1. To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Best Case Scenarios for St. Louis Rams in 2012 NFL Draft

Discussion in 'RAMS - NFL TALK' started by STL-Rams, Apr 10, 2012.

  1. STL-Rams

    Starter
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2011
    Messages:
    917
    Likes Received:
    332
  2. MerlinJones

    Hall of Fame
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,020
    Likes Received:
    758
    Rob Rang and Dane Brugler of CBS sports are both projecting (in their latest mock drafts) that the Rams will select Fletcher Cox with the sixth pick.

    So how would everyone feel if the Rams did, in fact, select Cox at six? Do you feel the value is there for him that high?
     
  3. Ramhusker

    Hall of Fame
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2010
    Messages:
    6,180
    Likes Received:
    3,432
    It could happen. I think we are in for a boat load of surprises this draft. It is a major hole on this team but I'd like to think they would draft him if they had traded down a handful of spots, say with Miami or Buffalo.
     
  4. MerlinJones

    Hall of Fame
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,020
    Likes Received:
    758
    I agree. If the Rams trade down around nine or ten I think Cox is a strong pick. I'm just not sure I'd like him at six, especially if Claiborne is still on the board.
     
  5. STL-Rams

    Starter
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2011
    Messages:
    917
    Likes Received:
    332

    Great question. I like Cox a whole lot personally. I would not be upset by that move but would like it better if we could get him at 11 or so.
     
  6. Angry Ram

    aka Captain RAmerica aka the OG Rammer
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2010
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    3,059
    Gender:
    Male
    I'd be pretty pissed. We have a chance to take 1 of the top 3 players at their positions and instead take a minimal impact position? If they trade down I'd be disappointed but honestly I hope they don't trade down again and miss out on Richardson, Claiborne, or Blackmon.
     
  7. libertadrocks

    Hall of Fame
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    Messages:
    2,224
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Springfield/Edmond
    I'd be pissed too. I dont think Fletcher Cox is anywhere close to BPA at 6. I dont think he's the best DT. We need a DT but he isnt the type of DT we need. We need a block eating slob not a featherweight.
     
  8. Faceplant

    "Did I catch a "niner" in there?"
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Messages:
    3,932
    Likes Received:
    2,755
    Gender:
    Male
    Cox @ 6 and I am questioning this regime already.....
     
  9. Memento

    Your (Somewhat) Friendly Neighborhood Authoress.
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2010
    Messages:
    5,493
    Likes Received:
    3,294
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    College student. Hopefully.
    Location:
    St. Louis, Missouri.
    I would be a bit disappointed if Cox was taken with the sixth overall pick. Nothing against Cox personally; he fills a need (pass-rush from the defensive tackle position), but I'd rather trade down to get him. If they trade down, I'd be ecstatic.
     
  10. brokeu91

    The super shrink
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    Messages:
    5,546
    Likes Received:
    2,167
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Psychiatrist
    Location:
    Providence, RI
    I agree that he's not the type of DT we need. I'm not saying the Rams should take Poe, but he'd more fit what we need.
     
  11. Angry Ram

    aka Captain RAmerica aka the OG Rammer
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2010
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    3,059
    Gender:
    Male

    lol I think that block eating slob would have some technique.
     
  12. rickrawk

    Starter
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2010
    Messages:
    891
    Likes Received:
    320
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    retired
    Location:
    So Cal
    We need to stay at #6 and take Blackmon. Man we need playmakers more than anything else at this point.


    GO RAMS!!!!
     
  13. Cullen Bryant

    Rams, Kings, Lakers, Dodgers, LA's A Teams
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2011
    Messages:
    332
    Likes Received:
    244
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Mission Viejo, Ca.
    I'd be fine with it, I would be a little surprised if they passed on Claiborne, Richardson or Blackmon but I really like Fletcher Cox. I do think he's the best DT in this draft. The Rams have lacked an inside pass rush for years and Cox would go a long way to solving that issue. He's solid against the run, can play all across the d-line and they can get a bigger run stuffing type later. The reality is they need more than one DT.
     
  14. STL-Rams

    Starter
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2011
    Messages:
    917
    Likes Received:
    332
    Good point. We have a 3 tech. Langford. A one/two would be ideal imo. Poe, Champon, Thompson, Ta'amu, etc.
     
  15. STL-Rams

    Starter
    Expand Collapse

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2011
    Messages:
    917
    Likes Received:
    332
    Although we have a 3 tech already in Langford I agree that Cox is the best DT in the draft (imo). Poe and Brockers have very high ceilings as well, though.