Former Bears GM Jerry Angelo Rates Every QB from the 2013 Season

[Prime Time]

http://www.thesidelineview.com/colu...ngelo-rates-every-quarterback-2013-nfl-season

6.8Sam Bradford
Top intangibles, good size and arm strength. Can make all the throws, but has yet to make them consistently for a season and not for a handful of games. Has one more year to show it. History says the longer it takes the lower his ceiling.

He rated Kellen Clemens at 5.8 .

 

[iced]

lmao this guys insane - completely disagree with wilson and kaep being that high, especially crapperdick

 

[Ramrasta]

It angers me to see everyone somehow buy into the idea that Wilson and Kaepernick are great QBs. They are delusional! Kellen Clemens could have that amount of success in those same systems. They just have teams which are built in a way in which the defense carries them and the offense just has to minimize mistakes. So Andy Dalton is rated better than Sam Bradford for some reason? That dude has a weak arm, is usually very inaccurate, and cannot ever operate in clutch situations. I would take Bradford over Andy Dalton, Cam Newton, Russell Wilson, Colin Dick, Carson Palmer, and RG3.

 

[ChrisW]

Bradford might not be the best QB in the league, but my favorite attribute that he has that is often brought up is how he does not ever give a game away. He rarely has a timely turnover, and if you put him in position in the 4th to win it, there's a good chance that he will.

 

[DR RAM]

Sam Bradford aside...I disagree with a lot of his numbers, seems like he's pulling stuff out of the air, or looking at stats alone. Which stats he's looking at, and how they are weighted, I have no clue.

 

[Username]

Like Doc said, there is some questionable reasoning behind some of these quarterbacks. I don't really care that he has Sam rated as average. He still has a lot to prove. As long as he can stay healthy next year, I think he can.

Sam Bradford aside...I disagree with a lot of his numbers, seems like he's pulling stuff out of the air, or looking at stats alone. Which stats he's looking at, and how they are weighted, I have no clue.

The point rating system makes you think he does use some sort of stats, but I think he's just going off of what he thinks. Why not just make a list though? Anyone who has Cam Newton rated above Drew Breeze is a fuck tard. Dick punchable territory if you have Cajun in your blood.

 

[DR RAM]

Like Doc said, there is some questionable reasoning behind some of these quarterbacks. I don't really care that he has Sam rated as average. He still has a lot to prove. As long as he can stay healthy next year, I think he can.



The point rating system makes you think he does use some sort of stats, but I think he's just going off of what he thinks. Why not just make a list though? Anyone who has Cam Newton rated above Drew Breeze is a fuck tard. Dick punchable territory if you have Cajun in your blood.

Just on principal, he deserves a dick punch.

 

[Thordaddy]

He extols the virtues of Kaep and Wilson for running pans RG for the same thing.
IMO RG is the best of the three and with those teams defense would have shown it.
So yeah I'm not real worried about his ratings,I do agree Sam needs to have a year that justifies his position

 

[Stranger]

http://www.thesidelineview.com/colu...ngelo-rates-every-quarterback-2013-nfl-season

History says the longer it takes the lower his ceiling.

How does this jive with Aaron Rodgers? This GM is all F'd up with his analysis.

 

[Elmgrovegnome]

Angelo has a very bad track record of evaluating QBs. The best very best one that he ever drafted was Trent Dilfer. It is no coincidence that he is out of football.

 

[jrry32]

I don't disagree with what he said about Bradford. Do disagree with his rankings.