Kiper: 5 Best Offseasons

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,132
Name
Burger man
<a class="postlink" href="http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/9352196/nfl-kansas-city-chiefs-mel-kiper-five-favorite-offseasons" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/ ... offseasons</a>

A month ago, I was handing out my grades for the 2013 NFL draft. But NFL offseasons aren't just about the draft, because a number of teams already looked a lot different before the draft than they did in Week 17 of last season.

I saw a number of cases in which I felt what teams did in free agency clearly shifted how they approached the draft. When I talk to teams, I know they try to approach the draft with talent in mind and try not to overvalue what's already on the roster, but in a league where patience doesn't really exist, immediate help -- in the form of free agency or the draft -- matters.

You can't tell me that the presence of Alex Smith in Kansas City didn't at least marginally shift the way the Chiefs evaluated the 2013 draft class when it came to quarterbacks. Each process of evaluation affects the other.

I saw at least a dozen teams I could have picked for this list. But I was asked for five. So here you go: These are teams I think -- through the combination of the draft and free agency -- have been the most successful in upgrading their talent this offseason.

Kansas City Chiefs

Draft pick I liked: The pick of Eric Fisher at No. 1 overall is the biggest story, and it made sense because John Dorsey and Andy Reid know the success of Smith is directly tied to how good that offensive line is, in protection and in the run game. But another pick I liked was Nico Johnson at No. 99 overall. I had inside linebacker as a big need for them, and I think Johnson can play right away next to Derrick Johnson.

Personnel move I liked: Smith has always drawn mixed reactions as a quarterback. But whether you love him or hate him, he's a bona fide starter in this league and was having a good 2012 season before a concussion sidelined him and ushered in the Colin Kaepernick era. When you consider the dearth of ready-to-start quarterbacks in the draft, that the Chiefs got Smith for a second-round pick doesn't look bad at all. If he's effective, the Chiefs aced that move.

Big question remaining: For me, it's whether Dontari Poe can establish himself as a nose tackle worthy of his 2012 draft spot (No. 11). If he does, this defense could take a big step forward. Also, will Jonathan Baldwin break out in 2013?

Bottom line: I expect the Chiefs to be much, much better than their 2012 record, and a .500 finish isn't out of the question.

St. Louis Rams

Draft pick I liked: I love the combo St. Louis pulled off when it drafted college teammates Tavon Austin and Stedman Bailey. It was Bailey who actually caught more passes (113 to 111) and had more receiving yards (1,627 to 1,287) than Austin last year at West Virginia. That doesn't make him a better player, but between that and his workouts, he showed he's a weapon capable of creating space when eyes are on Austin. Sam Bradford could benefit. Alec Ogletree at No. 30 was also a borderline steal. He's an immediate starter.

Personnel move I liked: It took awhile, but getting Jake Long out of Miami fills a big void at left tackle. You're betting on health, but the Rams could be better at both tackle spots this season -- and they need to be because Bradford hasn't reacted well in the face of pressure.

Big question remaining: It's all on Bradford now. The Rams have weapons in place in the passing game, and the offensive line should be improved.

Bottom line: This is a team that could have an absolutely loaded roster in terms of its overall talent profile by this point next year. In fact, it's already among the NFL's most talented. If Bradford takes a step forward, the Rams can compete with Seattle and San Francisco (whom they went 2-1-1 against last season). If Bradford doesn't, his job should be in jeopardy heading into 2014.

Baltimore Ravens

Draft pick I liked: You can't do better than Baltimore did with its first two picks in terms of knocking out needs with players ready to help. Matt Elam (safety) and Arthur Brown (linebacker) step in immediately for roles vacated by Ed Reed and Ray Lewis, and, although you won't see it in the locker room, the defense should be better because of it.

Personnel move I liked: As messy as it was in Denver, Baltimore's move to swoop in and grab a proven pass-rusher such as Elvis Dumervil was both masterful and seemingly par for the course for this front office. Remember that Baltimore can't grab Dumervil if it does things like break the bank to retain Paul Kruger (Cleveland) or Dannell Ellerbe (Miami). I felt as if the market might have overvalued those two a little after the Super Bowl.

Big question remaining: Matt Williamson pointed to it in his offseason grades, but the Ravens are pretty light at wide receiver. Torrey Smith is really difficult to cover, but beyond that, they need to hope for consistency from Jacoby Jones or a potential breakthrough from a guy such as Tandon Doss or perhaps rookie Aaron Mellette. Tight ends Dennis Pitta and Ed Dickson should see a lot of targets.

Bottom line: They lost a lot, but I don't think they're any worse. You don't have to love Joe Flacco, but he has proved he can help them win at the highest level and he is now locked in. No team assumes it can play for Super Bowls year in and year out. The best you can do is give yourself a chance to compete for them; the Ravens do that as well as any organization.

Atlanta Falcons

Draft pick I liked: Give Thomas Dimitroff credit for a classic draft double-down. The Falcons were desperate for cornerback help, and they traded up for one immediate starter in Desmond Trufant and picked another guy who can help early in Robert Alford. Big need, big fix.

Personnel move I liked: People are going to shrug at the additions of Steven Jackson and Osi Umenyiora, but when you're a veteran team and it feels as if you need just a piece or two to be playing in the Super Bowl, these are the little moves that can make a difference. Atlanta needed a running back with something left and a pass-rusher with the same. This team is too good to draft high, not bad enough to tear it apart. I liked the moves and the constant push to get to a Super Bowl when it's not that easy to make any kind of huge improvement to the roster.

Big question remaining: Can the defense hold up at the point of attack? The Falcons could be run on last year, and they have a capable pass rush but not a scary one. This looks like a team that will have to outscore teams with good offenses.

Bottom line: They did what they could to tune up a strong but imperfect roster. But this is a team again capable of competing to play for and win a Super Bowl, and it's the third straight year we can say that. I don't know whether people realize how tough it is to be in that position year after year.

Arizona Cardinals

Draft pick I liked: The Cardinals got the player I think has the best chance to go to a Pro Bowl as a rookie. Jonathan Cooper isn't going to maul defenders in the run game, but he's a complete guard who further strengthens an offensive line that quietly made huge strides down the stretch last season. Yes, we're all interested to see Tyrann Mathieu and how he might transition to safety, which is really just a form of slot corner depending on the package, but Cooper provides immediate dividends.

Personnel move I liked: Hey, you don't have to love Carson Palmer, but the Cardinals have been a disaster at quarterback for two years and are wasting the late peak of Larry Fitzgerald's career in the process. Palmer still makes decisions that don't live up to his talent profile, but if you protect him and give him any kind of running game, he's a big step forward from what the Cardinals had. It's not really a debate. And they basically paid nothing in terms of draft value and simply have to write Palmer his sizable checks.

Big question remaining: It's really about Palmer and how well he is protected. The growth of Bobby Massie wasn't a fluke because he was a talented but raw player.

Bottom line: The Cardinals could compete to win other divisions. Like the Rams, though, they could be cast as a in the NFC West. This defense has a chance to be really tough, and I don't think any team will come to Arizona this year and assume a road victory.
 

albefree69

Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
4,512
Name
Alan
"and they need to be because Bradford hasn't reacted well in the face of pressure."
I don't mind when someone here says something like that (even though they're wrong) but I hate it when an idiot who has probably never watched a Ram game says things like that. :ahahah: :pissed:
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
33,891
Name
Stu
albefree69 said:
"and they need to be because Bradford hasn't reacted well in the face of pressure."
I don't mind when someone here says something like that (even though they're wrong) but I hate it when an idiot who has probably never watched a Ram game says things like that. :ahahah: :pissed:

You mean because NO QB does in the face of THAT kind of pressure? Imagine. Give a guy less than two seconds to throw and his stats go down. Whodathunk? :thbbt:
 

DR RAM

Rams Lifer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
12,111
Name
Rambeau
RamFan503 said:
albefree69 said:
"and they need to be because Bradford hasn't reacted well in the face of pressure."
I don't mind when someone here says something like that (even though they're wrong) but I hate it when an idiot who has probably never watched a Ram game says things like that. :ahahah: :pissed:

You mean because NO QB does in the face of THAT kind of pressure? Imagine. Give a guy less than two seconds to throw and his stats go down. Whodathunk? :thbbt:
Didn't we recently see stats that proved Bradford played better than average while being pressured??


