Accountability is the theme of the day.

[Mikey Ram]

Nothing else you can do with Tavon when he can't catch the punts.

Exactly, jrry...He's a large liability back there right now..I mentioned Cooper yesterday, didn't think about Kupp..Smart move I think, at least for now...




I

 

[kurtfaulk]

huh?????

what has Gurley got to do with Tavon muffing punts? Several times. What does Tavons TD run have to do with this topic?

Whats your point here? Are you suggesting that the Rams allow Tavon to continue to "try" to field punts because another player fumbled or didnt run for yards in the 2nd half?

wowwwwww what an argument you posed.

.

 

[fearsomefour]

That's the worry. All that money and he can't run routes or catch punts. Geeze.

I can't do those things either.....hello Les, my phone isent ringing....

 

[…..]

.

Yeah ok. That your final answer?

Very humble of you.

 

[Farr Be It]

Look at me, fellas! In my pink shoes! I can fly!!!

 

[kurtfaulk]

Yeah ok. That your final answer?

Very humble of you.

if you want to find my answer go back and read the conversation from the point i ask merlin how tavon's fumble contributed to the loss.

.

 

[Elmgrovegnome]

View: https://mobile.twitter.com/MylesASimmons/status/917543389930831873




Moe Alexander is cut and now tavon takes another demotion. Do your job or have a seat it seems.

Called it. I mentioned this on the Mo being cut thread. It was purely speculation, but exactly what I would have done.

Jason's role is dwindling. Once McVay was hired I said that there was not a good fit for Tavon in his offense. Once the receiving Corp was revamped, even Tavon saw it. McVay is using him as an RB but it really seems that his limitations will decide his fate.

 

[…..]

if you want to find my answer go back and read the conversation from the point i ask merlin how tavon's fumble contributed to the loss.

.

The fumble absolutely contributed to the loss. I see where fellow members posted a little this and that to the contrary, but its all just covering a pile of poop with some Lysol. Each negative play contributes in its own way. Tavons was no different than any other. That turnover shares no more or no less blame than another. Sum it all up and it was a team loss, but the individual parts did contribute.

I suppose you could say your point went over my head because I see no reason to bring up another player, or any other play for that matter, when discussing the validity of Tavon losing his punt return responsibilities. There is a point however, to saying that the muffed punt contibuted to the loss. Minor contribution, but still....arguing that player "a" also fumbled therefore player "b's" fumble cant be the issue seems pretty pointless to me.

I dont buy the momentum swingback argument either. We were running up and down the field on their vaunted defense, having drivin the length of the field 2 out of 3 possesions. Holding that ball and starting another effective drive could have been demoralizing to them. Instead, they get the ball back and at that point they are no longer demoralized and losing thier spirit.

And really....none of this has much to do with the overall feeling that Tavon lost the job on more than one event anyway.

Not to worry...Coach said it was "a little break". We all know thats the same as being laid off instead of fired. Perhaps he'll be called back to the production lines soon. Perhaps the next guy muffs his own self out of a job then Tavon comes back in, runs a few back and we all live hgappily ever after.

 

[kurtfaulk]

The fumble absolutely contributed to the loss. I see where fellow members posted a little this and that to the contrary, but its all just covering a pile of poop with some Lysol. Each negative play contributes in its own way. Tavons was no different than any other. That turnover shares no more or no less blame than another. Sum it all up and it was a team loss, but the individual parts did contribute.

I suppose you could say your point went over my head because I see no reason to bring up another player, or any other play for that matter, when discussing the validity of Tavon losing his punt return responsibilities. There is a point however, to saying that the muffed punt contibuted to the loss. Minor contribution, but still....arguing that player "a" also fumbled therefore player "b's" fumble cant be the issue seems pretty pointless to me.

I dont buy the momentum swingback argument either. We were running up and down the field on their vaunted defense, having drivin the length of the field 2 out of 3 possesions. Holding that ball and starting another effective drive could have been demoralizing to them. Instead, they get the ball back and at that point they are no longer demoralized and losing thier spirit.

And really....none of this has much to do with the overall feeling that Tavon lost the job on more than one event anyway.

Not to worry...Coach said it was "a little break". We all know thats the same as being laid off instead of fired. Perhaps he'll be called back to the production lines soon. Perhaps the next guy muffs his own self out of a job then Tavon comes back in, runs a few back and we all live hgappily ever after.

well, i don't appreciate someone calling tavon a knucklehead for muffing a punt return. so i gave him a real example of a knucklehead play, that being gurley botching a td run by being cute and turning the ball over. and how that contributed more to the loss.

my posts have nothing to do with tavon losing punt return duties.

.

 

[Ram_Rally]

Called it. I mentioned this on the Mo being cut thread. It was purely speculation, but exactly what I would have done.

Jason's role is dwindling. Once McVay was hired I said that there was not a good fit for Tavon in his offense. Once the receiving Corp was revamped, even Tavon saw it. McVay is using him as an RB but it really seems that his limitations will decide his fate.

I used to like him as a returner. I'm not sure what happened