How to Win in the Modern NFL! Drafting a Dynasty!

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamsAndEwe

Rookie
Joined
Apr 2, 2014
Messages
421
I have found the lost chord, the Holy Grail! I know the key ingredient to winning in the NFL Yet, I'm not the only one to stumble upon Shangri-La.

It was a dark and stormy night, and the entire ship's crew were scurrying above deck in hurricane winds, drowning beneath an onslaught of blinding rain, every able body man struggling to save the ancient whaling ship Saint Louis from sinking, thus sending every soul en masse to Davy Jones Locker. More than one of the rain drenched, emaciated crew prayed to a god they didn't believe in. The first mate Jeff Fisher thought, " This isn't what I signed up for!" And to think just a few days ago the sea had been smooth as glass. Nary a cloud in the sky and...

The author wishes to apologize for accidently exposing Rams fans to my novel in progress. Yet, the title of this tale is true. I will also expose you to the key to winning in the NFL. I believe Snead and Fisher are on to something good.



Back to reality! The first three waves of free agency have paved the path for Snead and Fisher, to draft key players, who will make the Rams a winner and playoff contender in 2014! I believe a GM should plug holes in free agency and draft the best player available in the draft. And the Rams spent their 2014 free agency period plugging holes. So far so good!

We'll talk more about Free Agency and the Rams upcoming draft towards a dynasty later in my article. Before I proceed, allow me to post some eye popping stats, which will bolster my hypothesis on How to Win in the Modern NFL!

1. The Rams defense have accumulated more sacks then any NFL team in the last two years! How cool is that?
2. In 2013, the Rams had more sacks then any NFC West Team! In 2013, The Rams allowed less sacks then any NFC West team. Yet, we finished in dead last in the NFC west! What?

Conclusion- The Rams outstanding positive NFC West Sack differential did not translate into WINS!

2013 NFL Offensive Line Rankings

A handful Teams with 10 or more wins, and their Offensive Line Rankings

32nd (last place) Arizona Cardinals
26th- Super Bowl Champion Seattle Seahawks

24th Indianapolis Colts 20th- Kansas City
16th New England Patriots

17th- Saint Louis Rams

A handful of Losing Teams and their Offensive Line Rankings...

3rd ranked Washington
4th ranked Dallas ( Ok 8-8 record)
5th ranked Cleveland
6th ranked Minnesota
7th ranked Detroit

Conclusion- It would appear there is little or no correlation between offensive line ranking and Won/Loss Record. Before any of you get your dandruff up , Let me say, I'm aware more than one winning team had a superior offensive line. The Denver Bronco's are a shining example. A superior offensive line won't stop you from winning. I'm only saying, there isn't a statically valid correlation between superior offensive lines and winning records.

- In 2013, Six of the Nine Worst Rush Defenses made the Playoffs! I find that hard to believe! Half the teams who made the playoffs in 2013, had pathetic rushing defenses. Bottom of the barrel sieves!

Conclusion- When it comes to Winning, a powerful rushing defense is not a key ingredient! Not in the Modern NFL! Not during the regular season. The playoff season however is a different animal. More on that later.

I took all the 2013 Playoff teams YDS/A passing differentials and YDS/A rushing differentials. I included the Arizona Cardinals in my calculations, since they won 10 games. Fair enough?

Quick explanation of YDS/A rushing differential and YDS/A Passing Differential.

Example: During the 2013 regular season the New Orleans Saints offense averaged 3.8 yards per rushing attempt, but their defense allowed 4.6 yards per rushing attempt, thus the New Orleans Saints had a negative YDS/A rushing differential of minus 0.8. Understand? I used the same methodology to calculate YDS/A Passing differential. Are you with me so far?.

Results

11/13 or 85% of playoff teams had positive YDS/A passing differentials
7/13 or 54% of playoff teams had positive YDS/ Rushing attempt differentials.

Philadelphia was the only playoff team to have greater that 1.0 yard positive YDS/A rushing differential. The Eagles offense averaged 1.3 yards more per rush then their defense allowed.

YDS/A Passing Differential. In 2013, 6/13 playoff teams had greater than a 1.0 yard positive YDS/A passing differential. The Super Bowl Champion Seattle Seahawks passing offense gained 2.45 more yards per passing attempt then their defense allowed! Best YDS/A passing differential in entire NFL!

