Bernie: Rams in dire need of game breaker

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

News Bot

01001000 01101001
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
2,624
Name
News Bot
Bernie Miklasz
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/bernie-miklasz/bernie-rams-in-dire-need-of-game-breaker/article_da67330b-3cd6-5529-92ac-c97502bcbf1c.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/ ... cbf1c.html</a>


[wrapimg=left]http://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/stltoday.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/1/1d/11dd32c2-fe98-575e-9f11-ce30f273a804/5129682915974.preview-300.jpg[/wrapimg]Looking ahead to the Rams’ personnel needs for this year, I have one primary question: is there a playmaker in the house?

For all of the progress made in 2012, the Rams are unlikely to make the playoffs in 2013 unless they can reach the end zone more often, and do it at a faster pace.

The Rams scored 27 touchdowns on offense last season, which ranked 27th among the 32 teams, and that doesn’t tell the entire story. Too many of their touchdown drives required a full tank of gas or Global Positioning System (GPS) guidance.

Teams of dogs have won the Iditarod in less time than it takes Sam Bradford and the boys to complete their incredible journey for seven points.

The Rams’ attack crawled in 2012, with an average of 8.58 plays per scoring drive. Only four NFL offenses needed more plays, on average, to put points on the board.

When you have no choice but to put together scoring drives that last longer than a Taylor Swift romance, many things can go wrong including penalties, dropped passes, overthrows, missed blocks, stuffed running plays, sacks.

The modern NFL is a fast-paced, big-play league, so it would help if the Rams got rid of the leather helmets.

In 2012, NFL teams combined for 927 pass plays that gained 25 yards or more, the second-highest total since the advent of the 16-game schedule in 1978. And the 2011 season ranks No. 1 on that list with 950 passes of 25-plus yards.

Notice the trend?

The big plays aren’t limited to the air. In 2012, NFL teams picked up 10-plus yards on 11.3 percent of their running plays, the third-highest rate since the 1970 NFL-AFL merger.

And how did the 2012 Rams fit into this explosive offense age?

[hil]According to STATS LLC, the Rams ranked 25th in the NFL in plays that produced 20 yards or more, with 53. They were tied for 20th in big-play TDs, with eight (all passing.)

The Rams tied for 30th in quick-strike touchdowns — defined as fewer than four plays — with only two in 182 possessions.

The Rams’ 43 completions of 20-plus yards ranked 23rd. Bradford was actually one of the higher-rated passers in throwing the deep ball in 2012, rated 12th in the category in game-film charting done by Pro Football Focus. When the big-pass opportunities were there, Bradford did a nice job of making connections. But the Rams weren’t able to come up with enough of them.

The Rams’ rushing game was solid but unspectacular. Steven Jackson has many attributes, but breakaway runs aren’t among them. The 2012 Rams were only one of two teams (the other being Denver) that didn’t have a touchdown run of 10-plus yards. And as a team, the Rams had only 10 runs of 20-plus yards and only one of 50-plus yards.

I have an acquaintance in the San Francisco 49ers’ football operation. This is what this NFC West rival told me when asked to assess the Rams’ offense: “The Rams are tough and physical, but they don’t have a big-play receiver and they aren’t a threat to break long runs. And we’re hoping it stays that way.”[/hil]

It’s good to hear Rams GM Les Snead preaching about the need for playmakers. Snead is aware of the limitations. Snead knows what he must do.

Bradford threw 21 touchdown passes last season, a respectable total when viewed in the proper context. Detroit quarterback Matthew Stafford had 20 touchdown passes, and he works with a fellow named Calvin Johnson. Chicago’s Jay Cutler had 19 TD passes, and he gets to throw to Brandon Marshall.

Baltimore’s Joe Flacco has Torrey Smith, Anquan Boldin, Jacoby Jones and two polished tight ends. Flacco passed for 22 TDs. Houston’s Matt Schaub had 22 TD passes, and he has the benefit of going to Andre Johnson, an elite wideout.

An obvious solution for the Rams is to find a true No. 1 receiver to take the top off a defense or outmuscle defenders for the physical catches. (Think Anquan Boldin.)

I’d be surprised if the Rams go nuts and overpay for a free-agent wideout. Perhaps the Rams’ 2012 rookie wide receivers, Chris Givens and Brian Quick will develop into formidable targets. The Rams are banking on it.

But I agree with Snead when he says that big-play capability isn’t confined to wide receivers.

Think about how much more effective this offense would be with a more dangerous, elusive running back.

How many more plays could Bradford make if he received more secure protection from the offensive line? Only nine NFL QBs faced more pass-rush pressure than Bradford in 2012.

The Rams also are behind the times in establishing the tight end as a tried and true weapon in the passing game. The emergence of game-changing tight ends is among the most significant developments in the evolution of passing-game offenses over the last 15, 20 years.

