come down hard on the Browns. The league has spent the last few years repeating, over and over again, that concussions are to be taken seriously. If the Browns are using bogus concussion diagnoses to avoid having to discuss players’ off-field problems, that would be an appalling misuse of the league’s injury reports.

So while the Browns are done with Manziel, they may not be done paying the price for hitching their wagon to him. Cleveland could be facing league discipline for lying about a concussion.
 

Mackeyser

Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
14,176
Name
Mack
Forgive me but I laughed at the last sentence. :)

During my drinking career I had some wacky roommates. One in particular had a gambling addiction. His brothers, who were good friends of mine, asked me to allow him to stay at my apartment. They paid his rent and living expenses directly to me and my other roommate who was their cousin. Yippee, more money for booze and drugs.

He had sold his father's machine shop without asking him and then sold the same shop to another client on the same day and pocketed the money. When both individuals came to claim their business, his father had a heart attack and died the same day. He had lost around $200,000 in a short time gambling it away. I guess the guilt tweaked his brain and he was never the same.

As long as he stayed on his meds he was okay to be around but when he wasn't he was dangerous. This dude was huge. One night I saw him beat the crap out of a Hell's Angel in the parking lot of a 7/11. There were several times where I saw him in a store stuffing food into his jacket. He was like a vagrant.

In San Jose, CA in those days there were card clubs that stayed open 24/7. He would hitchhike over there and back. Sometimes he'd win but mostly he lost and I'd get to hear how "I just know this next time I'll hit it big." The point of all this is that being addicted to gambling can be as deadly to a man, and those around him, as any other addiction. You already know that but maybe others here don't.

Word.
 

fearsomefour

Legend
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
17,100
And Favre used to pick the pain pills out of his vomit to swallow them down again....Broadway Joe was drunk....Vick murdered dogs....
If Manziel wants all forgiven all he needs to do is put up a 30 TD, 8 Int, 4,400 yard season and no one will really give a toss.