Everything You Need To Know About The NFC West...and their Kickers

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

RamBill

Legend
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
8,874
2015 NFL Preview: Everything You Need To Know About The Seahawks, Cardinals, Rams And 49ers

And their kickers.

By Benjamin Morris

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features...-about-the-seahawks-cardinals-rams-and-49ers/

In preparation for the 2015 NFL season, FiveThirtyEight is running a series of eight division previews, each highlighting the numbers that may influence a team’s performance (including projections and rankings based on ESPN’s preseason Football Power Index). This is our NFC West preview.

Football isn’t baseball, where it’s easy to size up a player’s value objectively. Outside of quarterbacks and fantasy points, NFL player evaluation — even the statistical variety — is more art than science. We’re not really even sure how important individual positions are overall, much less how valuable individual players are within them.

But the kicking game is the baseball of the NFL — it’s one (possibly the only) thing that can be measured independently, and it’s rich with history. Earlier this year I wrote “Kickers Are Forever,” a passion project about the incredible and almost eerily consistent improvement NFL place-kickers have shown over the past 80-plus years, and the huge (though largely unnoticed) impact this has had on the game.1

The NFL is a game of lopsided scores and relatively small margins. Top kickers are likely worth more than people think, and top players who aren’t QBs or kickers are likely worth less than people think. The top five kickers over the past five years have added about 0.4 points per game to their teams vs. expectations.2 That may not sound like much, but it’s more than a typical non-QB contributor on a championship-contending team: The top five teams over that period have outscored their opponents by only an average of 6.4 points per game, with QB production alone accounting for much of that. In other words, the difference between an average team and a contender is one quarterback plus a bunch of players worth fractions of a point (on average) each.

Thus, to my editor’s delight, I am devoting this NFC West preview to its diverse and interesting assortment of kickers. Who wants to read about Russell Wilson anyway? There will be time for quarterbacks later.

Here are the career paths of all kickers who played in 2014 (minimum 10 attempts per season shown), with the NFC West’s kickers highlighted3:

morris-feature-nfcwest2015-1

The dotted line is the relentlessly rising league expectation. The four kickers in this division are some of the best in the history of the game at putting a ball through the uprights, yet they’re fairly mainstream (though definitely above average over the last few years combined) by 2014 standards.

And each has his own story.

Seattle Seahawks

2014 Record: 12-4 | 2015 Projected Wins: 10.4 | Playoff Odds: 81.2%
Offensive Rank: 6th | Defensive Rank: 1st | Special Teams Rank: 3rd
How clutch is Steven Hauschka?
Height: 6-1; Weight: 185 lbs.; Draft: Undrafted; Background: Soccer.


Now that back-to-back Super Bowl participant Seattle has to field a team without getting more than $20 million in savings from its underpaid quarterback, it will need every last drop of value it can get. Enter Steven “Hausch-Money” Hauschka. Over the past four years, Hauschka has been worth about +0.15 points per game from his field goal place-kicking alone.4 Although 2014 was a slightly “off” year for him (he missed six field goals, though all from more than 40 yards), he has been trending upward.

When I met Hauschka at the Super Bowl Media Circus last year, I got a chance to ask him whether kickers can truly be “clutch” and he said, “I think if you’re a 90 percent kicker, the best you can do under the most important situation is be a 90 percent kicker.” Good answer!

The hunt for “clutch” in sports continues apace, and I won’t settle the issue today. One reason this debate never ends is that there’s almost never enough data. The same holds for kickers, who may see only a handful of opportunities to win or lose a game on their own, ever. So rather than model this, I thought it might be fun just to visualize all of Hauschka’s kicking. In his four seasons with Seattle, this is what he has done — broken down by quarter, distance and the score margin at the time of the kick:

morris-feature-nfcwest2015-2

He has missed only one kick in the fourth quarter, and it was from more than 60 yards. He was 10-0 in the fourth quarter when 3 or fewer points separated the two teams. He has more misses in the third quarter, but most of them came with his team already up multiple scores. In close situations (within 3 points) he was 14-1. He has missed only three of 39 attempts at any point in the game with his team trailing at all. He has missed five of 45 attempts when his team was tied (and only one of the misses was shorter than 50 yards).

Whether or not “clutch” is real, so far Hauschka looks like what we’d want clutch to look like.

Arizona Cardinals

2014 Record: 11-5 | 2015 Proj. W: 8.1 | Playoff Odds: 37.0%
Off. Rank: 20th | Def. Rank: 3rd | S.T. Rank: 26th
Chandler Catanzaro, awesome is the new normal
Height: 6-3; Weight: 200; Drafted: Undrafted; Twitter account: @TheCatMan39.