Among NFL starting quarterbacks in 2012, only Cutler targeted the tight end fewer times (based on percentage of passes attempted) than Bradford. And among the Rams’ pass completions, only 16.5 percent went to tight ends. That was near the bottom of the NFL.

Lance Kendricks is a good blocker, and he’s improved his receiving skills during his first two NFL seasons with the Rams. I’m not down on Kendricks; I’d just like to see the Rams add a polished pass-catching TE to go with him. That might be the smartest way to attack the problem.

In terms of position, I don’t care what the Rams come up with this offseason as long as they add playmakers. It can be a wideout, a breakaway back, a slick tight end or a lockdown offensive tackle to provide more time for downfield throws.

But the Rams can’t stay grounded in 2013. It’s time to fly.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,154
Name
Burger man
Last year; Quick, Pead, and Givens were an effort to increase talent on offense. And... we saw some promise. It's not like the Rams are ignoring the problem.

With development from these guys and another piece or two high in this draft we're on our way to getting the offense clicking at a playoff level.

But; banking on the development of Quick, Pead, and Givens seems like a bit too much of a gamble. Thus, I fully expect we draft a WR/TE/RB with at least 2 of our first 4 picks.
 

Username

Has a Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Messages
5,763
CGI_Ram said:
Last year; Quick, Pead, and Givens were an effort to increase talent on offense. And... we saw some promise. It's not like the Rams are ignoring the problem.

With development from these guys and another piece or two high in this draft we're on our way to getting the offense clicking at a playoff level.

But; banking on the development of Quick, Pead, and Givens seems like a bit too much of a gamble. Thus, I fully expect we draft a WR/TE/RB with at least 2 of our first 4 picks.

I think Givens will be ready to step up and dominate the #2 role. He was looking great at the end of the season. Pead will come along. I still think Quick is a long way away though. He needs to make up some serious ground this offseason. :crossed:
 

HeiseNBerg

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
1,301
Right out of the chute, this particular piece reads like a "chicken little" lament. Not sure how timely it is, given that Free Agency is still 2 weeks away and the draft is 2 months away. Ok, yeah -- we'd all like to see the Rams put more points on the board in 2013 and beyond, but there's not much in the way of talent acquisition that can happen right now.

And since when is a clock-eating offensive drive considered a BAD thing? It keeps the opposing offense off the field, while giving our own D a nice, long rest.
Bernie M said:
Teams of dogs have won the Iditarod in less time than it takes Sam Bradford and the boys to complete their incredible journey for seven points.

And then there's THIS snippet:
Bernie M said:
Bradford threw 21 touchdown passes last season, a respectable total when viewed in the proper context. Detroit quarterback Matthew Stafford had 20 touchdown passes, and he works with a fellow named Calvin Johnson. Chicago’s Jay Cutler had 19 TD passes, and he gets to throw to Brandon Marshall.

Baltimore’s Joe Flacco has Torrey Smith, Anquan Boldin, Jacoby Jones and two polished tight ends. Flacco passed for 22 TDs. Houston’s Matt Schaub had 22 TD passes, and he has the benefit of going to Andre Johnson, an elite wideout.

So...DESPITE not having a true #1 receiver, Bradford still managed to throw just one less TD than Flacco or Schaub. If anything, it hammers home the point that Sam managed to do a pretty good job, considering what he had to work with.

Anyone else notice how Bernie completely left out the O-Line in his "analysis"? Like many of the poo-flinging monkeys at RamStalk believe, the only guys that matter are the ones who get their hands on the ball. Yeah...not buying it.
 

-X-

Medium-sized Lebowski
Joined
Jun 20, 2010
Messages
35,576
Name
The Dude
HeiseNBerg said:
Anyone else notice how Bernie completely left out the O-Line in his "analysis"? Like many of the poo-flinging monkeys at RamStalk believe, the only guys that matter are the ones who get their hands on the ball. Yeah...not buying it.
That's just what he does (obviously). He panders to the crowd at the PD and fuels both fires. That's the way to keep numbers up, keep his name quoted, and have more junk to write about. Arguments that he, himself, facilitates. It's an endless circle. Pretty brilliant, actually. The only thing missing is integrity. But, who really needs that anyway?
 

jap

Legend
Joined
Jan 12, 2013
Messages
6,544
X said:
HeiseNBerg said:
Anyone else notice how Bernie completely left out the O-Line in his "analysis"? Like many of the poo-flinging monkeys at RamStalk believe, the only guys that matter are the ones who get their hands on the ball. Yeah...not buying it.
That's just what he does (obviously). He panders to the crowd at the PD and fuels both fires. That's the way to keep numbers up, keep his name quoted, and have more junk to write about. Arguments that he, himself, facilitates. It's an endless circle. Pretty brilliant, actually. The only thing missing is integrity. But, who really needs that anyway?

It's not that brilliant. Don't give Bernie too much credit: he's much too full of himself as it is. :ww: