Do Tavon Austin or Stedman Bailey Belong On This List?

[rams1991]

Fantasy Football: Five Deep WR Sleepers For 2015 http://wp.me/p4pK1g-1GO

 

[LACHAMP46]

Hell no...

 

[ram007]

HELL NO (ALL CAPS)

 

[DaveFan'51]

 

[iced]

only Brian Quick has any fantasy value at receiver

 

[shaunpinney]

Should we wait until we see who's our OC? and how these guys are to be utilised??

 

[Faceplant]

Man are we tough on our youngsters. Let me ask you all this, would you have put BQ on this list at this time LAST year? Year three bitches!!! GO Steddy and Tavon!!!

 

[iced]

Man are we tough on our youngsters. Let me ask you all this, would you have put BQ on this list at this time LAST year? Year three bitches!!! GO Steddy and Tavon!!!

yep, i did. And he started off decently with 8 or 9 catches for almost 100 yards

 

[LACHAMP46]

Man are we tough on our youngsters. Let me ask you all this, would you have put BQ on this list at this time LAST year? Year three bitches!!! GO Steddy and Tavon!!!

Of course....Now, they are in the same position as Quick...Lets see what they can do...Year 3 is critical....So is year 4 for Quick & Givens...

 

[Merlin]

Absolutely they do. We all know WRs are a position that depends on everything else, right? Stick Tavon or Bailey on the Eagles or any other competent offense and they'd probably be pro bowlers.

 

[Amitar]

Bailey should be if utilized properly.

 

[rams1991]

Quick is intriguing. Guess it all comes down to how they're used and the new OC, QB, etc. Foles, Glennon, Bradford? I feel like they're all similar.

 

[Athos]

Only Quick.

But even he has caveats.

Namely....having a legitimate QB and his health.

 

[dieterbrock]

The problem with Austin is that his points for Punt return dont count

 

[iced]

The problem with Austin is that his points for Punt return dont count

TD's do - the problem is he didn't have an offensive coordinator that knew how to use him

 

[rams1991]

I don't understand why he can't be utilized like Randall Cobb. He has to improve his route running though

 

[Robocop]

yep our receivers blow. 7 of 32 games with a 1st string QB is plenty of time to know the potential of these two. cut 'em already

 

[rams1991]

yep our receivers blow. 7 of 32 games with a 1st string QB is plenty of time to know the potential of these two. cut 'em already

Who said that? lol that's why we're so concerned about who the QB will be so we can utilize these guys

 

[Robocop]

Who said that? lol that's why we're so concerned about who the QB will be so we can utilize these guys

I took the 'deep' as deep threats before I read the list and realized what it meant lol.

 

[Irish]

Is Stedman throwing the ball to Tavon in your hypothetical?