Of the four NFC West kickers, rookie Chandler Catanzaro had the best campaign last season on a kick-by-kick basis. He made it through the first half of the season without missing at all, earning him my mid-season Rookie of the Year designation, and then immediately missed four kicks in his next four games (including ones of 34 and 36 yards).

Despite this stumble, as far as putting the ball through the uprights, he ranks as the fifth-best rookie kicker of all time.5 Yet, in a testament to the march of history, he ended up almost exactly where a local regression says that a typical rookie kicker in 2014 should be:

morris-feature-nfcwest2015-3

That line wasn’t coerced to point directly at Catanzaro, that’s just what 12 of 14 from 30-39 yards and 12 of 14 from 40-plus gets you in today’s NFL. As you can see, Catanzaro didn’t even grade out as the best rookie last year: That award would go to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers’ Patrick Murray, who had a lower field goal percentage than Catanzaro (84 percent vs. 88 percent), but who gets a lot of credit for making five of his six attempts from 50-plus yards (Catanzaro made two of three).

In fact, 2014 included three of the top six rookie kicker seasons ever — though it was perhaps not quite as dramatic as 2012, which had three of the top five seasons ever at the time, including the best two yet, by Justin Tucker and Blair Walsh (both at the top point in that chart).

While most of the headlines in Arizona will probably continue to follow quarterback Carson Palmer’s return from injury or wonder whether Chris Johnson can regain his former glory at running back — or both — the Cardinals’ fortunes may turn on this one young player’s development.

St. Louis Rams

2014 Record: 6-10 | 2015 Proj. W: 7.5 | Playoff Odds: 22.8%
Off. Rank: 25th | Def. Rank: 6th | S.T. Rank: 11th
Will Greg Zuerlein shank football into a new era?
Height: 6-0; Weight: 187; Drafted: sixth round (171st overall); Nickname: “Legatron.”


Although I can hardly wait for the empirical results of the Rams’ great and/or insane QB swap — in which St. Louis traded underachieving former No. 1 pick Sam Bradford for overachieving gunslinger Nick Foles — there’s only one issue that could possibly trump that for my attention: The extra point.

As I’ve written before, the last time that NFL kickers had as much impact on the game as they do now, the NFL had to change the rules to knock them down a peg. During this offseason, the NFL responded forcefully6 — by moving the extra point back 13 yards. Oh, did I say “forcefully”? I meant “bizarrely.”

This change will likely be ineffectual, but it will have some effect. And it has the potential to dramatically affect teams like the Rams.

Greg Zuerlein is not a bad kicker. Although he had the worst season relative to expectation in the division in 2014 (as you can see in the first chart of this post), his three-year performance is right around league average for the period.7 Plus, he’s still young and may improve. He has a strong leg, hitting 13 field goals of 50-plus yards in three years, including 58- and 60-yarders on the same day against Seattle as a rookie.

But new rules change how players are valued. With the extra point now a 33-yard attempt, inconsistency on shorter kicks will be punished more than ever.

So what goes into a shank, exactly? Most kickers these days have leg and technique enough to make shorter kicks, so for this question I thought I’d look at blunder rate from a slightly different angle: When kickers miss, where do they tend to miss from? I’ve plotted each of the 2014 kickers who have at least 30 games of experience8 and arranged them by their overall miss rate for all kicks from less than 40 yards (including extra points). Bubble size represents the number of misses per game of a given distance for each player:

morris-feature-nfcwest2015-5.png


Zuerlein is tied for the fourth-highest career shank rate among active kickers, the second-highest rate among kickers with fewer than 10 years of experience. And notice how Zuerlein’s misses are spread out fairly evenly across distances. Unlike, say, Justin Tucker, who pretty much only misses the occasional long kick to keep things interesting.

While a slightly higher chance than usual of missing an extra point may not seem terribly important on the margins, it is given the new rules. Being slightly worse at these kicks may change the math decidedly in favor of going for 2 points in a broad range of situations. That is, given Zuerlein’s history, Rams coaches should probably be thinking 2 points first.

There will surely be some extra points missed this year. I will personally be rooting for this to happen early and often — if it generates enough press, perhaps it will set off a cascade that will make “going for it” the new normal. To that end, Zuerlein may be our greatest hope.

San Francisco 49ers

2014 Record: 8-8 | 2015 Proj. W: 6.6 | Playoff Odds: 12.4%
Off. Rank: 22nd | Def. Rank: 21st | S.T. Rank: 10th
Phil Dawson’s cross-bay rivalry
Height: 5-11; Weight: 195; Drafted: Undrafted; Also played: Offensive tackle in high school.

After quarterback Colin Kaepernick got paid despite still suffering from the departure of Randy Moss, the 49ers have seen drastic changes like Reggie Bush arriving in town and Michael Crabtree moving across the bay. Their place-kicking game appears to be a rare spot of calm with 40-year-old, 16-year NFL veteran Phil Dawson at the boot.

This is a pretty interesting crossroads for Dawson. His last two seasons have dropped a bit from his peak, but are still among the best two-year stretches of his career. Though not much of a media sensation, Dawson has had a remarkable career of steady improvement. Despite his lack of flashiness (he spent 14 seasons in Cleveland, for God’s sake), his career path has been quite similar (only a bit less swingy) to that of cross-bay rival and former first-round (17th overall) draft pick Sebastian Janikowski:

morris-feature-nfcwest2015-4

One question that the uncanny improvement of kickers raises is whether it is more a result of old kickers getting better or new kickers being better to begin with. I can pretty definitively answer this: It’s both. For every Catanzaro out there, there is a Dawson.

Dawson has gotten better and better while hewing close to the improving league average for 16 years. Dawson’s total points above expectation (not year-weighted) are the fifth-highest since 1993 (and likely ever). In other words, taking both skill and length of career into account, Dawson is quite likely the fifth-best kicker of all time, independent of the era he’s playing in.

So what happens this year? Will Dawson’s age finally catch up to him, or will his knack for improving his game lead him to new career heights? Who said kicking has no intrigue?
 

Fatbot

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
1,467
I mostly like the 538 site, and this has some amusement to it -- I just don't like if it provides yet another reason for a Rams fan to panic (or are we all panicked-out already before the season even starts?)...

Maybe his meeting with Hauschka involved some heavy petting as he's clearly in love. More likely the writer is just a Seahawks fan -- a quick search of his past articles are things like defending Pete Carroll's last Super Bowl play call -- and he's from the northwest (Alaska). So that probably of explains the opinion slant in the article.

What's more important (supposedly) is the numbers & stats analysis, and what's funny is Hauschka has missed more XPs than GZ in his career. When you factor in extra points, the career success rates under 40 yards comparison is actually Hauschka 97%, GZ 96%. OMG no!!!! Not a whole percent! The writer's premise that this would make the Rams go for 2 more than the Seahawks is idiotic.

Plus, even just going by the raw numbers he uses for "shanks", let's assume both attempt 30 FGs next season. Here's the real world effect of the percentages:

Hauschka = 2.5% miss rate times 30 FG = misses 0.75 FG on the season
Zuerlein = 4.6% miss rate times 30 FG = misses 1.26 FG on the season
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
difference = 0.51 FG missed on the season = 1.53 points = 1/10th of a point per game advantage

So if the Rams are 6-10 because they've spotted their opponent 1/10th of a point due to their awful kicker, and the Seahawks win the Super Bowl because they rode that extra 1/10th of a point to victory, this guy is a genius.

The degrees of difference we see with kickers are so small that the subjective hyperbole of the writer is patently ridiculous. Does Hauschka have better stats than GZ? Yes. Does that mean GZ is a shanking machine that is the Great White Hope Of Missed Extra Points that will cause a revolution in the NFL of every team going for 2? Uh, no.

I get that it's obvious you want the best kicker and all these little things add up. Maybe a lot is tongue-in-cheek, but this article goes way overboard. He's performing the fallacy we keep seeing with the statistical/sabermetric types of translating their excellent work in *describing what happened* versus the flaws in their ability to *predict what will happen*.

Yes, you can crank out the math value that Hauschka has given the Seahawks in the past and applaud it. But no matter how much the stats want to say it's going to repeat again next season -- that's why we play the games. That's why injuries can ruin plans. A kicker can be the 2nd most important guy on the team, but you only know that after it happens. Until then, a kicker is only as good as his next kick. I'll take GZ and his better accuracy from longer distance being this season's more important reason he ends up better than 0.4 points for the Rams over their expectations.
 

Robocop

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
1,933
Name
J.
I'll apologize in advance for already being in an agitated mood after a very stressful work week. but fuck this article. yea GZ had some hiccups once and a while but that bullshit game against the skins that I attended skewed his stats tremendously. washingtons field is a fucking joke. from the 10th row you could see what a pathetic embarrassment that field was with chunks of grass torn up everywhere and you could tell there was zero upkeep and yes maybe it got to his head a bit like he admitted. but Greg was back out there alone on the field 5 minutes into halftime practicing his kicks from all angles and distances. he has my total vote of confidence and you won't find me giving him any grief for missing a kick cus I know he's working hard everyday to perfect his craft and I think Fisher knows that well. and before his career is over he will break that distance record.