Here's why the Browns didn't trade down from the No. 4 overall pick

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

LACHAMP46

A snazzy title
Joined
Jul 21, 2013
Messages
11,735
If I was GM of the Browns, my 1st pick would have been Barkley than grab a quality QB at 4 .

If I was GM of the Browns, my 1st pick would have been Barkley than grab a quality QB at 4

Close.....
Better yet, I would have taken Barkley #1 and offered the Giants a nice haul to move up two spots to pick up Mayfield so the Jets did't get him.
Close....
If I was the Browns I would have taken Barkley at 1 then Nelson or Chubb at 4.
Thread winner!:yay:

Then traded back up in the first and grabbed Deshaun Watson, err, Lamar Jackson.....
 

Kevin

Pro Bowler
Joined
Sep 8, 2014
Messages
1,382
Doubtful. Any team trying to trade up should have been asking Cleveland. And since everybody knew Buffalo was going to try to trade up, it would be stupid for any team looking for a trade to at least ask them for an offer. Which of course means that the reason Cleveland didn't trade down is that they weren't actually looking to do so - unless some team approached them and floored them with a massive overpay.
So you're telling me you know that Buffalo contacted Cleveland about the price of the #4 pick even though they didn't need to acquire it.
 

Dxmissile

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 25, 2014
Messages
4,526
The Patriots was willing to trade up for him if he slipped past the browns so it seems like they did the right thing if they think he’s their guy whether he is remains to be seen
 

Liberator

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jan 3, 2018
Messages
1,375
Browns blew two top five picks. Unreal talent to blow things in that city.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,287
Name
Burger man
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #25
When it comes to selecting a QB, I’m not taking anyone’s leftovers.

If they liked Mayfield the most, they had to pick him.

I am so glad we weren’t in this QB market. Each has their flaws, and while I don’t expect it, feels possible they were all overdrafted (speaking of the first rounders).
 

Akrasian

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
4,929
So you're telling me you know that Buffalo contacted Cleveland about the price of the #4 pick even though they didn't need to acquire it.

I'm saying that they didn't somehow know miraculously that they were guaranteed to get their guy at #7, so since they were willing to pay more than normal market value to get up there, and it was widely rumored that Cleveland was looking for a trade partner, it would have been very stupid for them to not at least contact Cleveland and see if their offer of #11 plus 2 2nds would be enough. You are welcome to believe that Buffalo wanted Allen but not enough to check with everybody who might have a pick to trade for him. Even though it's common to check with multiple teams when you are willing to overpay to get a draft slot.
 

Corbin

THIS IS MY BOOOOOMSTICK!!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 Sportsbook Champion
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
11,380
Well if they let it known they were taken Barkley they would have plenty of options either way. To take your free picks or more for the 2nd pick and then they can trade down from there or take a top player the value at #4.

Part of this also is your team knowing or grabbing info out there who the giants are leaning towards and using salesmanship on the phone to convince the trade.

At least that’s how I imagine a decent GM like Dorsey being.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
23,201
Stupid Colts should have taken Curtis Enis over Peyton Manning