- Joined
- Oct 5, 2015
- Messages
- 1,315
On just 3 catches for 44 yards. That's pathetic. Foles couldn't hit open receivers if he was practicing against air! Can't blame it on the O-line anymore either. Btw I'm so glad we gave up on the run so early...
Gurley is the leading receiver...
- Thread starter NateDawg122
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 29,798
Quick had 1 reception because Foles couldn't put the ball in the same zip code as him on 4 or 5 other throws.
JoeBo21
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2013
- Messages
- 2,546
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2014
- Messages
- 5,544
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 29,798
FRO
Legend
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2013
- Messages
- 5,308
We miserably failed to improve the WR position in the draft. Spent high picks on Quick and Austin. While Austin is a nice gadget player, he isn't a quality WR. Quick has been invisible this year. WR was one of the biggest holes when Fisher and Snead took over. I'm not sure they didn't make the position worse. Gibson and Amendola may be better than the guys we have now.
Legatron4
Legend
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 9,427
- Name
- Wes
Quick looks healthy. Welker actually looked pretty good for his first action in a while. He was open every time he was out there. I don't think people realize how bad Foles really is. When we were first talking about trading for him I figured he would be a good backup. And he would. He's not a starter. He's not good. He will never be good. Imagine what a QB like Rodgers would do for this offense? I think he has worse receivers then we do. We just need an average QB. Josh McCown is average. Alex Smith is average. Any of them would do.
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2014
- Messages
- 4,526
Yeah after this game I really don't see how anyone can not see how bad Foles is even the announcers couldn't believe how bad ALL of his throws were, people blame the drops on the receivers but Damn foles but the ball in a spot where they have to make SPECTACULAR catches.
adaystl3
UDFA
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
- Messages
- 42
- Name
- ADSTL03
While Quick has been quiet for the 1st half of this season, he is starting to show up. Anyone else how many times he was open today and Foles flat out missed him? How many throws were over his head or behind him? With a more accurate QB, Quick would've had a productive day and possibly a TD to go with it. If we can get a QB and a real #1 WR opposite of him, I still believe he could be a great #2. It will be a shame if we let him go IMO.
Robocop
Pro Bowler
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 1,933
- Name
- J.
HometownBoy
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2013
- Messages
- 3,527
- Name
- Aaron
This, everyone wants to try not to blame Foles, but until we put the onus on him the Rams are going to continue to suck.
Dude couldn't hit the broad side of the barn today while Quick was open multiple times, but fuck Quick? I mean I don't get it, unless people are just trying to protect him because his name isn't Bradford then I don't see a way for you to say what he did out there was any way helpful.
Robocop
Pro Bowler
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 1,933
- Name
- J.
yes yes and yes. there was so much support for Foles and constant blame for why Foles was playing bad that it was hard for ppl to come out and tell it like it is. and now it's frustrating cus the bottom fell out finally and everyone jumps on board so now there's no nice way for those ppl to say "I told you so". but fuck it, we told them so