The Philadelphia Eagles averaged 5.1 yards per rush in 2013, the only team in the entire NFL to average 5 yards per rushing attempt! Tampa Bay averaged 6.3 yards per pass in 2013. the lowest yards per passing attempt in the NFL. Do the math people. Tampa Bay gained 1.2 more yards per passing play than the Philadelphia did per rushing play.

What about the Rams Ewe! Every team in the NFC West , except for the Saint Louis Rams had a positive passing differential greater than 1.0 yard per attempt. The 2013 Rams had a negative passing YDS/a differential of minus 1.26 yards per passing attempt. Only the Washington Redskins had a worse YDS/A passing differential! Thank God we got their draft pick.

Conclusions-

1. A positive YDS/A passing differential has a very high correlation to a positive W/L record.

2. A positive YDS/A rushing differential does not have a significant correlation to a positive or negative W/L record.

3. When it comes to winning in the modern NFL, passing offense and passing defense matters more than Rushing offense and rushing defense.

Remember 6 of the 9 worst NFL rushing defenses made the playoffs in 2013!

Next, I decided to crunch the numbers for every 2013 NFL team's YDS/A passing differential. What did I find?
1. Teams like the Titians, Bears, and Lions with zero YDS/A passing differentials had either 8-8 or 7-9 records.
2. Only one team in the entire NFL with a losing record ( the 7-9 New York Giants) had a positive YDS/A passing differential. The NYG had a + 0.5 YDS/A passing differential.

3. The Kansas City Chiefs - 0.53 and Indianapolis Colts -0.52 YDS/A passing differentials stand alone as the only NFL teams with winning records and a negative YDS/A passing differentials! We know the Colts beat KC in a wild wildcard playoff shocker, and then lost to the New England Patriots in the next round. Total Playoff record for negative YDS/A passing differential teams...1 win and 2 losses.

4. We biologists like to say, "Treasure your exceptions." The Chiefs, Colts and the Giants were the only exceptions in 2013. I won't delve to deep into these team's seasons. But in passing, I will point out The Interception Exception to my YDS/A pass differential hypothesis. The Giants led the NFL in futility, throwing 29 Interceptions! Six more interceptions than the next team! The Chiefs threw a league low of 8 interceptions, while the Colts QB's were tied for 3rd, throwing only 10 interceptions!

Conclusion- During the 2013 NFL season, there was a very high correlation between winning records and positive YDS/A passing differential, and very high correlation between losing records and negative YDS/A passing differentials.

History Lesson... From 2003-2013 115 out of 132 or 87.1% of playoff teams had a positive YDS/A passing differentials!

Rams Review
-
Rams led the NFC West in Sacks.
Rams offensive line allowed fewer sacks than any NFC West team.
Rams were the only team in the NFC West with a negative YDS/A passing differential, a pathetic -1.26 YDS/A!
Rams had the 2nd ranked offensive line in the NFC West.
Rams led the NFL in stopping running backs behind the line of scrimmage.
Rams were 2nd in the NFC West behind the Cardinals in stopping the Run.

Before Sam Bradford's freak injury, Sam was on his way to his best year yet, as Sam had the 11th highest Passer Rating in the NFL. Not bad! Yet, Sam Bradford's 6.44 yards per attempt came in a lowly 34th among qualifying quarterbacks . I know Rams wide receivers dropped their share of passes. So, I asked myself, How much difference would it have made if the Rams receivers led the league with the fewest drops?
I recorded each dropped pass as a 7 yard completion and recalibrated the numbers. The results? Sam's new 6.71 YDS/A propelled him into 27th place.

How does a positive YDS/A differential work out on the field Ewe?

The fewer plays it takes to score a TD, the less the chance a scoring drive is thwarted by penalty, interception or fumble. Your chances of screwing up are greater on a 14 play drive than on a 6 play drive. Does that make sense?

Even the worst NFL passing attempt team averages 1.2 yards more per passing play than the best rushing team. Am I still making sense?

Also every game runs out of time twice... Halftime and Game Over! Passing is the quickest way to score and slow down the clock, while a demonic pass defense forces turnovers, offensive mistakes until the offense runs out of downs or time.

If the Rams plan to win, and make the playoffs, the Rams must increase their YDS/A passing differential. There are two basic ways to attain such a goal. Offensively and Defensively. Duh! Right?

Offense-
Quarterback. The Rams are going to keep Sam Bradford, therefore switching quarterbacks is not an option in 2014.

Drafting a #1 Wide Receiver is an option, and I predict the Rams will draft a WR in the first two rounds. In 2013, the Rams top receiver Chris Givens was ranked 79th in the league. Armed with a pathetic stat like that, you can make an argument that the Rams don't have #2 receiver, much less a true #1 WR!
We need a wide receiver who gains yards after the catch, and who takes pressure off of Tavon Austin, Quick, Cook, and Zak Stacy.

Coaching and offensive game planning- Changing offensive coordinators and wide receiver coaches is not an option in 2014. We can only pray that Schotty has figured out how to utilize Tavon Austin, Cook and whichever wide receiver the Rams draft in 2014. Don't get me started! This is stuff for whole another article.

Offensive Line- Before someone gets their panties in a wad about Big Uglies, and screams Robinson, take into count that Rams offensive line was ranked higher than Arizona (32) and Seattle(26). Stats show little correlation between great offensive lines and winning records. I'm not saying teams with great offensive lines lose! I'm saying teams with negative YDS/A passing differentials lose. Perhaps that's why Jeff Fisher has never drafted an offensive lineman in the first round?

I like Jake Mathews more than Greg Robinson. Jake Mathews is a superior pass blocker than Robinson. I'm sure you've noticed, I value pass blocking more than run blocking in the modern NFL. ( I do miss the days of Eric Dickerson! Jackie Slater and that classic wrecking crew! Memories!) But I digress.


Philosophy Break- The regular season and the playoff season are two different animals! In the playoffs NFL Refs back off and let the Men play. During the Regular season, defensive pass interference penalties suddenly morph into outstanding defensive coverage plays! I'm sure I'm not the only person on ROD to notice this post season playoff phenomenon! It happens every year, in much the same way beautiful women instinctively flock like the salmon to Capistrano.
Thus, high scoring offenses get you to playoffs, but 80% of the time it's the dominating defense that wins the Super Bowl.

Demonic Dominating Defensive Dynasty- I can dig RamzFan's Hitler video and point of view. Hilarious! Put's Saturday Night Live to shame! I digress.

It would behoove the Rams to come out of the NFL draft with at least 3 upgrades on defense.

Cornerback- We need a wide receiver leech at cornerback. A cornerback cornerstone who can blitz, play press, and man to man, so that Gregg Williams front SEVEN can torcher opposing offenses with a plethora of blitzes. We need defensive backs who crack wide receivers vertebrate the moment the touch the ball. Sure tacklers! We need a cornerback before the 2nd round is over! I prefer Justin Gilbert over any free safety in this draft.

Free Safety- We need a rangy free safety, with great instincts. Yet, I want a free safety who hits like a rhinocerous. The surest shortest path to winning the Super Bowl is the NFL #1 Defense. Snead and Fisher must draft defense to put the Nasty Defefsive Dynasty! Can you dig it? Draft for D! Our new free safety must make receivers suffer. I prefer Calvin Pryor over Ha Ha Clinton-Dix. I've watched plenty film on those Pryor and Clinton-Dix.. I haven't watched much tape on the rest of the 2014 safety draft class. I know their names. Jimmie Ward, Deone Bucannon and Dion Bailey. If any of you have seen them play, let me know.

Linebacker- Draft Jadeveon Clowney if we can't trade down. ( I believe Clowney can play DE, DT, and Outside lineback his first year) If you read my first post on ROD, then you know all my reasons. I'm cool with Mack, Mosely, and Shazier. Through November of last year our linebackers were allowing an obscenely high passing YDS/A . Worst in the NFL. We improved a little in December. Thank God. Alec Olgetree was a rookie, and I expect him to improve. Tight Ends and Wide Receivers were killing us over the middle. Perhaps we can place this albatross around Tim Walton and throw him overboard? If we want a demonic dominating defensive dynasty we must draft an OLB or Clowney within the first 3 rounds! And we need to draft depth at middle linebacker, a little later.

Defensive Tackle- I like the Rams signing DT Alex Carrington. He blocks a few extra points and field goals every year. In 2011 the Bills tried him out at OLB. He's a space eater. He's a versatile guy. Yet, If the Rams trade back their 13th pick and nab a defensive tackle of Aaron Donald caliber and an extra pick I won't cry. If we can't trade down and we stay at #2 we must draft Clowney, because he can play DT on rushing downs. Imagine Clowney, Quinn, Long, and either Brokers or Hayes rushing a terrified quarterback. Clowney is great against the run too. I would take Clowney at #2 over Watkins or anybody.

A smart GM looks 2-5 years into the future. It would be stupid to draft a Left Tackle to play guard or replace Jake Long for a month. If we draft a Left Tackle earlier...Do it because you foresee the Big Ugly playing left tackle for a decade. I'm down with that!

A smart GM point plugs holes in through free agency and drafts Best Player Available in the draft. Of course a smart GM manipulates the draft, and trades backwards or forwards to obtain the Best Player Available to fulfill a need, if at all possible.

An incestuous Coach uses late round picks for depth, special teams, offensive linemen, and to trade for proven vets! The 49'ers trading a 6th round pick for Anquan Boldin is a good example of such a trade. I'm joking, but seriously a few trades like that crop up every year. Be prepared to jump on it Snead!

Snead signed Saffold, Dunbar, a Defensive Tackle, back up QB, and a defensive back. We didn't sign any uber expensive free agents. Jo Lonn Dunbar, a backup defensive tackle, drug addled defensive backs and wide receivers on parole come cheap.

Since the advent of relatively cheap rookie contracts and Salary Caps, it makes sense to draft the expensive positions like franchise QB's, dominate DE's, #1 WR's, and cornerbacks early in the draft. Plug in and sign solid starting guards, linebackers, 2nd tier WRs, DT's and rotational linemen thru free agency. And draft running backs late.

Final Thought - I believe the Rams will use 3 out of their first 5 picks on defense. Early defensive picks will emphasize stopping the pass. Conversely early offensive draft picks should supplement the passing game. A strong passing game should open up our running game. It's all good! But defense is better. If the Rams make the playoffs in 2014. A dominating defense will take the Rams further than a high octane offense.
 
Last edited:

SierraRam

Recreational User
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
2,254
images
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,790
I appreciate the work put in. My personal opinion that has been shaped over the years is that there's no one formula to winning or building a great team. Know your strengths, know your weaknesses, and have a vision for what you want to do. Trust your vision. Don't try to copy another team. If you want to win, you gotta do it your own way.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,082
Name
Burger man
I appreciate the work put in. My personal opinion that has been shaped over the years is that there's no one formula to winning or building a great team. Know your strengths, know your weaknesses, and have a vision for what you want to do. Trust your vision. Don't try to copy another team. If you want to win, you gotta do it your own way.

burger-king-logo-have-it-your-way.jpg
 

SierraRam

Recreational User
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
2,254
Final Thought - I believe the Rams will use 3 out of their first 5 picks on defense. Early defensive picks will emphasize stopping the pass. Conversely early offensive draft picks should supplement the passing game. A strong passing game should open up our running game. It's all good! But defense is better. If the Rams make the playoffs in 2014. A dominating defense will take the Rams further than a high octane offense.

The Rams never seem to get the key 3rd down stops late in the game. Like you said, opposing receivers kill us over the middle! Our guys wear down because our offensive ineptitude.

With our first 4 picks we need to go OL, CB, S, OL in that order. 2 OL to sustain drives & 2 DB's to stop the other team from running wild in the secondary (and maybe throw in Donald)

The forum agrees for the most part on which OL's and CB's to go after, but there's alot of disagreement on Safeties. I'd like to hear your thoughts after you have time to research the top 4 or 5. I like Pryor over Dix, and the next tier has some gems too.
 

Alan

Legend
Joined
Oct 22, 2013
Messages
9,765
RamsAndEwe with a nice novella:
It would behoove the Rams to come out of the NFL draft with at least 3 upgrades on defense.

Final Thought
- I believe the Rams will use 3 out of their first 5 picks on defense. Early defensive picks will emphasize stopping the pass. Conversely early offensive draft picks should supplement the passing game. A strong passing game should open up our running game.
Great post Ewe!

