Assessing Amendola's worth to Rams

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

News Bot

01001000 01101001
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
2,624
Name
News Bot
Mike Sando
<a class="postlink" href="http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/91671/assessing-amendolas-worth-to-rams" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/ ... th-to-rams</a>


[wrapimg=right]http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/6592/997de0509b4542d982072eb.png[/wrapimg]Sam Bradford's life as the St. Louis Rams' quarterback improves when receiver Danny Amendola is available to him.

That is a logical assumption to make if you've seen Amendola play. The statistical evidence backs up the assumption on third down in particular. But as the Rams seek to set Amendola's value heading toward free agency, they should not blindly assume that Amendola is the key to their offense in the future.

Chris Givens was rapidly emerging as a more dynamic option and a receiver the team can build around at a bargain price. Tight end Lance Kendricks was also increasingly productive. The team cannot be certain Amendola will avoid the injury problems that have limited him to nine games over the past two seasons. They've also seen Austin Pettis improve as a red zone threat. And they have to figure 2012 second-round choice Brian Quick will contribute more this season.

Those are among the factors I wanted to throw out for discussion as the Rams and other NFL teams spent the next couple of weeks deciding whether to restrict key free agents by naming them franchise players. Amendola would receive a one-year offer for $10.357 million as a franchise wide receiver. That figure would set general expectations for the annual average on a long-term deal.

[wrapimg=right]http://i.imgur.com/HtnJJrl.png[/wrapimg]The first chart shows the Rams' general stats with and without Amendola on the field last season, according to ESPN Stats & Information. Yardage-based averages are similar. The team completed touchdown passes on 4.1 percent of drop backs when Amendola was on the field, up from 2.8 percent without him.

As the second chart shows, Amendola's value to Bradford appears to peak on third and fourth downs. The Total QBR scores -- 52.6 with Amendola to only 5.7 without him -- suggest Bradford had trouble functioning without Amendola in those situations.

The relatively small sample sizes warn against overreaction, of course. Other factors beyond Amendola were at work. But the numbers affirm what we've thought about Amendola for some time. He's a very good third-down receiver. One question is whether that value extends widely enough to warrant $10 million per season.

The final chart shows Bradford's numbers on first and second downs, with and without Amendola. The traditional passing stats -- completion percentage, yards per attempt, NFL passer rating -- are nearly identical. Bradford's QBR score in these situations was actually higher without Amendola.

[wrapimg=right]http://i.imgur.com/dAGZeHh.png[/wrapimg]Brandon Gibson, the Rams' leader in receptions, receiving yardage and receiving touchdowns over the past two seasons, is without a contract for the 2013 season. Losing Amendola would amplify an existing need at receiver.

But it's also clear a team that drafts well can come out far ahead.

Givens, Quick and Pettis are on pace to cost the Rams less than $11 million combined over the four-year lives of their contracts. Amendola would earn nearly that much in 2013 alone if the Rams named him their franchise player.

The Rams have four first-round selections over the 2013 and 2014 drafts. They'll have opportunities to continue building their receiving corps at low cost.

In the meantime, they've got decisions to make.









.
 

bwdenverram

Legend
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
5,497
Name
BW
I hate to be in KD's shoes. On one hand I think everyone knows DA's worth. But he's going to have to make a lot of moves just to free up some decent cap space to begin with. I for one love Amendola, but not at a franchise # of $10 mil. I don't even think he's worth $6M or more a year. Love the heart he plays with but he does have an inury history. Those guys that make that kind of money are 1,000 + yards a year and 8-15 TD a year guys. Could Amendola be that type of guy? Perhaps, but he would have to stay on the field for 16 games to prove it. Up until now, he hasn't done that. It's like SJ, love to have him back, but not at $7M a year. We need the money for younger players.

Good luck Kevin! :)
 

kurtfaulk

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
15,970
.

all i know is the rams offense functions better with amendola on the field. he will be cheaper than any of the other options out there that can make a difference.

can't see how something isn't worked out between the two sides. amendola will know his injury history will work against him getting a huge deal.

.
 

Username

Has a Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2011
Messages
5,763
Does the franchise count against the cap? If not, I would say go for it. I wonder if it's guaranteed too. I'd imagine so for the most part.

Amendola would receive a one-year offer for $10.357 million as a franchise wide receiver. That figure would set general expectations for the annual average on a long-term deal

Idk about that. Even if so the Rams will have a lot better idea of what they want to offer him after a full healthy season. If he gets injured again then you have your answer there too.
 

…..

Legend
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
5,089
I'm starting to wonder if the Rams arent held hostage by the Amendola phenomenon. Would it not be best for the long term health of the offense if we werent so dependent on one average sized, injury prone reciever?

Amendola to me = Wayne Chrebet. A fiesty lil hustler, energizes the team by being an underdog performing beyond expectations, but he's always one good pop from IR.

This whole thing is a helluva tough decision for the team.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
48,082
Name
Burger man
The Dog said:
I'm starting to wonder if the Rams arent held hostage by the Amendola phenomenon. Would it not be best for the long term health of the offense if we werent so dependent on one average sized, injury prone reciever?

Amendola to me = Wayne Chrebet. A fiesty lil hustler, energizes the team by being an underdog performing beyond expectations, but he's always one good pop from IR.

This whole thing is a helluva tough decision for the team.

The Wayne Chrebet comparison is a good one.

I'm rooting for Amendola to return, but cautious in the use of our precious dollars.



Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
 

Selassie I

H. I. M.
Moderator
Joined
Jun 23, 2010
Messages
17,621
Name
Haole
The market will set his value ($ wise). Soon, both Danny and the Rams will know what the mystery number actually is.

Posturing is all that's happening right now.