Yeah, we were never gonna see Keenum this year anyway. The objective is to go with experience and keep the QB safe the next couple of weeks. This is just one of those fantasy scenarios where the backup to the backup's backup is the savior. Kinda like Keith Null and Thad Lewis were. But Keenum does have a little bit of experience at the NFL level, and he did have a couple of really good games with the Texans last year. Woulda been nice to see what he had against the Giants at least, but again ... was never going to happen.
I suppose it's possible he might do okay (they do have Andre Johnson and Arian Foster after all, and may have a better OL too), but I have to think that if he had anything that would have been nice to see, we would have seen it on the field. The Rams saw it every week in practice.
count me in, with this group!!EXACTLY!!!! When will the Rams get smart and start listening to us?
Count me out of this group. Do you really think he had something they put him back on bench for matt schaub drafted a qb traded for Fitzpatrick and let him go. Then only in true need of a qb with knowledge of the system do they take him back NO TY
With davis the lean mean int machine as #2 you should be able to show enough as a #3 to be #2
Wrong group Rabid. The group he's talking about is the one that is so knowledgeable about all things football the Ram's brain trust just automatically does whatever we think is the right thing to do. To get into our group you have to be all knowing and omniscient. Are you? Are you really? Cause we have very high standards.
What I'm saying is. When Keenum Played for the Texans, they were crap, and he looked pretty good when he came in for Schaub. I wanted to see what he had, playing with a better team!
And davis looked good when he came in for hill. And couisins for rg3 name a few others foles and flynn.