Doesn't really matter though. I think that we can all agree that we want to see Sam perform at a higher level this year, and he will have a chance, because this will be, by far, the best o-line that he's had, and we have speed at every position.
 

albefree69

Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
4,512
Name
Alan
DR RAM unsuccessfully trying to jog his memory:
Didn't we recently see stats that proved Bradford played better than average while being pressured??

I'm getting the different boards confused but I kind of remember reading that He had a much higher QBR rating in the 4th quarter which would be pretty close.
 

brokeu91

The super shrink
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
5,546
Name
Michael
albefree69 said:
"and they need to be because Bradford hasn't reacted well in the face of pressure."
I don't mind when someone here says something like that (even though they're wrong) but I hate it when an idiot who has probably never watched a Ram game says things like that. :ahahah: :pissed:
Totally agree

I think Bradford has been great in pressure. In fact sometimes when he has too much time he over-thinks it. It's clear that people who write this $hit don't actually watch the Rams games.
 

EastRam

Pro Bowler
Joined
Apr 4, 2013
Messages
1,994
503 used an emoticon ur work is done Albe
You mean because NO QB does in the face of THAT kind of pressure? Imagine. Give a guy less than two seconds to throw and his stats go down. Whodathunk?
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
DR RAM said:
RamFan503 said:
albefree69 said:
"and they need to be because Bradford hasn't reacted well in the face of pressure."
I don't mind when someone here says something like that (even though they're wrong) but I hate it when an idiot who has probably never watched a Ram game says things like that. :ahahah: :pissed:

You mean because NO QB does in the face of THAT kind of pressure? Imagine. Give a guy less than two seconds to throw and his stats go down. Whodathunk? :thbbt:
Didn't we recently see stats that proved Bradford played better than average while being pressured??


Doesn't really matter though. I think that we can all agree that we want to see Sam perform at a higher level this year, and he will have a chance, because this will be, by far, the best o-line that he's had, and we have speed at every position.
That was part of the cornucopia of stats Bernie provided some time ago...

Bradford progressed more than most realized 2012, establishing career highs for yardage (3,702), yards per attempt (6.7), touchdown passes (21), NFL passer rating (82.6) and Total QBR (51.6). By the way: Total QBR, developed by ESPN, is a newer, more refined system of evaluating quarterback play.

Bradford’s 21 touchdown passes were more than Detroit’s Matthew Stafford, Jay Cutler and Cam Newton. And only one fewer than Joe Flacco and Matt Schaub. I didn’t see Calvin Johnson, Brandon Marshall, Steve Smith, Torrey Smith, Anquan Boldin or Andre Johnson in a Rams uniform.

I’ll present the general criticism of Bradford’s play in 2012 and try to address each point.

1. Bradford can’t throw the deep ball.

In 20012 Bradford was rated 12th among NFL quarterbacks in deep-pass accuracy by the respected analysts at Pro Football Focus. His deep-ball accuracy scored higher than that of Tom Brady, Philip Rivers, Flacco, Cutler and Tony Romo.

[hil]2. Bradford doesn’t throw well when under pressure.

Pro Football Focus had him 12th in accuracy when delivering throws when hurried by the pass rush – ahead of Eli Manning, Andrew Luck, Brady, Rivers, Newton, Cutler and Stafford.[/hil]

3. Bradford isn’t a “clutch” quarterback.

According to Mike Sando of ESPN.com, Bradford ranked fourth behind Peyton Manning, Colin Kaepernick and Cutler in Total QBR during fourth quarters and overtimes. Bradford was tied for third among NFL quarterbacks with four fourth-quarter comebacks, and he finished sixth with three game-winning drives.

4. Bradford doesn’t make plays inside the red zone.

During the Rams’ bye week, the coaches ripped up their red-zone offense and put in a new one. The result: over the final eight games Bradford threw nine touchdown passes and one interception for an impressive red-zone passer rating of 101.8.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/bernie-miklasz/bernie-bradford-in-position-to-succeed/article_87d0481f-a20b-5098-9ee9-9d729c73e111.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/ ... 3e111.html</a>
 

nighttrain

Legend
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
9,216
albefree69 said:
"and they need to be because Bradford hasn't reacted well in the face of pressure."
I don't mind when someone here says something like that (even though they're wrong) but I hate it when an idiot who has probably never watched a Ram game says things like that. :ahahah: :pissed:
Albe I looked back and couldn't find the comment, sure you're readin the right article:)
train
 

DR RAM

Rams Lifer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
12,111
Name
Rambeau
X said:
DR RAM said:
RamFan503 said:
albefree69 said:
"and they need to be because Bradford hasn't reacted well in the face of pressure."
I don't mind when someone here says something like that (even though they're wrong) but I hate it when an idiot who has probably never watched a Ram game says things like that. :ahahah: :pissed:

You mean because NO QB does in the face of THAT kind of pressure? Imagine. Give a guy less than two seconds to throw and his stats go down. Whodathunk? :thbbt:
Didn't we recently see stats that proved Bradford played better than average while being pressured??


