Diplomatic Jackson tries to hide frustration

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Anonymous

Guest
Jackson tries to hide frustration at St Louis Rams and ponders his legacy

By Simon Milham
[www.dailymail.co.uk]
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/ot...ted-NFLs-St-Louis-Rams.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

15 July 2012

Time shreds a man's reputation once the talent erodes and he becomes just another ballplayer.

Steven Jackson is not there just yet. But he knows he is at an intersection in his career.

As the lone star in a sea of mediocrity that goes by the name of the St Louis Rams enters his ninth season in the NFL, the veteran running back is mindful of what his legacy will be.

While uncertainty clouds his mind, he's still sure of one thing: change is an inevitable consequence of playing for such a team.

The 2011 season was a debacle, underlined by a 2-14 record.

Since he was drafted from Oregon State University in 2004, the Rams have not managed a winning season.

For almost a decade, the Rams have been generally hopeless and apathetic, and Jackson does not want – or deserve – to eventually be dragged down to their level.

He is about to play for his sixth head coach since being drafted by the Rams.

Jeff Fisher arrives after 16-plus years at the helm in Tennessee, where he preached the value of running the ball, turning Eddie George and Chris Johnson into stars.

Other new faces include offensive coordinator Brian Schottenheimer, another run-first advocate, while his position coach is Ben Sirmens, a neophyte in his first season in the NFL after coaching at Rutgers.

Throw in 10 rookies from the Draft and you have a team seemingly stuck in a perennial rebuilding mode.

Jackson had his diplomatic helmet on in London this week, representing the Rams in a promotional drive ahead of their Week 8 (October 28) clash New England Patriots at Wembley Stadium.

He was trying to say the right things, at least.

'So far so good,' said Jackson. 'They [Fisher and Schottenheimer] are both huge advocates of running the football.

They have had successful runners in the past. So I'm looking forward the opportunity to play for those two.

'We just got to build our nucleus we have. We have a very young team. We've had to hit the reset button once again. The grey hairs are growing in!'

But even the British press, whose eyes have long since glazed over by the drawn-out build-up to the London Olympic Games, could see Jackson is far from content.

He's not prepared to be an old handyman pro picking up a pay-cheque and filling in wherever it is most convenient.

The Rams, too, have a decision to make. The NFL system is such that, at some point, players become cost-prohibitive, and the potential production won't match the pay.

If you don't look at age, and instead concentrate upon the level of play, Jackson's seven successive 1,000-plus yards seasons – on a team that has gone a combined 29-73 in that span – warrants every cent of the $7 million he's due to earn over the next two seasons.

But the years on players do matter. The wear and tear always wins.

Three to four years is an average career for most NFL running backs. So for Jackson, the ticking clock is almost deafening.

'That's the goal – to be part of a winning organisation. Hopefully it can be with the Rams. It would be a shame for me to uproot my family after nine or ten years and go and look somewhere else for something at I'm hoping to achieve in St Louis.'

Spoken in hope, his words are laced with frustration.

For while he insists 'my contract is not really an issue', the years of mismanagement, turnover and draft lunacy in St Louis has led to a sad reality: Jackson is in danger of being cast as the modern-day Ollie Matson.

In the fifties, Matson was the lone star on a woeful Chicago Cardinals team for six years before he was traded, in an unheard of blockbuster deal at the time, to the Los Angeles Rams for nine players.

The Rams gambled that a 29-year-old running back would compensate for the decimation of their roster.

They lost.

Matson suffered over the next two seasons with a lack of talent surrounding him.

The 2012 Rams are also gambling on a back who turns 29 on July 22, when they could have taken Alabama's sure-thing running back Trent Richardson with the third pick in this season's Draft.
Health key: Keeping quarterback Sam Bradford upright and on the field is vital for Rams' progress

Health key: Keeping quarterback Sam Bradford upright and on the field is vital for Rams' progress

Jackson half winces at the mention of comparisons with Matson, who epitomised the old football cliché that a man's only as good as the guys he's playing with.

'I've achieved a lot individually,' said Jackson. 'At this point I'm thinking about what my legacy will really be. How will it read out? No-one really remembers a loser.

'It's hard. You see some players who don't have such individual talent, but they are on good teams. They get noticed and you get overlooked, so you have to deal with that.'

The Rams begin their pre-season schedule on August 12 at Indianapolis, and open the regular season with a road trip to the Detroit Lions on September 9.

With a slate that sees the Rams facing the NFC North and AFC East this season, the youngest team in the NFL with an average age of 25.38 years will have to grow up quickly.

