Jeff Fisher confident in getting O-line fixed/Wagoner

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamBill

Legend
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
8,874
Jeff Fisher confident in getting O-line fixed
By Nick Wagoner

http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-ra...her-confident-in-getting-offensive-line-fixed

PHOENIX -- Perhaps the St. Louis Rams haven't showed the urgency that many would like when it comes to their holes on the offensive line, but that doesn't mean they aren't aware of what needs to be done over the next few weeks.

"Yeah, there's still some spots available, if you will," coach Jeff Fisher said Wednesday morning.

That's putting it mildly. As it stands, the Rams have just three offensive linemen -- left tackle Greg Robinson, guard Rodger Saffold and swingman Garrett Reynolds -- with any meaningful NFL game experience. And even out of those three, Robinson is entering his second year with plenty of work to do, Saffold has a lengthy injury history and is coming off surgery and Reynolds was brought in to provide depth.

So the Rams have room for starters at one guard spot, right tackle and center. There are some obvious and known solutions for the Rams that still remain on the free-agent market and Fisher hinted that business could pick back up after this week's owners meetings.

Heading up that list is right tackle Joe Barksdale. Fisher said discussions with Barksdale are on-going and he remains hopeful that something can get worked out. Barksdale was recently married and has been on his honeymoon so there might not have been a lot of urgency to get a deal done but Fisher pointed to prices early on that clearly exceeded what the Rams or any other team was willing to meet.

"I was a little surprised at their asking price initially," Fisher said. "I think things have settled down a little bit. We'd like to have Joe back. Joe played well at times, he had some outstanding games. He had some difficult matchups as well. But Joe knows us ... and I think it makes sense to get Joe back."

That coincides with what we heard in February when various league types estimated prices for Barksdale anywhere from as low as $4 million per year all the way up to $7 million per year. If that price was indeed on the high end, it's not much of a surprise that Barksdale is still available.

The same could probably be said for other free-agent options the Rams are still considering. Guard Justin Blalock and center Stefan Wisniewski remain available and the Rams have expressed at least some interest in both players. It's unlikely the Rams have the cap space or the inclination to sign all three but they could find a way to make two work if they wanted.

"There's still several free agents out there that we're in discussions with but we're looking toward the draft," Fisher said. "It's not one of those things we're going to panic about particularly because of who we've got lined up."

Fisher called this year's draft "outstanding" as far as the offensive line is concerned which might also offer another clue as to why they have not been in a rush to sign players that might exceed where they have them valued.

There are also some younger in-house options who could be in the mix though the Rams' confidence in those players might only be as real as how easily they can find an upgrade elsewhere.

At center, in particular, Fisher again offered an endorsement of sorts for Barrett Jones and Demetrius Rhaney. Jones has played a total of 22 snaps on offense in his first two seasons in the league and Rhaney sat out his rookie year after a knee injury in training camp.

"Barrett showed that he can play and we have confidence in Demetrius Rhaney," Fisher said. "We have Greg and Rodg. We've added Garrett so we've got depth and we're kind of excited about what direction we're headed."

Still, it would come as a surprise and be a major step in the wrong direction if the Rams don't add a legitimate starter or two on the offensive line before the draft.

"Well, it's either money or ideal fit," Fisher said. "There are some players out there that still have value at a number of positions. Once we get back from the meetings then things pick up."
 

Rmfnlt

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
5,342
Alfred-E-Newman--13439.jpg
 

Amitar

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
1,096
Name
Amitar
I'll believe when I see it. Right now the chances are slim to none. More Fisher CYA BS.
 

Ramhusker

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 15, 2010
Messages
13,772
Name
Bo Bowen
I hope he's confident. It could cost him his job.
 

FRO

Legend
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
5,308
I doubt they sign anybody before the draft. I see them going offensive line heavy in the draft. I think they are comfortable with every other position on the team.
 

Athos

Legend
Joined
May 19, 2014
Messages
5,933
I doubt they sign anybody before the draft. I see them going offensive line heavy in the draft. I think they are comfortable with every other position on the team.

That'd be stupid and I'd lose faith in Fisher if we don't sign one guy. Forcing your hand in the draft to go need over BPA is a really dumb strategy and Fisher should be better than that.

Anyone even know how much cap room we have left?
 

thehammer

Rookie
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
245
rams haven't even been able to get Blalock or Wisniewski in for a visit....most agents want there players to visit bad teams hoping to drive up the market price....
Fishe,r "Barksdale played well at times" and "good draft for olinemen" coachspeak for Barksdale ain't that good and doubt we will can get any decent fa to sign here....there was a reason Detroit was willing to let Fairly walk even after losing Suh. Major bust and headache at Detroit.

Likely Reynolds was signed to be are starter at rg replacing Joseph. Rhaney and Jones will battle it out to be the center and we will draft a rt..probably TJ Clemmings.
 

DaveFan'51

Old-Timer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 18, 2014
Messages
18,666
Name
Dave
That'd be stupid and I'd lose faith in Fisher if we don't sign one guy. Forcing your hand in the draft to go need over BPA is a really dumb strategy and Fisher should be better than that.

Anyone even know how much cap room we have left?
Snead made it clear in an interview, just a couple days ago, That he "..prefers to go BPA and not be forced to go for need in his picks!" I Trust him and Fisher!!
 

V3

Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Messages
3,848
Snead made it clear in an interview, just a couple days ago, That he "..prefers to go BPA and not be forced to go for need in his picks!" I Trust him and Fisher!!
Well, they're kinda forcing their picks if they don't sign at least two Olineman.
 

DR RAM

Rams Lifer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
12,111
Name
Rambeau
rams haven't even been able to get Blalock or Wisniewski in for a visit....most agents want there players to visit bad teams hoping to drive up the market price....
Fishe,r "Barksdale played well at times" and "good draft for olinemen" coachspeak for Barksdale ain't that good and doubt we will can get any decent fa to sign here....there was a reason Detroit was willing to let Fairly walk even after losing Suh. Major bust and headache at Detroit.

Likely Reynolds was signed to be are starter at rg replacing Joseph. Rhaney and Jones will battle it out to be the center and we will draft a rt..probably TJ Clemmings.
That's very specific, but would probably work. Do you think Clemmings is a top 10, or see him in a trade down scenario? Just interested in your opinion, not going to argue whether he's the best fit, or a top 10 player.
 

jjab360

Legend
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
6,644
Well, they're kinda forcing their picks if they don't sign at least two Olineman.
They'd probably still go BPA even if they have holes on the OL entering the draft. They (and most good GMs) don't see the draft the way fans and the media do. It's not a means to fill short term holes, it's a resource to get the best possible players for the long term future.
 

V3

Hall of Fame
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Messages
3,848
They'd probably still go BPA even if they have holes on the OL entering the draft. They (and most good GMs) don't see the draft the way fans and the media do. It's not a means to fill short term holes, it's a resource to get the best possible players for the long term future.
I agree that it shouldn't be used for short term gains but when the one thing that protects your QB is Swiss cheese, you can't stick to BPA any longer. It should have never gotten to this point, IMO. There's still time but the quality is quickly diminishing and there's still three holes to fill. I don't expect to find game one starting quality players in the third round or later so if they still have three holes to fill, that means the first two picks pretty much have to be O-lineman or Foles should change his name Folds.
 

jjab360

Legend
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
6,644
I agree that it shouldn't be used for short term gains but when the one thing that protects your QB is Swiss cheese, you can't stick to BPA any longer. It should have never gotten to this point, IMO. There's still time but the quality is quickly diminishing and there's still three holes to fill. I don't expect to find game one starting quality players in the third round or later so if they still have three holes to fill, that means the first two picks pretty much have to be O-lineman or Foles should change his name Folds.
It helps to have a QB whose ACL doesn't explode when he gets breathed on too heavy. *Shots fired* Still love ya, Sam.