I agree with much of what you wrote. The parts that I have quoted I'm completely on board with. I'm hoping that the other 2 picks will be O-linemen (especially the first one).
It's funny how that has undergone an almost complete reversal since the rules changed. Although I still believe it works the other way too. It's just a lot harder to execute without making an error.
 

Cardncub

Rookie
Joined
Apr 15, 2014
Messages
234
Very good work Ewe. I wish you would become a Cards fan & post on ASFN.:D You can post there anyways. I think you would be well respected there with your knowledge & content of your posts. Most the fans there are very knowledgeable. Mojo Ram is a member there because he's local & well respected for his Rams opinions on everything football.
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,790
Great post Ewe!

I agree with much of what you wrote. The parts that I have quoted I'm completely on board with. I'm hoping that the other 2 picks will be O-linemen (especially the first one).
It's funny how that has undergone an almost complete reversal since the rules changed. Although I still believe it works the other way too. It's just a lot harder to execute without making an error.

My personal opinion is that it still works better the other way. :)
 

GreenMays

UDFA
Joined
Sep 27, 2013
Messages
23
This is why it is frustrating to have an Offensive Coordinator whose best YDS/A year ranking in 8 years was 16th in the league, and all 7 other years were 21st or worse. The main reason the Jets made playoff runs in 2009 and 2010 was their defense was in the top 4 in both rushing and passing YDS/A. We are still a ways away from having a top 4 passing defense.
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
22,897
Name
mojo
Excellent post Ewe. Good research.
My opinion on NFL trends is this(short version)...

Right now the Rams are chasing SF,SEA and AZ.
SF/SEA are winning in similar ways. IMO the Rams and Cardinals are both looking to build teams that will counter what SF/SEA are doing in a sense. The Rams and Cards can't miraculously copycat the personnel and philosophies of those teams.

It is wise to do your own thing(as Jrry alluded to) but also to realize that when your chasing superior teams it's a good idea to mold your team so that eventually YOU are creating mismatches on the field, rather than trying to duplicate what they're doing.

In a few years the landscape or blueprint will likely change again, and smart GM's/HC's realize this IMO. The Rams should be in the mindset that they are building a young team who's players will mature along with an offensive/defensive philosophy that will force a then older SF/SEA team to adjust to us.
A universally recognized winning philosophy today has only a limited shelf life. One should plan ahead and build their team accordingly.

JMO
 
Last edited:

Alan

Legend
Joined
Oct 22, 2013
Messages
9,765
jrry thinking the old ways are best:
My personal opinion is that it still works better the other way. :)
I'm right on the edge of agreeing with that jrry. I have two issues which are keeping me from going over to the darkside with you.

The first issue is the one I alluded to in my other post. Long drives are more subject to turnovers IMO. In addition, running games frequently lead to 3rd and short situations and while I'm sure this is just my imagination, we seem to get stuffed on so many of those and wind up punting. A really good passing team has so many more options to choose from. The short pass being my favorite.

My other issue and it's probably the most important one, is that when you don't run a medium to high potency passing game, which takes a lot of practice, it's incredibly hard, if not impossible, to come back when you're behind by a lot. I don't believe you can just turn that on and off like a light switch. Running centered Offenses also require a better defense than passing offenses because of that.

The other issue of the opposing D not respecting your run game is probably no different that when they don't respect your passing game and stack the box. So that doesn't really effect my view point.

It's very close in my mind though. All in all, I prefer the 1999 Rams mix of run and pass. There were many games where our running game faltered but our passing game was always potent. It was our D (or lack of it) that doomed us. I don't think anyone should read too much into the Seahag victory in the SB because anyone can get blown out in any game on any Sunday.
 
Last edited:

LesBaker

Mr. Savant
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
17,460
Name
Les
The video was fantastic.

The rest was too, but man that movie was so damn silly how can you hate it?
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
22,897
Name
mojo
Very good work Ewe. I wish you would become a Cards fan & post on ASFN.:D You can post there anyways. I think you would be well respected there with your knowledge & content of your posts. Most the fans there are very knowledgeable. Mojo Ram is a member there because he's local & well respected for his Rams opinions on everything football.
Thanks CardnCub but i woudn't go that far.
I caught some shit for giving my opinions on AZ's direction a few times. I try to stick to Rams-related-only threads over there anymore :LOL:
 

Alan

Legend
Joined
Oct 22, 2013
Messages
9,765
GreenMays wanting to strangle the OC:
This is why it is frustrating to have an Offensive Coordinator whose best YDS/A year ranking in 8 years was 16th in the league, and all 7 other years were 21st or worse. The main reason the Jets made playoff runs in 2009 and 2010 was their defense was in the top 4 in both rushing and passing YDS/A. We are still a ways away from having a top 4 passing defense.
You're not alone there Mr.Green.