'Losing definitely becomes a habit,' says Jackson. 'But it's not an issue in our locker room because we have so much turnover.

'The things in the past have been washed away. We have a whole new team, pretty much – apart from one or two old faces. So that's refreshing.

'We have a very young offensive line; young, athletic guys up front, and we're hoping and banking on those guys to perform and gel together to be very productive for years to come.

'We have a very young team, one with players who have the potential to grow together and be very potent.

'The biggest thing our success lies upon is how we keep guys healthy.

'We've had a rash of injuries the last few seasons and that is preventing guys from actually getting the game-time experience they need to mature.

'So if we can keep guys healthy, especially our quarterback Sam Bradford, I think we have a good chance in our division to be competitive.

'But the big question is: Am I going to be part of it? I don't have a crystal ball. I hope so, I really do – I've carried a lot of days. But I just don't have an answer to that.'

While that may not sound like a direct plea for a trade, the underlying sentiment suggests such a deal would suit both parties. Watch this space.

Keep the Pro Bowl in Hawaii

The Pro Bowl is the NFL's end-of-season all-star game, matching the top players in the American Football Conference (AFC) against those in the National Football Conference (NFC).

Currently, players are voted into the Pro Bowl by the coaches, the players themselves, and the fans.

Each group's ballots count for one third of the votes.

Being a Pro Bowler is considered to be a badge of honour, and players who are accepted into the Pro Bowl are considered to be elite.

The Pro Bowl was held in Hawaii from 1980 to 2009. In 2010, the NFL moved the game to the week before the Super Bowl – rather than the traditional week after the Super Bowl – for the first time, and it was held in Miami, site of the Super Bowl that year.

It meant that the players involved in the Super Bowl could not play. This angered the fans and players.

The Pro Bowl returned to Hawaii for the 2011 and 2012 games but remained one week before the Super Bowl, which still needs revising.

Jackson is pleased that the NFL have decided to keep the Pro Bowl in Hawaii – for the time being at least – and said: 'The Pro Bowl is a huge honour.

'It's football tradition and that's what makes the NFL special, because we have so many traditions we hold on to. And we, as players, want to be acknowledged as being the best.

'While it works if you are playing the Pro Bowl in a Super Bowl city, it's not as meaningful, not as special as going to Honolulu and taking your family and friends away for a vacation, and celebrating what you have accomplished. You can go to Miami any time!

'So without question, I'd like to see the Pro Bowl remain in the Islands. And I think I speak for the majority of players when I say keep it in Hawaii.'
 

Selassie I

H. I. M.
Moderator
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
17,679
Name
Haole
Shaka Brah

I say keep it in The Islands too.

Local Motion.
 

ramsince62

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Messages
2,582
'The biggest thing our success lies upon is how we keep guys healthy.

Yup, the biggest single issue over the past few years (IMO) has been the inordinent number of injuries that has plagued the Rams going back to Linehan. We've had some good discussions about the why's and wherefore's. I tried last season to come up with some sort of explanation as to why this team "seems" to suffer outsized numbers of injuries (AKA snake bit), but after reading "others" opinions, I gave up, realizing that all explanations are but opinions-speculation, lacking not just statistical study, but recognition of the intangibles i.e., coaching and head coach turn-over, ever changing offensive philosophies, line instability, it goes on and on.......

All I know is, this team is due for a healthy season, or at least one where we don't exceed the mean. I think it's well understood that winning teams "usually" have below average injuries or at least they are not particularly concentrated upon the skill positions. Yes. yes, there are the examples like the Giants and a few others, but statistically speaking, there are always outlier's. The point is and particularly with a young team that's lacking real depth, that healthy units especially along the lines, receivers and defensive backs are a must in order to succeed.

FWIW, it's always appeared to me that when any single unit plays well together, good things happen and strangely injuries "seem" to occur less often.....do I have the stats? Nope, just too many years of being a spectator. I've also often wondered that when a unit (say for example the OL) executes well together, the actual act of properly executing the play in and of itself reduces the likely hood of injury just because of said "execution and proper position" during the play. I don't really know of course, most of you have much more actual playing experience than me, but it sure seems that way.

I think if someone measured the most successful teams (over an extended period), they would see a number of obvious performance statistics (i.e., turn over ratio, YPP, points for and against), you know the regular performance stuff.....but along with those numbers, I have a strong feeling that if analyzed, injuries or the lack of also played a role. To me, it's almost a self fulfilling prophecy, good teams execute well and as a result suffer less injury, while lessor teams execute more poorly and as a result (tend) to have more injuries.