Doesn't really matter though. I think that we can all agree that we want to see Sam perform at a higher level this year, and he will have a chance, because this will be, by far, the best o-line that he's had, and we have speed at every position.
That was part of the cornucopia of stats Bernie provided some time ago...

Bradford progressed more than most realized 2012, establishing career highs for yardage (3,702), yards per attempt (6.7), touchdown passes (21), NFL passer rating (82.6) and Total QBR (51.6). By the way: Total QBR, developed by ESPN, is a newer, more refined system of evaluating quarterback play.

Bradford’s 21 touchdown passes were more than Detroit’s Matthew Stafford, Jay Cutler and Cam Newton. And only one fewer than Joe Flacco and Matt Schaub. I didn’t see Calvin Johnson, Brandon Marshall, Steve Smith, Torrey Smith, Anquan Boldin or Andre Johnson in a Rams uniform.

I’ll present the general criticism of Bradford’s play in 2012 and try to address each point.

1. Bradford can’t throw the deep ball.

In 20012 Bradford was rated 12th among NFL quarterbacks in deep-pass accuracy by the respected analysts at Pro Football Focus. His deep-ball accuracy scored higher than that of Tom Brady, Philip Rivers, Flacco, Cutler and Tony Romo.

[hil]2. Bradford doesn’t throw well when under pressure.

Pro Football Focus had him 12th in accuracy when delivering throws when hurried by the pass rush – ahead of Eli Manning, Andrew Luck, Brady, Rivers, Newton, Cutler and Stafford.[/hil]

3. Bradford isn’t a “clutch” quarterback.

According to Mike Sando of ESPN.com, Bradford ranked fourth behind Peyton Manning, Colin Kaepernick and Cutler in Total QBR during fourth quarters and overtimes. Bradford was tied for third among NFL quarterbacks with four fourth-quarter comebacks, and he finished sixth with three game-winning drives.

4. Bradford doesn’t make plays inside the red zone.

During the Rams’ bye week, the coaches ripped up their red-zone offense and put in a new one. The result: over the final eight games Bradford threw nine touchdown passes and one interception for an impressive red-zone passer rating of 101.8.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/bernie-miklasz/bernie-bradford-in-position-to-succeed/article_87d0481f-a20b-5098-9ee9-9d729c73e111.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/ ... 3e111.html</a>
Boomskey!

Is that red font a randomizer thingy? It's pretty funny.
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
DR RAM said:
Is that red font a randomizer thingy? It's pretty funny.
lol. nah, that's just Albe's way of quoting people.
We encourage him to express himself so he'll grow out of his shell. :sly:
 

albefree69

Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
4,512
Name
Alan
nighttrain carrying on a somewhat contentious conversation with himself:
whoops by bad, found it. But what QB excels with a goofy OL?

Exactly. I think all three of us can agree with that. :whome?:

DR RAM getting in touch with his inner mentalist:
Boomskey!

That's why they call you The Doctor! :bowdown:
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
33,891
Name
Stu
X said:
DR RAM said:
Is that red font a randomizer thingy? It's pretty funny.
lol. nah, that's just Albe's way of quoting people.
We encourage him to express himself so he'll grow out of his shell. :sly:

And just what kind of nut is that shell from? :neener:
 

DR RAM

Rams Lifer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
12,111
Name
Rambeau
X said:
DR RAM said:
Is that red font a randomizer thingy? It's pretty funny.
lol. nah, that's just Albe's way of quoting people.
We encourage him to express himself so he'll grow out of his shell. :sly:
Love it, lol.

Is he the son of World Be Free?
 

Rambitious1

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
4,449
Name
Tom
Ya, most of these guys don't want to be confused with the facts.