BTW, Welcome to the ROD Mr. Green!
You probably joined during one of my many bannings so I didn't get a chance to welcome you before. Welcome to our community bro. It's good to see you sharing your views!

images

I think the truth of it is that when you get down to actually having to do the things on the ground, there is only one way to do it, and that's in cooperation with the communities.
Jay Weatherill
 

jrry32

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
29,790
I'm right on the edge of agreeing with that jrry. I have two issues which are keeping me from going over to the darkside with you.

The first issue is the one I alluded to in my other post. Long drives are more subject to turnovers IMO. In addition, running games frequently lead to 3rd and short situations and while I'm sure this is just my imagination, we seem to get stuffed on so many of those and wind up punting. A really good passing team has so many more options to choose from. The short pass being my favorite.

My other issue and it's probably the most important one, is that when you don't run a medium to high potency passing game, which takes a lot of practice, it's incredibly hard, if not impossible, to come back when you're behind by a lot. I don't believe you can just turn that on and off like a light switch. Running centered Offenses also require a better defense than passing Offenses because of that.

It's very close in my mind though. All in all, I prefer the 1999 Rams mix of run and pass. There were many games where our running game faltered but our passing game was always potent. It was our D (or lack of it) that doomed us. I don't think anyone should read too much into the Seahag victory in the SB because anyone can get blown out in any game on any Sunday.

My issue is this, your deep passing game is often dictated by your ability to run the football. If teams don't respect your ability to run the ball, they'll keep their safeties back and typically try to congest the middle of the field while keeping the bracket coverage over the top.

By running the ball, you force teams to bring a safety down, use run blitzes, and be more aggressive in their attacking of gaps. The latter makes them very vulnerable to play-action and other fakes.

If you setup your running game through the passing attack and you're struggling to throw the ball...good luck running the ball. If you are able to run to setup the play-action pass...you can still maneuver on offense with a struggling passing game. And you can maneuver on offense if your running game is struggling. Because even if they are shutting down your running game, they still have to respect the fact that you have it which likely means they are going to be more vulnerable to the pass.

Obviously, it's best when you have both. But if I have a franchise QB, personally, I'd rather have a strong running game for him to work off of than force that QB to try and make up for a lack of a running game by using the pass to open up the run.

The other issue of the opposing D not respecting your run game is probably no different that when they don't respect your passing game and stack the box. So that doesn't really effect my view point.

My thought process with this is unless you have a completely incompetent QB or WRs that are incapable of getting open...you can beat the stacked box with your passing game. Even if it's not elite.

Whereas even if they're playing a defensive scheme to stop your passing attack, if your OL can't move their DL and open up holes, you're not going to have much luck running the ball.
 

Alan

Legend
Joined
Oct 22, 2013
Messages
9,765
jrry32 wanting to have his cake and eat it too:
My issue is this, your deep passing game is often dictated by your ability to run the football. If teams don't respect your ability to run the ball, they'll keep their safeties back and typically try to congest the middle of the field while keeping the bracket coverage over the top.

By running the ball, you force teams to bring a safety down, use run blitzes, and be more aggressive in their attacking of gaps. The latter makes them very vulnerable to play-action and other fakes.

I agree and I mentioned that but that isn't one of the choices I advocated. Of course you need to be able to run the ball for the very reason we both mentioned. I'm not talking either or here. You need both. I thought we were talking about emphasis.


Obviously, it's best when you have both. But if I have a franchise QB, personally, I'd rather have a strong running game for him to work off of than force that QB to try and make up for a lack of a running game by using the pass to open up the run.
Again, I think that's a false dichotomy. I neither said, nor do I advocate, not having a good running game.

Obviously, it's best when you have both.
Here we agree. I want a heavier emphasis on the passing game. I'm not certain what you prefer. 50%Pass/50%Run or <50%Pass/>50%Run?