In the case of the 2012 Rams, we already know the depth and experience limitations and the questions about whether particular players will step up and play well. But even more so, as Jackson so correctly points out "'The biggest thing our success lies upon is how we keep guys healthy"

To that I say, Amen.
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
33,932
Name
Stu
zn said:
'The biggest thing our success lies upon is how we keep guys healthy.

He can't really be saying that they can do things differently to keep guys healthy - can he? Sorry - had to.
 

DR RAM

Rams Lifer
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
12,111
Name
Rambeau
RamFan503 said:
zn said:
'The biggest thing our success lies upon is how we keep guys healthy.

He can't really be saying that they can do things differently to keep guys healthy - can he? Sorry - had to.
:rofl:
 

ramsince62

Hall of Fame
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Messages
2,582
RamFan503 said:
zn said:
'The biggest thing our success lies upon is how we keep guys healthy.

He can't really be saying that they can do things differently to keep guys healthy - can he? Sorry - had to.

I'm assuming you know that ZN might have written it, but Jackson said it. :beating:
 

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
33,932
Name
Stu
ramsince62 said:
RamFan503 said:
zn said:
'The biggest thing our success lies upon is how we keep guys healthy.

He can't really be saying that they can do things differently to keep guys healthy - can he? Sorry - had to.

I'm assuming you know that ZN might have written it, but Jackson said it. :beating:

No - I'm assuming Simon Milham wrote it and Jackson said it. Just poking fun at ZN - I think he knows that.
 

Thordaddy

Binding you with ancient logic
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
10,462
Name
Rich
Selassie I said:
Shaka Brah

I say keep it in The Islands too.

Local Motion.

10-4
Trust nothing you read in a Brit tabloid even if YOU WROTE IT :shock:
 

Thordaddy

Binding you with ancient logic
Joined
Apr 5, 2012
Messages
10,462
Name
Rich
ramsince62 said:
'The biggest thing our success lies upon is how we keep guys healthy.

Yup, the biggest single issue over the past few years (IMO) has been the inordinent number of injuries that has plagued the Rams going back to Linehan. We've had some good discussions about the why's and wherefore's. I tried last season to come up with some sort of explanation as to why this team "seems" to suffer outsized numbers of injuries (AKA snake bit), but after reading "others" opinions, I gave up, realizing that all explanations are but opinions-speculation, lacking not just statistical study, but recognition of the intangibles i.e., coaching and head coach turn-over, ever changing offensive philosophies, line instability, it goes on and on.......

All I know is, this team is due for a healthy season, or at least one where we don't exceed the mean. I think it's well understood that winning teams "usually" have below average injuries or at least they are not particularly concentrated upon the skill positions. Yes. yes, there are the examples like the Giants and a few others, but statistically speaking, there are always outlier's. The point is and particularly with a young team that's lacking real depth, that healthy units especially along the lines, receivers and defensive backs are a must in order to succeed.

FWIW, it's always appeared to me that when any single unit plays well together, good things happen and strangely injuries "seem" to occur less often.....do I have the stats? Nope, just too many years of being a spectator. I've also often wondered that when a unit (say for example the OL) executes well together, the actual act of properly executing the play in and of itself reduces the likely hood of injury just because of said "execution and proper position" during the play. I don't really know of course, most of you have much more actual playing experience than me, but it sure seems that way.

I think if someone measured the most successful teams (over an extended period), they would see a number of obvious performance statistics (i.e., turn over ratio, YPP, points for and against), you know the regular performance stuff.....but along with those numbers, I have a strong feeling that if analyzed, injuries or the lack of also played a role. To me, it's almost a self fulfilling prophecy, good teams execute well and as a result suffer less injury, while lessor teams execute more poorly and as a result (tend) to have more injuries.

In the case of the 2012 Rams, we already know the depth and experience limitations and the questions about whether particular players will step up and play well. But even more so, as Jackson so correctly points out "'The biggest thing our success lies upon is how we keep guys healthy"

To that I say, Amen.

My favorite story about "luck and chance"
A guy wants to fly trans Atlantic ,but fears a bomb will be on board ,so he consults a stats. guy and discovers there is a 1 million to 1 chance of their being a bomb on his plane but that the number is a million TIMES a million to 1 that there will be two, so he packs a bomb in his suitcase .

I agree with anyone who says health is important to success, but you still have to coach well and be talented or being completely injury free won't do a bit of good.
But SJ is right, there is also something to "keeping" guys healthy,IOW there are things you CAN DO right and wrong and JMO but the knowledge of those things is not perfectly homogeneous, nor perfect,it evolves and a coaches knowledge of those things evolves just as ALL his skills do. :cool: